Did using a separate cash register keep takeout smoothie sales outside a restaurant's 80/80-rule calculation?

Short answer No. Common ownership, equipment, employees, and location made one operation for the 80/80 rule, but a documented separate-accounting election could preserve the takeout exemption.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 550.0195
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1998-04-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A dual-concept restaurant company asking about takeout fruit smoothies

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1998 staff opinion assumes the smoothies were nonalcoholic, noncarbonated fruit-juice products sold to go. Its separate-accounting conclusion depends on then-current section 6359(f), Regulation 1603, and fully documented records. Current food-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company operated a Japanese fast-food restaurant and a fresh-fruit-smoothie concept at the same location. It used separate cash registers, but the two operations had common ownership, equipment, employees, and premises.

Counsel said the separate registers did not create separate sellers for the 80/80 rule. The smoothie sales had to be considered together with the restaurant's meal sales when determining whether the business met that rule.

The assumed nonalcoholic, noncarbonated fruit smoothies were food products that ordinarily would be exempt when sold to go. Even though the company said its combined operation met the 80/80 rule, it could elect to separately account for the takeout smoothies and preserve their exemption if the separate accounting was fully documented in its records.

Common questions

Were separate cash registers enough to isolate the smoothie operation?

No. The letter focused on the shared company, location, equipment, and employees.

Did meeting the 80/80 rule necessarily tax every takeout smoothie?

Not if the company made the cited separate-accounting election and fully documented the qualifying takeout sales.

What type of smoothie did the opinion address?

It assumed a nonalcoholic, noncarbonated fruit-juice product sold on a takeout or to-go basis.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6051 and 6359(a), (d)(6), (e), and (f) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1602 and 1603(c)(2)(B) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

550.0195

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
TELEPHONE (916) 322-2976
FAX (916) 323-3387

DEAN F. ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
________

April 22, 1998

JOHN CHIANG
Acting Member
Fourth District, Los Angeles
________
E. L. SORENSEN, JR.
Executive Director

Ms. J--- I--H--- H--- Restaurants, Inc.
XXXX --- Avenue, Suite XXX
--- ---, California XXXXX
Re:

H--- H--- Restaurants, Inc.
SY -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Ms. I---:
This is in response to your letter dated February 24, 1998 regarding the application of tax to your company’s sales of certain beverages. You state: “H--- H--- Restaurants, Inc. has a dual concept business with H--- H--and H--- Juice. H--- H--- is a Japanese fast food restaurant specializing in the sale of teriyaki, tempura, chicken salad and noodle soups. H--- Juice offers fresh fruit smoothies which are cold food sold ‘to-go’. Sales for these two operations are rung up on separate cash registers. We believe Assembly Bill 1666, ‘the sale of cold food products “to-go” provided that seller keeps a separate accounting of the sale of these food products in his or her records, notwithstanding the fact that the seller may meet the 80/80 rule . . . applies to us. We are requesting a ruling on whether the fresh fruit smoothies are exempt from sales tax.” DISCUSSION Retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempted or excluded from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code S 6051.) Revenue and Taxation Code section 6359 provides the relevant exemption for certain sales of food products. This exemption is explained in Regulations 1602 and 1603. Section 6359(a) states the general rule that sales of food products for human consumption are exempt from tax. We assume that the smoothies are nonalcoholic, noncarbonated fruit juice

Ms. J--- I---

-2-

April 22, 1998
550.0195

products. Regulation 6359(b)(3) lists fruit juices as being included in the definition of food products. However, subdivision (d)(6) of section 6359 provides that the food product exemption does not apply: “(6) When the food products sold are furnished in a form suitable for consumption on the seller’s premises, and both of the following apply: “(A) Over 80 percent of the seller’s gross receipts are from the sale of food products. “(B) Over 80 percent of the seller’s retail sales of food products are sales subject to tax pursuant to paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (7).” The description you have given of your business operations indicates that although separate cash registers are used for H--- Juice than for H--- H---, the equipment and employees operate out of the same business location, and both are owned by the same restaurant company. This means that for purposes of section 6359(d)(6), the juice “smoothie” sales are considered together with the meal sales (see Rev. and Tax. Code § 6359(d)(1)). If your company’s operations do not bring it within the 80/80 rule, the sales of the smoothies are exempt from tax when sold on a “take-out” or “to-go” basis. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6359(e).) You have indicated that the restaurant’s operations bring it within the 80/80 rule. Notwithstanding your company’s operations bringing it within the 80/80 rule, if your company elects to separately account for sales of the smoothies, the gross receipts from sales of the smoothies sold on a “take-out” or “togo” basis are exempt from tax as long as the separate accounting is fully documented in your company’s records. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6359(f), Reg. 1603(c)(2)(B).) If you have further questions, please feel free to write or call me at the address or telephone number listed above. Sincerely,

Kelly W. Ching
Tax Counsel
KWC:cl
cc:

--- --- District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace