Was the value of access to a specific mobilehome location included in the taxable price of the home?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1976. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Tax applied to the selling price of the mobilehome vehicle, not to a genuine separately purchased right of access to a specific location. The sales contract therefore should separately state the amount paid for those access rights.
If the contract did not state an amount, an allocation could still be allowed, but the taxpayer had to establish it. The memorandum said guide values could help but were subjective, and comparable sales of similar mobilehomes without location access could be used when stronger evidence was unavailable.
Citations and references
- California Sales and Use Tax Law's vehicle tax measure (described without a section number in the source)
- Kelley Blue Book location-value guidance (described in the source)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/580-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/580-0275.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Memorandum
580.0275
To:
______
From:
Glenn L. Rigby
Subject:
Location Value on Mobile Homes
Date:
July 6, 1976
This is a follow-up on our conversation concerning the exclusion of location value from the measure of sales or use tax on the sale of mobile homes. Under the Sales and Use Tax Law, the measure of tax on the sale of the mobile home is limited to the selling price of the "vehicle". If the purchaser is buying not only the mobile home but access to a specific location, any portion of the selling price attributable to the right of access to the location should be excluded from the measure of tax. We have informed taxpayers that, if in fact, part of the price paid represents access rights, the price for such rights should be separately stated. If the vendor and the purchaser fail to separately state the location value, we will allow a portion of the price to be allocated to such value provided that the retailer can establish the appropriate amount. While the Kelly Blue Book does provide some guidelines for this amount, we understand that these guidelines are largely subjective and at times might not be truly indicative of the true value. In the absence of convincing evidence as to the value of the access rights, we often look to the prices on which similar mobile homes have been sold without location access. To summarize, the sales contract should separately state the location value. If it does not, the burden of proof that the purchase price includes an amount for location value must be borne by the taxpayer.
GLR:lb
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1976. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace