Michigan: Wage Garnishment Limits
The short answer
Michigan doesn't set its own percentage cap for an ordinary judgment creditor — it applies the federal formula directly: the lesser of 25% of weekly disposable earnings, or the amount those earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage. A single periodic garnishment now stays in effect until the judgment is paid off rather than expiring every 182 days. Child support and alimony withholding orders are capped lower, at a flat 50% of disposable earnings, and always outrank an ordinary garnishment regardless of which was served first — as does a state tax levy.
| Governing law | Garnishment authorization, priority, and procedure: Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 600.4011-600.4012 (Revised Judicature Act) and Michigan Court Rule 3.101; child support and alimony withholding: the Support and Parenting Time Enforcement Act, MCL 552.601 et seq. (cap in § 552.608, priority in § 552.611) |
|---|---|
| Maximum that can be garnished | No independent Michigan percentage — MCR 3.101(B)(1)(c) applies the federal ceiling directly: the lesser of 25% of weekly disposable earnings, or the amount by which disposable earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage (15 U.S.C. § 1673) |
| State rule vs. federal floor | Adopts the federal floor as-is for an ordinary garnishment, rather than raising or lowering it (MCR 3.101(B)(1)(c) cites 15 U.S.C. § 1673 by name as the governing ceiling); Michigan's OWN independent cap for child support, 50% flat (MCL 552.608), is more protective than the federal support ceiling, which allows up to 60% (or 65% if 12+ weeks in arrears) |
| Minimum-wage protected floor | 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage — the same multiplier and wage floor as the federal formula, with no separate Michigan multiplier or state-minimum-wage substitute |
| Support, tax & student loan debts | Child support and alimony withholding is capped at a flat 50% of disposable earnings under MCL 552.608, regardless of arrears or other dependents — narrower than the federal ceiling, which would let support withholding reach 60% (or 65% with 12+ weeks of arrears); an income-withholding order for support and a state or governmental-unit tax levy both outrank an ordinary garnishment 'regardless of the order in which they are received' (MCL 600.4012(2)); federal tax levies and federal student loan administrative wage garnishment (up to 15%) reach Michigan wages independently of state law |
| Head-of-household/family exemption | None — Michigan's ordinary cap is exactly the federal 25%/30x formula with no additional state-law exemption layered on top for dependents or head-of-household status |
| Multiple garnishments at once | MCL 600.4012(2) sets it directly: a support income-withholding order and a state/governmental-unit tax levy both outrank an ordinary garnishment no matter which was received first; among garnishments of the same priority tier, the one received earliest controls, and a garnishee owes nothing on a later-received, same-or-lower-priority garnishment until the earlier one stops being effective — except that, per MCR 3.101(B)(1)(c), a garnishee must still withhold under a lower-priority earnings garnishment to the extent a higher-priority order takes less than the full federal ceiling |
| Protection from being fired | No Michigan-specific anti-discharge statute was found in the garnishment statutes (MCL 600.4011-600.4012), Michigan Court Rule 3.101, or the state's wage-payment law; Michigan relies on the federal floor alone, 15 U.S.C. § 1674, which bars discharge over garnishment of a single debt |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
The short answer
Michigan doesn't write its own percentage into its garnishment law. Instead,
its garnishment rule points straight to the federal formula: an ordinary
judgment creditor — a credit card company, a hospital, a personal-loan
lender — can take no more than the lesser of 25% of your weekly disposable
earnings, or the amount those earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum
hourly wage. Since a 2015 overhaul, a periodic wage garnishment also no
longer expires every 182 days — it now runs until the judgment is paid in
full. Child support and alimony are different: withholding for those is
capped lower, at a flat 50% of disposable earnings, and a support order or
a state tax levy always jumps ahead of an ordinary garnishment no matter
which one a garnishee received first.
Requirements one by one
Governing law
Michigan's garnishment authority sits in the Revised Judicature Act, MCL §§
600.4011 and 600.4012, which set out who can be garnished, how priority
among multiple garnishments works, and the procedural mechanics. The
day-to-day process — how a writ is served, how withholding is computed and
disclosed — is spelled out in Michigan Court Rule 3.101. Child support and
alimony withholding runs on an entirely separate statute, the Support and
Parenting Time Enforcement Act, MCL 552.601 et seq., with its own cap in §
552.608 and its own priority rule in § 552.611.
Maximum that can be garnished
Neither MCL 600.4011 nor 600.4012 states a Michigan-specific percentage.
Instead, MCR 3.101(B)(1)(c) points directly to federal law, describing "the
maximum that could be withheld by law" for an earnings garnishment as the
amount set by 15 U.S.C. § 1673: the lesser of 25% of weekly disposable
earnings, or the amount those earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum
hourly wage. In effect, Michigan simply applies the federal ceiling rather
than adopting a different number of its own.
State rule vs. federal floor
For an ordinary garnishment, Michigan matches the federal floor exactly
rather than raising or lowering it — there's no independent Michigan
formula to compare. Where Michigan does set its own number is child
support: § 552.608 caps support withholding at a flat 50% of disposable
earnings, which is more protective than the federal ceiling that would
otherwise allow up to 60%, or 65% if the obligor is 12 or more weeks
behind.
Minimum-wage protected floor
The multiplier is 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage — the same
number the federal formula itself uses, with no separate Michigan
multiplier and no substitution of a (higher) state minimum wage in the
calculation.
Support, tax & student loan debts
Child support and alimony withholding is capped at a flat 50% of
disposable earnings under § 552.608, regardless of arrears or whether the
obligor supports another family — Michigan doesn't step the percentage up
to the higher figures federal law would otherwise permit. Both a support
income-withholding order and a state or governmental-unit tax levy outrank
an ordinary garnishment "regardless of the order in which they are
received" (MCL 600.4012(2)). Federal tax levies and federal student loan
administrative wage garnishment — up to 15%, without a court judgment —
reach Michigan paychecks independently of any of this, because those
processes come from federal law.
Head-of-household/family exemption
Michigan doesn't have one. Its ordinary garnishment cap is exactly the
federal 25%/30x formula, with no additional exemption for a debtor who
supports a family or qualifies as head of household layered on top of it,
the way some other states add.
Multiple garnishments at once
MCL 600.4012(2) resolves this directly: a support income-withholding order
and a state or governmental-unit tax levy both outrank an ordinary
garnishment no matter which arrived first. Among garnishments of the same
priority level, the one the garnishee received earliest controls, and the
garnishee owes nothing on a later, same-or-lower-priority garnishment until
the earlier one stops being effective. There's one wrinkle for earnings
specifically: MCR 3.101(B)(1)(c) requires the garnishee to still withhold
under the lower-priority garnishment to the extent the higher-priority
order is taking less than the full amount the federal ceiling would allow
— so a support order that isn't using the whole 25%/30x cushion doesn't
necessarily block a second garnishment entirely.
Protection from being fired
No Michigan-specific statute barring discharge over a garnishment turned up
in the garnishment law itself, the court rule, or the state's wage-payment
act. Michigan relies on the federal rule alone: 15 U.S.C. § 1674 bars
firing an employee because their earnings were garnished for a single
debt.
What trips people up
The 2015 overhaul (Public Act 14) changed more than the math — before it,
a periodic garnishment lapsed after 182 days and had to be reissued;
now it simply runs until the judgment, interest, and costs are paid off,
which matters if you're trying to track when a garnishment against your
pay will actually end. And the priority rule cuts both ways: a support
order or tax levy doesn't just outrank a competing garnishment, it can
still leave room for a lower-priority garnishment to take a partial bite
if the higher-priority order isn't using the full amount the law would
otherwise allow.
Common questions
Can a credit card company take more than 25% of my paycheck in
Michigan?
No — Michigan applies the federal cap directly: the lesser of 25% of your
disposable earnings, or the amount those earnings exceed 30 times the
federal minimum hourly wage.
If I'm already paying child support and a credit card company also gets
a judgment against me, which garnishment wins?
The child support withholding order wins automatically — MCL 600.4012(2)
gives it priority over an ordinary garnishment no matter which one your
employer received first.
Does my old wage garnishment expire after six months?
Not anymore. Since a 2015 change to MCL 600.4012, a periodic garnishment
stays in effect until the judgment, interest, and costs are fully paid,
rather than expiring every 182 days.
Statutes and sources
- Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.4012 — "(1) A garnishment of periodic payments
remains in effect until the balance of the judgment is satisfied. (2) A
garnishee is not liable for a garnishment of periodic payments under
subsection (1) to the extent that the garnishee is required to satisfy
another garnishment against the same defendant having a higher priority
or having the same priority but received at an earlier date. ... Both of
the following have priority over a garnishment, regardless of the order
in which they are received: (a) An order of income withholding ... (b) A
levy of this state or a governmental unit of this state to satisfy a tax
liability." —
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-600-4012
(accessed 2026-07-05) - Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.4011 — "Subject to sections 4061 and 4061a, and
the conditions in subsections (2) to (10), the court has power by
garnishment to apply the following property or obligation, or both, to
the satisfaction of a claim ... (5) A garnishment proceeding shall not
be commenced against a person for money owing to a defendant on account
of labor performed by the defendant until after the plaintiff's claim
has been reduced to judgment." —
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-600-4011
(accessed 2026-07-05) - Michigan Court Rule 3.101(B)(1)(c) — "If a writ of periodic garnishment
is served on a garnishee who is obligated to make periodic payments to
the defendant while another order that has priority under MCL
600.4012(2) is in effect ... the garnishee is not obligated to withhold
payments pursuant to the lower priority writ until the higher priority
writ ceases to be effective ... However, in the case of garnishment of
earnings, the garnishee shall withhold pursuant to the lower priority
writ to the extent that the amount being withheld pursuant to the
higher priority order is less than the maximum that could be withheld
by law pursuant to the lower priority writ (see, e.g., 15 USC 1673)." —
https://www.courts.michigan.gov/siteassets/rules-instructions-administrative-orders/michigan-court-rules/court-rules-book-ch-3-responsive-html5.zip/Court_Rules_Book_Ch_3/Court_Rules_Chapter_3/Court_Rules_Chapter_3.htm
(accessed 2026-07-05) - Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.608 — "The total amount of income withheld under
this act under all orders to withhold income for current support, past
due support, fees, and health care coverage premiums effective against
a payer shall not exceed 50% of the payer's disposable earnings as that
term is defined in 15 USC 1672." —
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-552-608
(accessed 2026-07-05) - Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.611 — "An order of income withholding entered
under this act is binding upon a source of income 7 days after service
... The order of income withholding remains in effect until further
order of the court. An order of income withholding has priority over
all other legal process under state law against the same income." —
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-552-611
(accessed 2026-07-05) - 15 U.S.C. § 1673 — "Except as provided in subsection (b) and in section
1675 of this title, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable
earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to
garnishment may not exceed (1) 25 per centum of his disposable earnings
for that week, or (2) the amount by which his disposable earnings for
that week exceed thirty times the Federal minimum hourly wage
prescribed by section 206(a)(1) of title 29 in effect at the time the
earnings are payable, whichever is less." —
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2011-title15/USCODE-2011-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673
(accessed 2026-07-05) - 15 U.S.C. § 1674 — "No employer may discharge any employee by reason of
the fact that his earnings have been subjected to garnishment for any
one indebtedness." —
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title15/html/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1674.htm
(accessed 2026-07-05)
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.