Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Utah
At a glance
| Governing law | Utah Code § 78B-2-309 (6yr, written contract/obligation/liability); § 78B-2-307 (4yr, unwritten contract/obligation/liability, open store account, or open account for services); § 70A-2-725 (4yr, UCC sale-of-goods debt); § 78B-2-113 (payment/acknowledgment revival, and the general statutory-bar-absolute rule); § 78B-2-103 (borrowing statute for a claim arising in another state) |
|---|---|
| Written contract/debt deadline | 6 years: § 78B-2-309(1)(b) covers any contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument in writing. Utah case law asks whether liability arises, is assumed, or is imposed from the instrument itself or its recitals (Bracklein; Brigham Young University). For a credit agreement, § 78B-2-309(2) starts the 6-year period on the latest of the debt date, a written acknowledgment or promise, or a debtor or third-party payment |
| Oral contract/open account deadline | 4 years, § 78B-2-307(1)(a) covers 'a contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument in writing,' running 'after the last charge is made or the last payment is received.' The same 4-year period and last-charge-or-payment trigger also covers an open store account for goods and an open account for work, labor, services, or materials (§ 78B-2-307(1)(b)-(c)), these open-account categories are grouped with the oral/unwritten bucket rather than getting a separate rule of their own |
| When the clock starts | Date of breach is the default, and Utah case law does not apply a general discovery toll to an ordinary contract claim (Brigham Young University). For an unwritten or open-account claim under § 78B-2-307(1), the trigger is the last charge made or last payment received, not the original charge date |
| Can a payment or promise restart the clock? | § 78B-2-113(1) provides generally that 'an action for recovery of a debt may be brought within the applicable statute of limitations from the date: (a) the debt arose; (b) a written acknowledgment of the debt or a promise to pay is made by the debtor; or (c) a payment is made on the debt by the debtor': whichever of these three dates is used, the clock is computed from that date forward, with no textual cap limiting this to a still-running (not-yet-expired) claim. A Utah Court of Appeals case, Daniels v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust (2021), applied this rule concretely: the last payment date, not the original default date, controlled when the 6-year period actually expired. For a 'credit agreement' specifically, § 78B-2-309(2) goes further than § 78B-2-113's general debtor-only payment rule, letting a payment by A THIRD PARTY (not just the debtor) also serve as the new starting date |
| Special rule for consumer debt | None found. The same § 78B-2-307/§ 78B-2-309 periods apply to consumer and commercial debt alike; Utah has no separate limitations period specifically for consumer-credit-transaction debt. The Utah Consumer Credit Code (Title 70C) sets its own one-year period for an action alleging a CREDITOR's violation of that Code's disclosure and rate rules: a different kind of claim (a statutory-violation claim against the creditor) than the deadline to sue ON the debt itself, which this survey covers |
| Out-of-state debt | A classic 'basic borrowing statute with a resident-plaintiff exception,' the same shape as California's and New York's. § 78B-2-103: 'A cause of action which arises in another jurisdiction, and which is not actionable in the other jurisdiction by reason of the lapse of time, may not be pursued in this state, unless the cause of action is held by a citizen of this state who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued' |
| What expiration actually does | § 78B-2-113(2) states that once 'a right of action is barred by the provisions of any statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of action or ground for defense': a real statutory bar, applying across all of Chapter 2's limitations periods, not just a bare affirmative-defense default. No Utah statute specific to debt collectors was found that separately bars a THIRD-PARTY collector from suing on a time-barred debt; a 2023 law (H.B. 20) instead repealed several older debt-collection-agency registration and bonding statutes as redundant, leaving Title 12's collection-fee limitation as the main surviving debt-collector-specific statute outside the ordinary limitations chapter |
Requirements one by one
Governing law
Utah's contract-debt deadlines live in Title 78B, Chapter 2 of the Utah Code. Section 78B-2-309 sets the 6-year period for a written contract, obligation, or liability. Section 78B-2-307 sets the 4-year period for an unwritten one, and also covers an open store account and an open account for services. A debt for the sale of goods gets its own 4-year period under § 70A-2-725, part of Utah's enactment of UCC Article 2. Section 78B-2-113 addresses revival by acknowledgment or payment, and also states the general effect of an established bar. Section 78B-2-103 sets Utah's borrowing statute for a debt that arose in another state.
How long you have on a written debt
Six years. Section 78B-2-309(1)(b) covers a contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument in writing. Utah case law asks whether liability arises, is assumed, or is imposed from the instrument itself or its recitals (Bracklein; Brigham Young University). For a credit agreement, a bank, credit union, or other financial institution's loan, credit extension, or financial accommodation, as defined in § 25-5-4, § 78B-2-309(2) adds a special accrual rule: the 6-year period begins on the LATEST of the day the debt arose, a written acknowledgment or promise to pay, or a payment made by the debtor OR a third party.
How long you have on an oral or unwritten debt
Four years. Section 78B-2-307(1)(a) covers a contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument in writing. The same 4-year period, running after the last charge is made or the last payment is received, also covers an open store account for goods (§ 78B-2-307(1)(b)) and an open account for work, labor, services, or materials furnished (§ 78B-2-307(1)(c)), both grouped into this unwritten bucket rather than getting their own separate rule.
When the clock starts
The default is the date of breach, and Utah case law does not import a general discovery toll into an ordinary contract claim. Brigham Young University applied the 6-year written-contract period even though the plaintiff had not discovered the underlying defect. For an unwritten or open-account claim under § 78B-2-307, the trigger is the last charge made or last payment received, not the first charge.
Can a payment or promise restart the clock?
Yes. Section 78B-2-113(1) provides generally that an action for recovery of a debt may be brought within the applicable limitations period "from the date: (a) the debt arose; (b) a written acknowledgment of the debt or a promise to pay is made by the debtor; or (c) a payment is made on the debt by the debtor", whichever of those three dates applies, the clock is computed from that point forward. Nothing in the text caps this to a still-running claim. A 2021 Utah Court of Appeals decision, Daniels v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust, illustrates the mechanic in practice: the homeowners' last loan payment date, not the original default date, controlled when the bank's 6-year window actually closed. For a "credit agreement" specifically, § 78B-2-309(2) goes even further than § 78B-2-113's general debtor-only payment rule: it lets a payment made by a THIRD PARTY, not just the debtor, also serve as the new starting date.
Is there a special rule for consumer debt?
No separate deadline-to-sue-on-the-debt rule was found. The same § 78B-2-307/§ 78B-2-309 periods apply to consumer and commercial debt alike. The Utah Consumer Credit Code does set its own one-year period, but that period applies to a different kind of claim entirely, a consumer's action against a CREDITOR for violating the Code's disclosure and rate rules, not to how long the creditor has to sue on the underlying debt.
What if the debt originated in another state?
Utah uses a classic borrowing statute with a resident-plaintiff exception, structurally similar to California's or New York's. Section 78B-2-103: a claim that arose in another state and is already time-barred there "may not be pursued in this state, unless the cause of action is held by a citizen of this state who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued."
What actually happens once the deadline passes?
Utah goes a step beyond the bare affirmative-defense default. Section 78B-2-113(2) states that once "a right of action is barred by the provisions of any statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of action or ground for defense", a genuine statutory bar across the whole limitations chapter, not limited to contract debt specifically. No Utah statute specific to debt collectors was found separately barring a third-party collector from suing on a time-barred debt; a 2023 law (H.B. 20) instead repealed a set of older debt-collection-agency registration and bonding statutes as redundant, leaving Title 12's collection-fee cap as the main surviving debt-collector-specific statute outside this chapter.
What trips people up
People sometimes still see an old secondary source describing § 78B-2-307 as covering BOTH the 6-year written period and the 4-year oral one in the same section, that used to be true, but a 2023 amendment moved the written-contract branch fully to § 78B-2-309, leaving § 78B-2-307 covering only unwritten debt and open accounts; check which section a source is actually quoting before relying on it. The bigger trap is on the revival side: because Utah's rule computes the clock fresh from whichever of several dates applies, with no cap limiting it to a still-running claim, and because a bank-style credit agreement can even be restarted by a THIRD PARTY's payment (not just the debtor's own), a debt that looks old can be closer to timely than it appears once any payment activity is accounted for.
Common questions
Is my written contract 6 years or my oral one 4 years, and what if I can't tell which bucket applies? Utah courts ask whether the fact of liability arises from the instrument itself. If the answer is genuinely unclear, that ambiguity itself is worth raising, since it can shift which of the two periods controls.
I made a payment on an old debt years after I stopped paying, did that reset the clock? Likely yes. Utah computes the limitations period fresh from the date of a payment (or a written acknowledgment), with no language limiting this to a debt that hadn't already run out.
If someone else made a payment on my loan, does that restart the clock against me? For a bank-style credit agreement specifically, yes, Utah's statute allows a third party's payment, not just the debtor's own, to set a new starting date.
Does moving to Utah from a state with a shorter deadline help a creditor sue me here? Not if you were already a Utah resident when the debt arose and have stayed one the whole time, Utah's borrowing statute has a resident-plaintiff exception protecting that scenario, but a claim that's already time-barred elsewhere generally can't be revived just by suing in Utah otherwise.
Statutes and sources
- Utah Code § 78B-2-309, "(1) An action may be brought within six years: ... (b) subject to Subsection (2), upon any contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument in writing .... (2) For a credit agreement ..., the six-year period ... begins the later of the day on which: (a) the debt arose; (b) the debtor makes a written acknowledgment of the debt or a promise to pay the debt; or (c) the debtor or a third party makes a payment on the debt.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-S309_2019051420190514.pdf (accessed 2026-07-09)
- Utah Code § 78B-2-307, "An action may be brought within four years: (1) after the last charge is made or the last payment is received: (a) upon a contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument in writing; (b) on an open store account ...; or (c) on an open account for work, labor or services rendered, or materials furnished.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-S307_2023050320230503.pdf (accessed 2026-07-09)
- Utah Code § 70A-2-725, "(1) An action for breach of any contract for sale must be commenced within four years after the cause of action has accrued .... (2) A cause of action accrues when the breach occurs, regardless of the aggrieved party's lack of knowledge of the breach.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title70A/Chapter2/C70A-2-S725_1800010118000101.pdf (accessed 2026-07-09)
- Utah Code § 78B-2-113, "(1) An action for recovery of a debt may be brought within the applicable statute of limitations from the date: (a) the debt arose; (b) a written acknowledgment of the debt or a promise to pay is made by the debtor; or (c) a payment is made on the debt by the debtor. (2) If a right of action is barred by the provisions of any statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of action or ground for defense.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-P1_1800010118000101.pdf (accessed 2026-07-09)
- Utah Code § 78B-2-103, "A cause of action which arises in another jurisdiction, and which is not actionable in the other jurisdiction by reason of the lapse of time, may not be pursued in this state, unless the cause of action is held by a citizen of this state who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued.", https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title78B/Chapter2/C78B-2-P1_1800010118000101.pdf (accessed 2026-07-09)
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
What does Utah law mean for your facts?
You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Utah law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace