Was a record company's retail resale of a master tape taxable, and what amount was included in the tax measure?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A record company bought an original master tape from a group of musicians and later made a retail sale of that master to a recording company.
California said the resale was subject to sales tax. Regulation 1527(b)(2), however, limited the measure to the sale price of the unprocessed recording medium—the blank tape. Labor for recording, production and processing services, production expenses, and copyrightable, artistic, intangible, or royalty amounts were outside the measure under the quoted regulation.
The same blank-medium rule applied to subsequent retail sales as to the original retail sale.
Common questions
Was the record company's resale exempt because it was not the original master sale?
No.
Was the full value of the music and rights included in the measure?
No. The measure was limited to the blank recording medium.
Could the requester rely on the general letter in an audit?
The letter said reliance required the client's name, seller's permit number, and specific transaction facts.
Citations and references
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1527(b)(2)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/527-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/527-0325.pdf
Original ruling text
527.0325
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-6450
March 15, 1989
Dear ______,
This is in reply to your recent letter regarding the application of sales tax to the sale of a master tape by a record company. You noted that the record company purchased an original master tape from a band and made a subsequent retail sale of the master tape to a recording company. We understand that you are concerned with the application of tax to the sale by the record company to the recording company. Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1527, Sound Recording, provides the application of sales tax to sales of “master tapes and master records embodying sound” at subdivision (b)(2): “Effective January 1, 1976, the measure of tax with respect to the retail sale of master tapes or master records embodying sound is limited to the sale price of the unprocessed recording media. The measure of tax does not include charges for labor in recording sound, services rendered in producing, fabricating, processing or imprinting the master tapes, any other services or production expenses or amounts paid for the copyrightable, artistic, or intangible elements of master tapes or master records, whether desired as royalties or otherwise. Tax applies to subsequent retail sales of master records and tapes in the same manner as tax applies to the original retail sale. (See Regulation 1529 for application of tax to recording sound for motion pictures.)” Under the facts you provided, we believe that sales tax applies to the sale of the master tape by the record company to the recording company. The measure of tax is the sale price of the unprocessed recording media (blank tape). We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. If your client wishes to rely on this opinion for audit purposes, you should provide us with the client’s name, seller’s permit number, and the specific facts and circumstances of the transaction. Very truly yours, Ronald L. Dick Tax Counsel
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace