Illinois: Will Revocation and Revival Requirements
The short answer
Illinois permits a paper will to be revoked by a later will, a will-formal revoking instrument, or burning, canceling, tearing, or obliterating it; another person may perform the act only in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction and consent. Electronic wills follow a separate statute that permits a later will or a testator-executed written revocation and presumes revocation when neither the electronic will nor a certified paper copy can be found after death.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Illinois. Ask about your specific facts and see which parts of current Illinois law apply, with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and scope | 755 ILCS 5/4-7 for ordinary wills; 755 ILCS 6/5-10 separately governs electronic-will revocation |
|---|---|
| Later will, codicil, or writing | Later will may revoke expressly or by inconsistency; other paper revocation instrument must use will formalities (§ 4-7(a)); e-will may also be revoked by testator's written instrument (§ 5-10(a)) |
| Physical or electronic revoking act | Paper: burn, cancel, tear, or obliterate; § 5-10 lists no deletion or other electronic destructive act |
| Act by another person | Paper act allowed in testator's presence and by testator's direction and consent; no parallel third-person act in § 5-10 |
| Partial revocation | Later-will inconsistency revokes only to its extent; § 4-7 does not expressly authorize partial revocation by a destructive act |
| Intent, proof, and presumptions | Paper section states exclusive methods but no separate proof standard; missing e-will and certified paper copy create revocation presumption (§ 5-10(b)) |
| Divorce, annulment, and other family events | Divorce or invalidity judgment revokes former-spouse gifts, powers, and fiduciary nominations; other circumstance or marital-status changes do not revoke (§ 4-7(b)) |
| Revival after a later will or revoking act | Totally revoked will revives only by reexecution or a formal revival instrument; revoked partial-revocation instrument restores the part (§ 4-7(c)) |
| Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect | Reexecute, or sign and attest a revival instrument with 2 credible witnesses; no separate statutory codicil-republication route (§§ 4-3, 4-7(c)) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Governing law and scope
Section 4-7 of the Probate Act supplies the ordinary-will rules for revocation,
family-status changes, and revival. Illinois's Electronic Wills Act uses a separate
and narrower list in 755 ILCS 6/5-10, including its own missing-record presumption.
Later will, codicil, or writing
For an ordinary will, § 4-7(a) recognizes a later will that declares revocation and a
later will that revokes only “to the extent that it is inconsistent” with the prior
will. A separate revoking instrument must be signed and attested like a will. Under
§ 4-3(a), that means a signed writing attested in the testator's presence by at least
two credible witnesses.
Electronic wills use § 5-10(a). It recognizes the same express and inconsistency-based
later-will routes and also a written instrument executed by the testator that declares
the revocation.
Physical or electronic revoking act
Section 4-7(a)(1) lists four acts for an ordinary will: burning, cancelling, tearing,
or obliterating it. By contrast, § 5-10's exhaustive electronic-will list does not
include deleting, erasing, or making the electronic record unreadable. Its routes are
a later will or a testator-executed written revocation.
Act by another person
Another person may burn, cancel, tear, or obliterate an ordinary will only in the
testator's presence and by the testator's direction and consent. Section 5-10 does not
give another person a parallel electronic destructive-act route; its separate written-
instrument option must be executed by the testator.
Partial revocation
A later inconsistent will revokes the prior will only to the extent of the
inconsistency. Section 4-7(c) also recognizes that a will may have been partially
revoked “by an instrument.” The statute does not expressly say that crossing out or
destroying only part of the paper will produces a valid partial revocation.
Intent, proof, and presumptions
The paper-will section says a will may be revoked “only” through its listed methods,
but it does not add a separate statutory evidence standard. Electronic wills have a
specific proof consequence: if evidence shows the testator signed one and neither the
electronic will nor a certified paper copy can be found after death, § 5-10(b)
presumes that the testator revoked it even when no later revoking document is found.
Divorce, annulment, and other family events
Section 4-7(b) says changes in circumstances, condition, or marital status do not
revoke a will or part, with one exception. Entry of a dissolution or invalidity
judgment revokes the former spouse's legacies, interests, powers of appointment, and
fiduciary nominations under a premarital-judgment will. The instrument then operates
as if the former spouse died before the testator.
Revival after a later will or revoking act
A totally revoked will does not revive merely because the revoking instrument or act
is later undone. Section 4-7(c) requires reexecution or a separate revival instrument
signed and attested with will formalities. Partial revocation by instrument is
different: revoking that instrument restores the revoked part as if the partial
revocation had never occurred.
Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect
The express statutory restoration routes are reexecution and a revival instrument.
The second route must satisfy § 4-3(a): a signed writing attested in the testator's
presence by two or more credible witnesses. Section 4-7 does not state a separate
republication-by-codicil rule.
What trips people up
Paper and electronic wills do not share the same revocation menu. Destroying a paper
original is one of § 4-7's listed routes, but deleting an electronic file is not one of
§ 5-10's listed routes. Yet inability to find both the electronic will and a certified
paper copy after death can itself create the statutory presumption of revocation.
The revival rule also distinguishes a fully revoked will from a provision revoked by
an instrument. The former requires formal restoration. The latter returns when the
partial-revocation instrument is revoked, so undoing a later instrument can have
different consequences depending on whether it revoked the entire will or only part.
Common questions
Does divorce remove a former spouse named as executor?
Yes. Section 4-7(b) reaches a nomination to fiduciary office as well as gifts and
powers of appointment, then treats the former spouse as having died first.
Is separation enough to trigger the former-spouse rule?
The statutory trigger is entry of a judgment of dissolution or declaration of
invalidity. Section 4-7(b) does not identify separation alone as the trigger.
What if a signed electronic will disappears but a certified paper copy remains?
The presumption in § 5-10(b) requires that neither version can be located. Finding the
certified paper copy means that specific two-version presumption is not satisfied.
Statutes and sources
- 755 ILCS 5/4-7 — revocation, family changes, and revival. Lists the
ordinary-will methods, later-will inconsistency rule, former-spouse effect, and
formal revival routes. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - 755 ILCS 5/4-3 — signing and attestation. Requires a signed writing and
attestation in the testator's presence by at least two credible witnesses.
Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - 755 ILCS 6/5-10 — electronic-will revocation. Provides the later-will and
testator-written-instrument routes and the missing-electronic-and-paper-copy
presumption. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Illinois handles this in general. Ask your specific question and see which parts of current Illinois law apply to your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.