Were shelf-stable portion juices and thickened juices for people with dysphagia taxable, including their packaging and added Vitamin C?

Short answer No. The juices remained exempt food products despite fortification or dysphagia use, and their containers were exempt because the packaged contents were exempt.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 245.1093
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
2005-01-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A manufacturer asking about sales tax and California Redemption Value treatment for portion juices and thickened juice products (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2005
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This January 21, 2005 letter describes but does not reproduce the manufacturer's September 9 request, October 26 call record, two companies' flyers, product photographs, attachments, formulas, thickeners, ingredient specifications, complete labels and names, cups and packages, samples, processing records, nutrient analyses, medical or dietary evidence, tests, invoices, sales records, or distributed copy. It declines to decide whether CRV payments were required and refers that question to the Department of Conservation, but supplies no referral record, agency answer, payment record, or disposition. The current annotation records a 2006-1 amendment, but no amendment file or supporting record is reproduced. The PDF reports no follow-up or later product sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, CRV action, or other agency outcome. Current ingredients, carbonation, labeling, packaging, documentation, and CRV law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A manufacturer sold shelf-stable four-ounce juice cups and thickened juices designed to help health-care facilities meet the nutritional needs of residents with dysphagia.

The ordinary juice cups—100% apple, orange, grape, grapefruit, pineapple, and prune juice plus a 27% cranberry cocktail—qualified as food products under Regulation 1602. They did not need to be 100% juice if noncarbonated, and fortifying them with Vitamin C did not make them taxable supplements.

The thickened juices also remained food products. Although given to people with a medical swallowing problem, they met nutritional needs, so the food rules rather than the medicine rules applied. Their Vitamin C content and specialized consistency did not change the exemption.

The prepackaged containers were exempt under Regulation 1589 because they were sold with exempt contents. The letter did not decide whether the manufacturer had to make California Redemption Value payments; it said that program was administered elsewhere, while noting that a CRV payment is included in gross receipts.

Common questions

Did Vitamin C fortification make the juices taxable supplements?

No. Adding nutritional elements to a traditional food product did not remove the food exemption.

Were dysphagia products analyzed as medicine?

No. They addressed patients' nutritional needs and were analyzed as food products.

Were the cups and bulk containers taxable?

No. Containers sold with exempt contents were also exempt.

Did the Board decide the CRV payment obligation?

No. It referred that separate program question to the Department of Conservation.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6012(a)(2), 6051, 6359, and 6364(b) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1589(b)(1)(D) and 1602, including subdivisions (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(5) (as cited)
  • California Public Resources Code section 14560.5(c)(2) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Annotation 245.0285 (3/5/87) — as cited for noncarbonated beverages composed partly of fruit juice
  • Redacted manufacturer's September 9, 2004 letter to Assistant Chief Counsel Janice L. Thurston and October 26, 2004 telephone conversation clarifying the CRV question — described; letter and call record not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Product flyers from the requester and another company — claims and photographs described; flyers, manufacturer identities, complete product names, photographs, and attachments not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Shelf-stable four-ounce cups of apple, orange, grape, grapefruit, pineapple, and prune juice and 27-percent cranberry cocktail, including flash pasteurization, cooling, use-by coding, peel-off lids, six-month storage, and 100-percent Daily Value Vitamin C — facts described; formulas, ingredient specifications, labels, cups, samples, processing records, nutrient analyses, invoices, and sales records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Thickened dysphagia juices and beverages in 46-ounce bulk packages and four-ounce sealed cups, including safe-swallow, refrigeration, 100-percent fruit-juice, and Vitamin C claims — facts described; formulas, thickeners, ingredient specifications, labels, packages, samples, medical or dietary evidence, tests, invoices, and sales records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Department of Conservation referral concerning California Redemption Value payments — stated; referral record, agency answer, payment record, and CRV disposition not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Annotation 245.1093's 2006-1 amendment notation — published on the official annotation page; no amendment file or supporting record reproduced in the official PDF
  • Copy to the Ventura District Administrator and possible later product sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, CRV action, or other agency action — copy notation present; no copy, follow-up, or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

245.1093

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

BETTY T. YEE
Acting Member
First District, San Francisco

450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082
TELEPHONE (916) 324-3828
FAX (916) 323-3387

BILL LEONARD
Second District, Sacramento/Ontario

www.boe.ca.gov

CLAUDE PARRISH
Third District, Long Beach
JOHN CHIANG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

January 21, 2005

STEVE WESTLY
State Controller, Sacramento

RAMON J. HIRSIG
Executive Director

[X]
ABC

--- ---, ----Re:

[No Permit Number]
Juices and Thickened Juice Cups

Dear [X]
I am responding to your letter to Janice L. Thurston, Assistant Chief Counsel of the State Board of Equalization’s Legal Department, dated September 9, 2004. You indicate that your company manufactures and sells in 4 fluid-ounce shelf-stable plastic cups a variety of juices and thickened juices for people with swallowing defects. You asked if sales of these products are subject to tax. You included with your letter flyers showing various products your company sells. The flyers come from two companies, yours and one other. In your letter, when you asked about the “CRV tax,” I had assumed you were asking about whether or not sales of these products were subject to sales tax. In our telephone conversation on October 26, 2004, you confirmed you were also asking if ABC was required to make the California Redemption Value (CRV)1 payment when buying these products. As we discussed over the phone, the State Board of Equalization does not administer the CRV program, and so we cannot answer that question. I did, though, refer you to the Department of Conservation for an answer.

1

Pub. Resources Code, § 14560.5(c)(2).

[X]

-2-

January 21, 2005
245.1093

OPINION
A.

Sales and Use Tax Generally.

In California, except where specifically exempted by statute, Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 imposes a sales tax, computed as a percentage of gross receipts, upon all retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail in this state. (Unless otherwise stated, all statutory references are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.)2 B.

Food Products Exemption.

Section 6359, as interpreted and implemented by Regulation 1602, provides an exemption from sales and use taxes for sales of food products for human consumption under certain circumstances. Subdivisions (1) & (2) of Regulation 1602(a) contain lists of products which, either singly or in combination, are considered “food products.” (Sales and Use Tax Regulations are Board promulgations which have the force and effect of law.) Subdivision (a)(2) lists fruit juices, “including all beverages composed in part of fruit or vegetable juice and concentrates,” as food products. Items specifically compounded for the purpose of providing a high nutritional source are excluded from the definition of “food products.” On the other hand, the mixing of nutritional elements in items traditionally accepted as food products does not cause their sales to be subject to tax. (Reg. 1602(a)(5).) C.

Tax Consequences.

  1. Shelf Stable Portion Juices and Juice Cups. The products are called “juices” or “juice
    cups,” depending on who makes them, but they appear to be identical products. The products are listed as 100% apple, orange, grape, grapefruit, pineapple, and prune juice, and cranberry cocktail. The flyers state that the products “feature a proprietary processing method that flash pasteurizes and cools to ensure the freshest flavor and brilliant color. Each cup includes ‘Use By’ date coding with easy open peel off lids.” The flyers show that the products are shipped in individually sealed cups that may be stored on the shelf at moderate temperatures for up to six months. The juices are described as “100% juice” and the cranberry cocktail is described as “27% juice.” All are described as “fortified with 100% Daily Value of Vitamin C.” To be considered a “fruit juice” under Regulation 1602, a product does not have to contain 100% fruit juice as long as the juice is not carbonated. (Reg. 1602(a)(2); Annot. 245.0285 (3/5/87). Sales and Use Tax Annotations are excerpts from previous opinions of the Legal Department.) As noted above, under Regulation 1602 (a)(5), sales of the juices are not made subject to tax just because the juices are fortified with Vitamin C. As a result, the juices and cranberry cocktail qualify under the regulation as food products the sales of which are not subject to tax.

2

As we discussed over the phone, the CRV payment is included in gross receipts. (§ 6012(a)(2).)

[X]

-3-

January 21, 2005
245.1093

  1. Thickened Juices & Beverages. Again, these products come from two different
    manufacturers, your company and one other, and are called something slightly different, but the flyers attached to your letter describe them the same way: “[S]pecially formulated to assist health care operators with the dietary management of residents with dysphagia. The smooth consistency ensures a safe swallow.” These products also come in pre-packaged containers that do not require refrigeration until opened for serving. They come in 46-ounce bulk packages and 4-ounce individual sealed cups. The pictures of the products indicate that they contain 100% fruit juice, and the flyers state that the juices provide 100% of the minimum daily RDA of Vitamin C. Though the products are given to persons with a medical problem, they are given to deal with the patients’ nutritional needs. Foods and medicines are mutually exclusive categories with different requirements for exemption from tax. (Reg. 1602(a)(4).) For that reason, we apply the rules regarding the taxation of sales of food products rather than the sales of medicines to the sales of these products. Thus, under the criteria set forth in Regulation 1602(a)(2) and (a)(5), the thickened juices and beverages qualify as food products the sales of which are not subject to tax.
  2. Containers. Regulation 1589(b)(1)(D), interpreting and implementing section 6364(b),
    provides that tax does not apply to the sales of containers “sold or leased with the contents, if the sales price of the contents is not required to be included in the measure of the sales tax or the use tax.” As noted above, the flyers show that the products come pre-packaged and are sold in their containers. Thus, we conclude that tax also does not apply to the portion of the gross receipts represented by the cost of the containers. As a result, the gross receipts from the retail sales of these products are not subject to tax. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

John L. Waid
Senior Tax Counsel

JLW:ef
cc:

Ventura District Administrator (AR)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2005. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace