Utah: Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection

verified against the statute 2026-07-09 5 statute sources

The short answer

Utah gives a creditor 6 years to sue on a written debt and 4 years on an oral or unwritten one, including an open store account or an open account for services. A debt for the sale of goods gets its own 4-year period under Utah's commercial code. The clock generally starts at breach, with no automatic discovery rule for an ordinary contract claim. A written acknowledgment or a payment by the debtor restarts the clock for any debt; for a bank-style credit agreement specifically, Utah goes further and lets even a payment made by a THIRD PARTY (not just the debtor) serve as the new starting date. Utah has a classic borrowing statute with a resident-plaintiff exception, and a statute providing that once a claim is genuinely barred it becomes unavailable either as a cause of action or as a defense: though, like most states, expiration ordinarily still has to be raised by the debtor as an affirmative defense.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in Utah. Ezel applies current Utah law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.

Governing lawUtah Code § 78B-2-309 (6yr, written contract/obligation/liability); § 78B-2-307 (4yr, unwritten contract/obligation/liability, open store account, or open account for services); § 70A-2-725 (4yr, UCC sale-of-goods debt); § 78B-2-113 (payment/acknowledgment revival, and the general statutory-bar-absolute rule); § 78B-2-103 (borrowing statute for a claim arising in another state)
Written contract/debt deadline6 years: § 78B-2-309(1)(b) covers 'any contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument in writing.' The Utah Supreme Court's own test for what counts as 'founded upon an instrument in writing' asks whether 'the fact of liability arises or is assumed or imposed from the instrument itself, or its recitals' (Bracklein v. Realty Ins. Co., 1938, applied in Brigham Young Univ. v. Paulsen Constr. Co., 744 P.2d 1370 (Utah 1987)). For a 'credit agreement' specifically (a financial institution's loan, credit extension, or financial accommodation, as defined in § 25-5-4), § 78B-2-309(2) sets a special accrual rule: the 6-year period begins on the LATEST of the day the debt arose, a written acknowledgment/promise, or a payment by the debtor OR a third party
Oral contract/open account deadline4 years, § 78B-2-307(1)(a) covers 'a contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument in writing,' running 'after the last charge is made or the last payment is received.' The same 4-year period and last-charge-or-payment trigger also covers an open store account for goods and an open account for work, labor, services, or materials (§ 78B-2-307(1)(b)-(c)), these open-account categories are grouped with the oral/unwritten bucket rather than getting a separate rule of their own
When the clock startsDate of breach is the default, and Utah courts have declined to read in a general discovery rule for an ordinary contract claim: in Brigham Young Univ. v. Paulsen Constr. Co., the Utah Supreme Court applied the 6-year written-contract period but expressly 'decline[d] to hold that the statute was tolled pending [the plaintiff's] discovery of the defective [condition].' For an unwritten/open-account claim under § 78B-2-307(1), the trigger is explicitly 'the last charge... or the last payment... received,' not the date of the original charge
Can a payment or promise restart the clock?§ 78B-2-113(1) provides generally that 'an action for recovery of a debt may be brought within the applicable statute of limitations from the date: (a) the debt arose; (b) a written acknowledgment of the debt or a promise to pay is made by the debtor; or (c) a payment is made on the debt by the debtor': whichever of these three dates is used, the clock is computed from that date forward, with no textual cap limiting this to a still-running (not-yet-expired) claim. A Utah Court of Appeals case, Daniels v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust (2021), applied this rule concretely: the last payment date, not the original default date, controlled when the 6-year period actually expired. For a 'credit agreement' specifically, § 78B-2-309(2) goes further than § 78B-2-113's general debtor-only payment rule, letting a payment by A THIRD PARTY (not just the debtor) also serve as the new starting date
Special rule for consumer debtNone found. The same § 78B-2-307/§ 78B-2-309 periods apply to consumer and commercial debt alike; Utah has no separate limitations period specifically for consumer-credit-transaction debt. The Utah Consumer Credit Code (Title 70C) sets its own one-year period for an action alleging a CREDITOR's violation of that Code's disclosure and rate rules: a different kind of claim (a statutory-violation claim against the creditor) than the deadline to sue ON the debt itself, which this survey covers
Out-of-state debtA classic 'basic borrowing statute with a resident-plaintiff exception,' the same shape as California's and New York's. § 78B-2-103: 'A cause of action which arises in another jurisdiction, and which is not actionable in the other jurisdiction by reason of the lapse of time, may not be pursued in this state, unless the cause of action is held by a citizen of this state who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued'
What expiration actually does§ 78B-2-113(2) states that once 'a right of action is barred by the provisions of any statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of action or ground for defense': a real statutory bar, applying across all of Chapter 2's limitations periods, not just a bare affirmative-defense default. No Utah statute specific to debt collectors was found that separately bars a THIRD-PARTY collector from suing on a time-barred debt; a 2023 law (H.B. 20) instead repealed several older debt-collection-agency registration and bonding statutes as redundant, leaving Title 12's collection-fee limitation as the main surviving debt-collector-specific statute outside the ordinary limitations chapter

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Requirements one by one

Governing law

Utah's contract-debt deadlines live in Title 78B, Chapter 2 of the Utah
Code. Section 78B-2-309 sets the 6-year period for a written contract,
obligation, or liability. Section 78B-2-307 sets the 4-year period for an
unwritten one, and also covers an open store account and an open account
for services. A debt for the sale of goods gets its own 4-year period under
§ 70A-2-725, part of Utah's enactment of UCC Article 2. Section 78B-2-113
addresses revival by acknowledgment or payment, and also states the general
effect of an established bar. Section 78B-2-103 sets Utah's borrowing
statute for a debt that arose in another state.

How long you have on a written debt

Six years. Section 78B-2-309(1)(b) covers "any contract, obligation, or
liability founded upon an instrument in writing." The Utah Supreme Court's
own test for whether a claim counts as "founded upon an instrument in
writing" asks whether "the fact of liability arises or is assumed or
imposed from the instrument itself, or its recitals" (Bracklein v. Realty
Ins. Co., 1938, applied in Brigham Young Univ. v. Paulsen Constr. Co., 744
P.2d 1370 (Utah 1987)). For a "credit agreement" specifically, a bank,
credit union, or other financial institution's loan, credit extension, or
financial accommodation, as defined in § 25-5-4, § 78B-2-309(2) adds a
special accrual rule: the 6-year period begins on the LATEST of the day the
debt arose, a written acknowledgment or promise to pay, or a payment made
by the debtor OR a third party.

How long you have on an oral or unwritten debt

Four years. Section 78B-2-307(1)(a) covers "a contract, obligation, or
liability not founded upon an instrument in writing." The same 4-year
period, running "after the last charge is made or the last payment is
received," also covers an open store account for goods (§ 78B-2-307(1)(b))
and an open account for work, labor, services, or materials furnished
(§ 78B-2-307(1)(c)), both grouped into this unwritten bucket rather than
getting their own separate rule.

When the clock starts

The default is the date of breach, and Utah courts have declined to import
a general discovery rule into an ordinary contract claim. In Brigham Young
Univ. v. Paulsen Constr. Co., the Utah Supreme Court applied the 6-year
written-contract period to a construction dispute but expressly "decline[d]
to hold that the statute was tolled" while the university remained unaware
of the underlying defect. For an unwritten or open-account claim under
§ 78B-2-307, the statute is explicit that the trigger is "the last charge...
or the last payment... received," not the date of the very first charge.

Can a payment or promise restart the clock?

Yes. Section 78B-2-113(1) provides generally that an action for recovery of
a debt may be brought within the applicable limitations period "from the
date: (a) the debt arose; (b) a written acknowledgment of the debt or a
promise to pay is made by the debtor; or (c) a payment is made on the debt
by the debtor", whichever of those three dates applies, the clock is
computed from that point forward. Nothing in the text caps this to a
still-running claim. A 2021 Utah Court of Appeals decision, Daniels v.
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust, illustrates the mechanic in practice: the
homeowners' last loan payment date, not the original default date, controlled when the bank's 6-year window actually closed. For a "credit
agreement" specifically, § 78B-2-309(2) goes even further than § 78B-2-113's
general debtor-only payment rule: it lets a payment made by a THIRD PARTY,
not just the debtor, also serve as the new starting date.

Is there a special rule for consumer debt?

No separate deadline-to-sue-on-the-debt rule was found. The same
§ 78B-2-307/§ 78B-2-309 periods apply to consumer and commercial debt alike.
The Utah Consumer Credit Code does set its own one-year period, but that
period applies to a different kind of claim entirely, a consumer's action
against a CREDITOR for violating the Code's disclosure and rate rules, not to how long the creditor has to sue on the underlying debt.

What if the debt originated in another state?

Utah uses a classic borrowing statute with a resident-plaintiff exception,
structurally similar to California's or New York's. Section 78B-2-103: a
claim that arose in another state and is already time-barred there "may not
be pursued in this state, unless the cause of action is held by a citizen
of this state who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued."

What actually happens once the deadline passes?

Utah goes a step beyond the bare affirmative-defense default. Section
78B-2-113(2) states that once "a right of action is barred by the
provisions of any statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of
action or ground for defense", a genuine statutory bar across the whole
limitations chapter, not limited to contract debt specifically. No Utah
statute specific to debt collectors was found separately barring a
third-party collector from suing on a time-barred debt; a 2023 law (H.B.
20) instead repealed a set of older debt-collection-agency registration and
bonding statutes as redundant, leaving Title 12's collection-fee cap as the
main surviving debt-collector-specific statute outside this chapter.

What trips people up

People sometimes still see an old secondary source describing § 78B-2-307
as covering BOTH the 6-year written period and the 4-year oral one in the
same section, that used to be true, but a 2023 amendment moved the
written-contract branch fully to § 78B-2-309, leaving § 78B-2-307 covering
only unwritten debt and open accounts; check which section a source is
actually quoting before relying on it. The bigger trap is on the revival
side: because Utah's rule computes the clock fresh from whichever of
several dates applies, with no cap limiting it to a still-running claim,
and because a bank-style credit agreement can even be restarted by a
THIRD PARTY's payment (not just the debtor's own), a debt that looks old
can be closer to timely than it appears once any payment activity is
accounted for.

Common questions

Is my written contract 6 years or my oral one 4 years, and what if I
can't tell which bucket applies?

Utah courts ask whether the fact of liability arises from the instrument
itself. If the answer is genuinely unclear, that ambiguity itself is worth
raising, since it can shift which of the two periods controls.

I made a payment on an old debt years after I stopped paying, did that
reset the clock?

Likely yes. Utah computes the limitations period fresh from the date of a
payment (or a written acknowledgment), with no language limiting this to a
debt that hadn't already run out.

If someone else made a payment on my loan, does that restart the clock
against me?

For a bank-style credit agreement specifically, yes, Utah's statute
allows a third party's payment, not just the debtor's own, to set a new
starting date.

Does moving to Utah from a state with a shorter deadline help a creditor
sue me here?

Not if you were already a Utah resident when the debt arose and have stayed
one the whole time, Utah's borrowing statute has a resident-plaintiff
exception protecting that scenario, but a claim that's already time-barred
elsewhere generally can't be revived just by suing in Utah otherwise.

Statutes and sources

  • Utah Code § 78B-2-309, "(1) An action may be brought within six years:
    ... (b) subject to Subsection (2), upon any contract, obligation, or
    liability founded upon an instrument in writing .... (2) For a credit
    agreement ..., the six-year period ... begins the later of the day on
    which: (a) the debt arose; (b) the debtor makes a written acknowledgment
    of the debt or a promise to pay the debt; or (c) the debtor or a third
    party makes a payment on the debt.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-S309_2019051420190514.pdf
    (accessed 2026-07-09)
  • Utah Code § 78B-2-307, "An action may be brought within four years: (1)
    after the last charge is made or the last payment is received: (a) upon a
    contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument in
    writing; (b) on an open store account ...; or (c) on an open account for
    work, labor or services rendered, or materials furnished.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-S307_2023050320230503.pdf
    (accessed 2026-07-09)
  • Utah Code § 70A-2-725, "(1) An action for breach of any contract for
    sale must be commenced within four years after the cause of action has
    accrued .... (2) A cause of action accrues when the breach occurs,
    regardless of the aggrieved party's lack of knowledge of the breach.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title70A/Chapter2/C70A-2-S725_1800010118000101.pdf
    (accessed 2026-07-09)
  • Utah Code § 78B-2-113, "(1) An action for recovery of a debt may be
    brought within the applicable statute of limitations from the date: (a)
    the debt arose; (b) a written acknowledgment of the debt or a promise to
    pay is made by the debtor; or (c) a payment is made on the debt by the
    debtor. (2) If a right of action is barred by the provisions of any
    statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of action or ground
    for defense.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-P1_1800010118000101.pdf
    (accessed 2026-07-09)
  • Utah Code § 78B-2-103, "A cause of action which arises in another
    jurisdiction, and which is not actionable in the other jurisdiction by
    reason of the lapse of time, may not be pursued in this state, unless the
    cause of action is held by a citizen of this state who has held the
    cause of action from the time it accrued.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-P1_1800010118000101.pdf
    (accessed 2026-07-09)

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Utah Code § 78B-2-309 · accessed 2026-07-09
Utah Code § 78B-2-307 · accessed 2026-07-09
Utah Code § 70A-2-725 · accessed 2026-07-09
Utah Code § 78B-2-113 · accessed 2026-07-09
Utah Code § 78B-2-103 · accessed 2026-07-09
This page is general legal information about the deadline to sue on an unpaid debt under state law, not legal advice about a specific debt. Whether a specific payment, statement, or communication restarted this state's clock, whether a debt is governed by this state's law at all (choice-of-law and borrowing-statute questions can be fact-specific), and how a particular court will treat a time-barred claim often depend on facts this page cannot resolve for you. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney before relying on it.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how Utah handles this in general. Ezel applies current Utah law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.