Was Sundance Natural Juice Sparkler exempt when it was carbonated and contained 70% fruit juice?

Short answer No. California corrected an earlier exemption and treated the 70%-juice carbonated sparkler as taxable, prospectively for the addressed retailer from January 1, 1990.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 245.1720
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-11-13
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A retailer that sold Sundance Natural Juice Sparkler (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This November 13, 1989 letter corrected 1987 advice based on a mistaken 100-percent-juice belief. The PDF references but does not reproduce the March 5 letter or identify the later source for the 70-percent figure; it supplies no complete formulation, ingredients, label, package, test, manufacturer record, invoices, or sales records. The current annotation adds that the product was carbonated and taxable as a carbonated beverage, facts and express classification not printed in the PDF. The retailer-specific change was prospective from January 1, 1990, but no district implementation, later sale or product change, audit, assessment, refund claim, customer treatment, appeal, or other outcome is reported. Current product identity, juice percentage, carbonation, formulation, documentation, transactions, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

In 1987, Board staff had told the retailer that Sundance Natural Juice Sparkler was an exempt food product because staff believed it contained 100% fruit juice.

The Board later learned that the product contained only 70% fruit juice. The official annotation also describes it as carbonated. Senior Tax Counsel Mary C. Armstrong corrected the earlier advice and stated that the product was not exempt.

For the addressed retailer, the change was prospective only. Its new taxable status took effect January 1, 1990. The tax treatment of the other products listed in the 1987 letter remained unchanged.

Common questions

Why did the Board reverse the earlier result?

The earlier advice assumed the product contained 100% fruit juice. The later information showed only 70% fruit juice, and the annotation classified the product as a taxable carbonated beverage.

Was the change retroactive for the addressed retailer?

No. The letter made the change prospective only, effective January 1, 1990, for that retailer.

Did the letter change the treatment of the other products reviewed in 1987?

No. It expressly said their treatment remained the same.

Citations and references

  • E. L. Sorensen, Jr.'s March 5, 1987 Board staff letter classifying five beverage or granule products sold by the addressed retailer's stores — letter referenced and corrected in part but not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Unidentified later information that Sundance Natural Juice Sparkler contained 70% rather than 100% fruit juice — fact supplied without source, date, formulation, label, package, test, or manufacturer record in the official PDF
  • Copy notice to the redacted district office making the retailer-specific status change prospective from January 1, 1990 — copy recipient shown; district implementation, audit, assessment, refund, customer treatment, and other follow-up not supplied in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 245.1720's statement that the product was carbonated and taxable as a carbonated beverage — carbonation and that express classification appear on the current annotation but not in the official PDF
  • Possible later product sale, juice-content or formulation change, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

245.1720

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-5589

November 13, 1989
Ms. [A]
[R]
XXXX --- ----- ---, -- XXXXX
S- -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Ms. [A]:
On March 5, 1987 Mr. E. L. Sorensen, Jr., of this office wrote to you regarding the correct application of tax to the following beverage products sold by your stores: Tree Top Sparkling Grape Juice Sundance Natural Juice Sparkler Koala Springs Sparkling Mineral Water Juice Meier’s Pink Sparkling Grape Juice Marin Brand Lecithin Granules Mr. Sorensen’s letter incorrectly listed Sundance Natural Juice Sparkler as an exempt food product because he believed that this product contained 100% fruit juice. We have since been informed that Sundance Natural Juice Sparkler contains only 70% fruit juice. As such, this product is not exempt from tax. The application of tax to the remainder of the items listed in Mr. Sorensen’s letter remains the same. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you or your customers. By copy of this letter, we are notifying our [City] District office that this change in tax status as it applies to
[R] is prospective only effective January 1, 1990. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please write or call this office. Very truly yours,

Mary C. Armstrong
Senior Tax Counsel
MCA:sr
cc:

[City] District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace