Were consumer-instruction labels sold to restaurants, retailers, and packers exempt?

Short answer Yes, when purchasers affixed them to qualifying containers sold with the product; otherwise the label sales were taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 195.1911
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-11-16
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted label manufacturer

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This November 16, 1993 opinion responds to an October 12 letter and reviews enclosed sample labels; neither the separate request nor the samples are reproduced in the official PDF. The copies of Regulations 1589 and 1667 listed as enclosed with the response are also unpublished. Counsel found that the samples instructed consumers on product use rather than serving as price or shipping tags. Exemption depended on purchasers affixing them to qualifying nonreturnable containers, or to returnable containers newly labeled each refill, and on valid certificates. Actual wording, attachment, container use, later authority, and current law control. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A label manufacturer sold labels to restaurants, retailers, and packers. California found that the submitted labels instructed consumers on using the product rather than functioning as price or shipping tags.

The label sales were exempt when the purchaser affixed them to nonreturnable containers of property it would sell, or to returnable containers that received a new label each time they were refilled. Meat packages sold to customers were the example given.

If the purchaser used the labels in another way, the sales were taxable. The manufacturer needed complete, timely exemption certificates accepted in good faith.

Common questions

Did instructional content alone guarantee exemption?

No. The purchaser also had to use the label on a qualifying container sold with the product.

Were shipping tags covered?

No. The letter said certificates should not be accepted for labels such as shipping tags that could not qualify.

Citations and references

  • Sections 6051 and 6091 — general tax and presumption of taxability stated
  • Section 6364 and Regulation 1589(b)(2)(B) — container-label exemption applied; Regulation 1589 copy listed as enclosed but not included in the official PDF
  • Regulation 1589(c)(1) — price tags, shipping tags, and advertising matter distinguished
  • Regulation 1667 — exemption-certificate contents and timing; copy listed as enclosed but not included in the official PDF
  • Sales and Use Tax Annotation 195.1935 (April 26, 1971) — consumer product-information function cited
  • Requester's October 12, 1993 letter and enclosed sample labels — described but not reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

195.1911

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

MEMBER
First District, Kentfield

450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR
Third District, San Diego

November 16, 1993

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

REDACTED TEXT
Re:

MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

Application of Tax to Sales of Labels

Dear REDACTED TEXT:
This is in response to your letter of October 12, 1993 in which you inquire as to the application of tax to sales of labels manufactured by REDACTED TEXT. The labels are sold to restaurants, retailers and packers at retail. Applicable Law Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 imposes a sales tax on all retailers measured by their gross receipts from retail sales of tangible personal property. Revenue and Taxation Code section 6364 exempts from tax the gross receipts from (1) sales of nonreturnable containers when sold without the contents to persons who place the contents in the container and sell the contents together with the container and (2) sales of returnable containers when sold with the contents in connection with a retail sale of the contents or when sold for resale. Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1589 applies the containers exemption above to sales of certain types of labels. Specifically subsection (b)(2)(B), of Regulation 1589 states: “(2) LABELS. Tax does not apply to sales of labels or name plates if: (B) The purchaser affixes them to non-returnable containers of property to be sold, or to returnable containers of such property if a new label is affixed to the container each time it is refilled. Examples are sales of labels to be affixed to fruit boxes, cans, bottles and packing cases to growers, packers, bottlers and others who place the contents in the containers." However, sales of certain types of labels are subject to tax. Regulation 1589(c)(1) provides that tax applies to sales of such items as price tags, shipping tags, and advertising matter used in connection with the sale of property or enclosed with the property sold. Labels usually considered nontaxable include those which are attached to containers to identify the product or the producer, describe the contents or instruct the consumer on the application or use of the product. That is, the essential function of a nontaxable label is to convey

information concerning the product which is placed in the container. (Sales and Use Tax Annotation 195.1935 (4/26/71).) Applying these guidelines to the sample labels you enclosed, we conclude that these labels are not price tags or shipping tags but rather are instructing the consumer on the use of the product. Your sales of these labels are exempt from the sales tax if your purchaser affixes these labels to nonreturnable containers of property to be sold or to returnable containers of such property if a new label is affixed to the container each time it is refilled. For example, if the restaurant, retailer or packer affixes these labels to the meat packages to be sold, then your sale of these labels to the restaurant, retailer or packer are exempt from sales tax. If the purchaser of these labels does not use these labels in this specified manner, then your sales of these labels would be taxable. All gross receipts from sales of tangible personal property are presumed taxable until the contrary is established. (Rev. & Tax Code § 6091.) You should obtain an exemption certificate from a purchaser for each sale of these labels if the purchaser will use the labels for an exempt purpose. Otherwise, your sales are presumed taxable until you can establish that they are exempt sales. Exemption certificates are valid only if complete, timely and taken in good faith and should not be accepted for labels such as shipping tags which cannot be exempt. Regulation 1667, which explains what information must be contained in an exemption certificate and when it must be issued, is enclosed. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely, Sukhwinder K. Dhanda SKD:plh Enclosures – Regulations 1589 and 1667

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace