Will Revocation and Revival Requirements in Idaho

Short answer Idaho permits whole or partial revocation by a later will or by burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, or destroying a paper will with revocatory intent; revoking one duplicate revokes a duplicate-executed will. Its Electronic Wills Act separately permits a later will or a physical act proved by a preponderance of the evidence. Revoking the later will does not automatically revive the earlier one, but intent evidence, a third will's terms, or republication can revive it.
State
Idaho
Statute checked
August 1, 2026
Sources
5 statutes

At a glance

Governing law and scopeIdaho Code §§ 15-1-201(56), 15-2-507–509, and 15-2-1107. 'Will' includes a codicil and a testamentary instrument that merely revokes or revises another will. Part 5 governs paper wills; the Uniform Electronic Wills Act supplies a separate electronic-will revocation section.
Later will, codicil, or writingA subsequent will revokes a prior paper will or part expressly or by inconsistency (§ 15-2-507(a)); a subsequent will likewise revokes an electronic will or part expressly or by inconsistency (§ 15-2-1107(1)–(2)(a)). No informal-note route is stated, but the definition of will includes a qualifying revocation-only testamentary instrument (§ 15-1-201(56)).
Physical or electronic revoking actPaper: burn, tear, cancel, obliterate, or destroy the will or part with intent and purpose to revoke; revoking one duplicate revokes a will executed in duplicate (§ 15-2-507(b)–(c)). Electronic: a 'physical act' revokes all or part if the statutory intent, actor, presence, and preponderance standard are met (§ 15-2-1107(2)(b)); the section does not separately list deletion or loss of record control.
Act by another personPaper act: another person may act in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction (§ 15-2-507(b)). Electronic-will physical act: another individual may act at the testator's direction only in the testator's physical presence (§ 15-2-1107(2)(b)). Neither section adds witnesses for the directed act.
Partial revocationExpressly allowed for both forms. Section 15-2-507 applies to a paper will 'or any part thereof,' by later will or physical act; § 15-2-1107 permits an electronic will to revoke all or part of a prior will and permits all or part of the electronic will to be revoked.
Intent, proof, and presumptionsPaper physical revocation requires intent and purpose to revoke (§ 15-2-507(b)). For an electronic will, the physical-act route must be established by a preponderance of the evidence, including the testator's intent (§ 15-2-1107(2)(b)). The surveyed sections state no later-will replacement/supplement presumption and no missing-original presumption.
Divorce, annulment, and other family eventsUnless the will expressly says otherwise, divorce or annulment revokes gifts/property appointments, general or special powers of appointment, and executor/trustee/conservator/guardian nominations for the former spouse; the will operates as if the former spouse failed to survive (§ 15-2-508). Remarriage revives provisions revoked solely by that section. A separation that preserves spouse status is not divorce, and no other changed circumstance revokes the will.
Revival after a later will or revoking actIf a second will that would have revoked the first is revoked by acts under § 15-2-507, the first remains revoked in whole or part unless the circumstances or the testator's contemporary/subsequent declarations show intent that it take effect as executed (§ 15-2-509(a)). If a third will revokes the second, the first stays revoked except to the extent the third will's terms show revival intent (§ 15-2-509(b)).
Reexecution, republication, and codicil effectRepublication of a revoked will revives it (§ 15-2-509(c)); the section does not define the required republication act. Because 'will' includes a codicil, the same later-will and revival rules apply to codicils, but the statutes state no separate revoked-codicil restoration presumption.

Idaho has two revocation tracks. The older Uniform Probate Code sections govern ordinary paper wills, while the 2023 Uniform Electronic Wills Act adds a separate rule for electronic wills. The general definition of will includes codicils and testamentary instruments whose only purpose is to revoke or revise another will.

Requirements one by one

Later will, codicil, or writing

For a paper will, § 15-2-507(a) permits a subsequent will to revoke the earlier will or any part expressly or by inconsistency. For an electronic will, § 15-2-1107(2)(a) uses the same express-or-inconsistent later-will rule.

Neither section creates an informal-note route. A formal revocation-only testamentary instrument can qualify because § 15-1-201(56) includes such an instrument within the definition of a will.

Paper revocation by physical act

Section 15-2-507(b) lists burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, and destroying. The testator must act with the intent and purpose of revoking the paper will or part. Another person may perform the act only in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction.

Idaho adds a duplicate-original rule. If the will was executed in duplicate, revoking one duplicate revokes the will under § 15-2-507(c). A person should not assume the untouched duplicate necessarily remains operative.

Electronic-will revocation

Section 15-2-1107 permits an electronic will to revoke all or part of an earlier will, whether the earlier will is paper or electronic. The electronic will or part can then be revoked by a subsequent will or by a physical act.

The physical-act route is valid only if a preponderance of the evidence establishes that the testator acted with intent to revoke all or part, or directed another person who performed the act in the testator's physical presence. The section does not list deletion, rendering unreadable, or loss of control as separate acts, so those terms should not be inserted into Idaho's rule.

Partial revocation

Both tracks expressly permit partial revocation. Section 15-2-507 begins with a will "or any part thereof." Section 15-2-1107 says an electronic will may revoke "all or part" of a previous will and that "all or part" of the electronic will may itself be revoked.

That means Idaho does not limit the physical-act route to destruction of the entire estate plan. Intent and proof still determine what the act revoked.

Intent, proof, and presumptions

For paper, the listed act must be performed "with the intent and for the purpose of revoking" the will or part. Section 15-2-507 states no quantified proof standard.

For an electronic will, § 15-2-1107 supplies one: the physical act and the required intent, actor, direction, and physical-presence facts must be established by a preponderance of the evidence.

Neither section creates a complete-disposition later-will presumption or a missing-original presumption.

Divorce, annulment, remarriage, and other changes

Unless the will expressly provides otherwise, divorce or annulment revokes four types of provision for the former spouse: a property disposition or appointment, a general or special power of appointment, and nomination as executor, trustee, conservator, or guardian.

Section 15-2-508 then treats property provisions as though the former spouse failed to survive and interprets the revoked powers and offices the same way. Remarriage to the former spouse revives provisions revoked solely by this section.

A separation decree that does not terminate spouse status is not a divorce, and the last sentence of § 15-2-508 says no other changed circumstance revokes a will. The Idaho rule does not extend revocation to relatives of the former spouse.

Revival after the second will is revoked

Idaho rejects automatic revival. Under § 15-2-509(a), if a second will that would have revoked the first is itself revoked by acts under § 15-2-507, the first remains revoked in whole or part unless the revocation circumstances or the testator's contemporary or later declarations show intent that the first take effect as executed.

If a third will revokes the second, subsection (b) keeps the first revoked except to the extent the third will's terms show that the testator intended the first to take effect. The third-will route therefore turns on the third instrument's terms.

Republication and codicil effect

Idaho adds a concise restoration rule that many states lack: "Republication of a revoked will revives such will" (§ 15-2-509(c)). The section does not define a separate informal republication procedure, so that sentence should not be read as making mere possession or an oral statement sufficient.

Because Idaho's definition of will includes a codicil, the same later-will and revival rules apply to codicils. The Act does not separately state that a codicil republishes a will or that revoking a codicil automatically restores every provision it changed.

What trips people up

  • One duplicate can revoke both. Section 15-2-507(c) makes revocation of one duplicate sufficient when the will was executed in duplicate.
  • The electronic rule requires a physical act. Idaho does not copy statutes that separately list deletion or loss of control over an electronic record.
  • Only electronic physical-act revocation has a statutory evidence level. It uses preponderance of the evidence; the paper section states none.
  • Divorce revocation is former-spouse-only. Idaho does not extend § 15-2-508 to the former spouse's relatives.
  • Republication is an express revival route. It is separate from the intent rules governing destruction of a later will or execution of a third will.

Common questions

Can an electronic will revoke a paper will?

Yes. Section 15-2-1107(1) says an electronic will may revoke all or part of a previous will and does not limit the previous will to electronic form.

May another person destroy the will?

Yes. For paper, the person must act in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction. For electronic-will physical-act revocation, the statute specifies the testator's physical presence.

Does divorce revoke the entire Idaho will?

No. It revokes the listed former-spouse gifts, powers, and fiduciary nominations unless the will expressly provides otherwise.

Does destroying the second will revive the first?

Not automatically. The circumstances or the testator's declarations must show intent for the first to take effect as executed, or another statutory revival route must apply.

Statutes and sources

  • Idaho Code § 15-1-201(56) — will definition, including codicils and revocation-only testamentary instruments. Official text (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • Idaho Code § 15-2-507 — paper whole/partial revocation, listed acts, directed acts, intent, and duplicate wills. Official text (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • Idaho Code § 15-2-508 — divorce, annulment, construction, remarriage revival, and no-other-change rule. Official text (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • Idaho Code § 15-2-509 — revival after acts or a third will and republication. Official text (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • Idaho Code § 15-2-1107 — electronic-will whole/partial revocation, preponderance standard, and physical-presence directed act. Official text (accessed 2026-08-01).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Idaho Code § 15-1-201(56) · accessed 2026-08-01
Idaho Code § 15-2-507 · accessed 2026-08-01
Idaho Code § 15-2-508 · accessed 2026-08-01
Idaho Code § 15-2-509 · accessed 2026-08-01
Idaho Code § 15-2-1107 · accessed 2026-08-01
This page is general legal information about state-law revocation and revival of wills and codicils, not legal advice about a particular estate, missing or damaged original, divorce, remarriage, electronic record, probate dispute, or estate plan. Crossing out, tearing, deleting, or discarding a document may fail to revoke it, may revoke more than intended, or may create a fact-intensive proof dispute; revoking a later will does not necessarily bring an earlier will back. Family-status rules and omitted-spouse or omitted-child rights are separate questions. Verified against the cited official sources on the date shown; obtain licensed estate-planning or probate advice before altering, destroying, replacing, or relying on a will or codicil.

What does Idaho law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Idaho law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace