Could a medicated poultry product be partly taxable based on its nonfeed ingredients?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The product's selling price could not be split between taxable nonfeed ingredients and exempt feed ingredients. California required the entire product to be classified as either feed or vermicide based on the purpose for which it was sold.
The label directed one-day poultry treatment, the Agriculture Department required registration as an economic poison, and the product primarily controlled cecal and round worms. Feed ingredients merely provided a convenient way to administer the vermicide, so the entire retail sale was taxable.
Citations and references
- No specific statute or regulation was cited in the published memorandum.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/110-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/110-0960.pdf
Original ruling text
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
110.0960
Sacramento
January 9, 1951
To:
Mr. W. S. Freeland
From:
R. G. Hamlin
Re:
J. B. H--- Co.
XXX --- --- -----, Calif.
Acct.
D-XXXX
You have inquired as to the application of the tax to retail sales of the above company’s product known as H---. You state that the company has taken the view that a percentage of the total selling price is subject to the tax in the proportion that the non-feed ingredients bear to the total ingredients. It is our opinion that the product must be classified in its entirety, for purpose of the sales tax, as a feed or vermicide by determining the purpose for which it is sold. An examination of the label indicates that it is to be used to treat poultry and that it is to be fed to the poultry for one day only. In discussing this product with th Department of Agriculture we have been informed that the product is required to be registered as an economic poison and that it is used primarily as a vermicide for the control of cecal and round worms. The vermicidal ingredients are combined with the feed for the purpose of obtaining a convenient and effective means of administering the vermicide to the poultry. In view of the above, it appears that the product is sold primarily as a vermicide and incidentally only as a feed. It is our opinion, therefore, that the tax applies to its sale at retail.
RHB:HB
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace