Back to Federal guidance
Conditional PY 2007 SCSEP grant instructions
Summary ETA gave Senior Community Service Employment Program applicants instructions and allotments for conditional Program Year 2007 grants. The letter addressed new 2006 Older Americans Act requirements, including changes affecting participant benefits, while fuller planning instructions were pending. Four attachments contain application materials, funding, and contacts; ETA now labels the advisory Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 26-06
Date issued
June 11, 2007
Status
Withdrawn
ETA lists this program-year advisory Canceled as of 2026-10-24; its letter prints Rescissions: blank and Expiration Date: Continuing.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
Accessible letter PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2007/TEGL26-06acc.pdf
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING SCSEP
ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OWI/DAS
Washington, D.C. 20210
DATE
June 11, 2007
TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO 26-06
TO: ALL SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICE EMPLOYMENT
PROGRAM GRANTEES
FROM: EMILY STOVER DeROCCO /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Planning Instructions and Allotments for Program Year 2007
Conditional Grants for Senior Community Service Employment
Program Applicants
1. Purpose. To provide all Senior Community Service Employment Program
(SCSEP) applicants with instructions and procedures for conditional grants for
Program Year (PY) 2007, beginning July 1, 2007.
2. References. 2006 Older Americans Act (OAA) Amendments, Pub. L. 109-365
(OAA-2006); 20 CFR Part 641.
3. Background. The Department of Labor (the Department) delayed issuance of
full PY 2007 SCSEP grant planning instructions contingent on potential action
by the Congress on legislation authorizing an increase in the minimum wage.
The Congress did authorize that increase on May 24, 2007, and the President
signed the measure into law on May 25, 2007. The measure, which goes into
effect 60 days after enactment (i.e., July 24, 2007), will raise the minimum
wage to $7.25 an hour from $5.15 an hour in three stages over the course of
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
Continuing
three years. For PY 2007, the minimum wage will increase to $5.85 per hour.
The Fiscal Year 2007 appropriation for title V of the OAA is $483,611,000.
Authorized positions and funding are provided in Attachment III to this
TEGL.
In order to ensure that funds are obligated in a timely manner and to
safeguard continuity for participants in the short time period that remains
until the beginning of PY 2007, the Department has decided to issue
conditional SCSEP grants at this time.
Further, in the interest of expediency, the Department will use the project
narrative in the approved PY 2006 grants as the technical proposal for the
conditional PY 2007 grants. However, applicants must be aware that the new
requirements resulting from the enactment of OAA-2006 become effective
July 1, 2007, and that some of these requirements will immediately impact
grantee operations at that time. These include the new priorities for
participant recruitment and selection; establishment of uniform, documented
participant policies about whether or not to provide paid or unpaid sick leave
and Federal holiday pay when a grantee or sub-recipient’s business is closed;
and elimination of any annual leave, bonus or pension benefits. Accordingly,
applicants are urged to carefully review the OAA-2006, which is available in
its entirety on the Employment and Training Administration’s (ETA) Web site
at www.doleta.gov/seniors, in order to comply with all program
requirements that are effective July 1, 2007.
Subsequent to the issuance of these conditional grants, the Department will
issue another TEGL detailing full PY 2007 grant instructions and procedures.
This issuance will specifically ask grantees to address all the requirements of
OAA-2006 and ETA’s new strategic focus on incorporating the Workforce
Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) conceptual
framework in full technical proposals to be submitted to the Department.
4. Requirement. As indicated in the Background section, the approved PY 2006
project narrative will serve as the technical proposal for the PY 2007
conditional grants. However, applicants must submit a new signed SF-424, as
well as a SF-424A budget form and a minimal budget narrative.
In addition, applicants may elect to utilize the option provided at Section
502(c)(6)(C) of OAA-2006 in the conditional application process. This
provision permits grantees to request authority to use not less than 65% of
program funds for participant wages and fringe benefits, thereby freeing up
an additional 10% of funds for training and supportive services. Applicants
interested in pursuing this option must submit a brief description of the
additional training and supportive services they plan to provide along with
their SF-424, SF-424A, and budget narrative. This description should not
exceed two pages in length, and should also be included in the full proposal
that is submitted in response to the Department’s complete PY 2007 Grant
Planning Instructions and Allotments TEGL, once that TEGL is issued later
this year.
5. PY 2007 Program Allotments. See Attachment III for funding levels and
authorized positions.
6. Submission. Applicants must submit hard copy budget forms and narrative
via overnight delivery. An original and two copies of each budget form and
the narrative must be provided.
7. Schedule. Applicants must comply with the following timetable:
• Applicants must submit a hard copy signed SF-424, SF-424A, and budget
narrative and, if applicable, description of planned additional training and
supportive services via overnight delivery to the ETA Division of Adult
Services by June 18, 2007. An original and two copies of each document
must be provided. Applicants are encouraged to submit these materials
as soon as possible.
• Applicants should send these documents to:
Ms. Alexandra Kielty
Division of Adult Services
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Room S-4209
Washington, DC 20210
A hard copy, e-copy, disk or CD of these documents should also be sent to
the appropriate regional SCSEP contact as indicated in Attachment IV.
8. Action Required. Applicants for PY 2007 SCSEP national and State SCSEP
grants must submit these documents by June 18, 2007.
9. Inquiries. Questions may be directed to the appropriate regional SCSEP
contact.
10. Attachments.
I. Budget Information Instructions
II. SF-424 and SF-424A
III. Authorized Positions and Funding
IV. Regional SCSEP Contacts
Attachment 1 PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2007/TEGL26-06a1.pdf
ATTACHMENT I
BUDGET INFORMATION INSTRUCTIONS
The applicant must prepare the proposed budget using Standard Form (SF) 424 and 424A
(available in Adobe Acrobat format at http://www.doleta.gov/sga/forms.cfm).
Sections A, B, and C of the SF-424A should include budget estimates for the entire grant
period. In the past, in sections A and B applicants were asked to identify how costs
would be allocated among different functional areas, such as administration and
participant wages and fringe benefits. Applicants are no longer required to identify on
this form how costs are allocated among functional areas. However, applicants must
continue to follow the program requirements regarding the expenditure and reporting of
funds, including requirements regarding the proportion of funds to be spent in each
functional area.
The following instructions are intended to clarify the process of completing the SF-424
grant application and the SF-424A budget form. The current authorizing legislation and
regulations should be reviewed as well as OW Bulletin No. 00-20, Allocation of Indirect
Costs. Sufficient funding for administrative costs must go to the local levels of program
operation.
CLARIFYING INSTRUCTIONS FOR STANDARD FORM 424
If additional space is needed to complete an item, insert an asterisk and use an extra sheet
of paper. For the most part, this form is self-explanatory. Complete all applicable items.
Item 14. List the counties with the number of authorized positions to be placed in each
one. If the space on the form is not sufficient, please continue on a separate page. This
list must be consistent with the appropriate current individual State Equitable Distribution
plans.
Item 18. The Federal funding for Program Year 2007 conditional grants for all
applicants is listed in Attachment III.
CLARIFYING INSTRUCTIONS FOR STANDARD FORM 424-A
Section A - Budget Summary
Lines 1, Columns (a) and (b).
Under Column (a), enter “SCSEP.”
Under Column (b) on Line 1, enter “17.235”.
1
Line 1, Column (c) through (g). Enter in Columns (c) (Federal), and (d) (Non-Federal)
the appropriate amount of funds needed to support the project for the grant period, and in
column (g) enter the total. Leave Columns (e) and (f) blank.
Lines 2 – 4. Leave these lines blank.
Line 5. Show totals for Columns (c), (d), and (g). The non-Federal share must be no
less than 10 percent of the total cost of the project. The legislative requirement is found
in section 502(c)(1) of the OAA Amendments. Rules regarding States and non-Federal
funds are found in the administrative regulations, 29 CFR Part 97.24. Rules regarding
nonprofit and commercial organizations and non-Federal funds are found in the
administrative regulations, 29 CFR Part 95.23. Please indicate as a remark (on Line 23)
the specific source(s) and amounts (if known) of any non-Federal funds and include this
information in the detailed budget narrative.
Section B – Budget Categories
In the past, applicants were asked to identify the amount of grant funds budgeted for each
functional area by object class category; object class categories are listed in lines 6(a)
through 6(k). However, in section B of the SF - 424A applicants will no longer be asked
to identify how grant funds are budgeted by functional area, but instead to note the total
amount of funds for each object class category.
Lines 6a through 6h, Column 1. Show the estimated amount of Federal funds for each
direct object class category. All costs to be incurred under contracts or sub-grants should
be reflected in line 6f (Contractual). For the purposes of this budget, costs associated
with participant wages and fringe benefits should be categorized the following ways:
• When a participant has a community service employment assignment at the grantee’s
facilities and is considered an employee of the grantee, then participant wage costs
should be listed in “Personnel” and fringe benefits in “Fringe Benefits”
• When a participant has a community service employment assignment at a host agency
or sub-recipient’s facilities, but is considered an employee of the grantee, then
participant wage costs should be listed in “Personnel” and fringe benefits in “Fringe
Benefits”
• When a participant has a community service employment assignment at a host agency
or sub-recipient’s facilities, and is considered an employee of the host-agency or sub-
recipient, then participant wage and fringe benefit costs should be listed in
“Contractual”
Line 6i, Column 1. Show the total of entries made for lines 6a through 6h.
Line 6j, Column 1. Show the amount of indirect costs. A copy of the current indirect
cost rate agreement must be sent with the application. Applicants that do not have an in-
direct cost rate, but have more than one source of funds, are required to contact the
Department of Labor’s (DOL) Division of Cost Determination to determine the process
to follow to apply for an indirect cost rate.
2
Line 6k, Column 1. Enter the total of the amounts indicated on lines 6i and 6j. For all
applications, the total amount in Column (1), Line 6k, should be the same as the total
amount shown in Section A, Column (c), Line 5.
Line 7. Do not enter an estimate of program income expected to be generated from this
project. Note: Income generated by SCSEP projects must be used for SCSEP activities.
Section C – Source of Non-Federal Resources
Line 8. Enter amounts of non-Federal resources that will be used in the grant; do not
break down non-Federal resources by functional area.
Column (a). Enter “SCSEP.”
Column (b). Enter the amount of cash and/or in-kind contributions to be made by
the applicant.
Column (c). Enter the State(s) contribution. This requirement does not apply to
State grantees, when the State is the applicant.
Column (d). Enter the amount of cash and/or in-kind contributions to be made
from all other sources.
Column (e). Enter totals of Columns (b), (c), and (d). The amount under Column
(e) should be equal to the amount on Line 5, Column (d), Section A.
Line 12. Under each column enter the same figure entered in Line (8).
Section D - Forecasted Cash Needs
Make no entries.
Section E - Budget Estimates of Federal Funds Needed for Balance of Project
Make no entries.
Section F - Other Budget Information
Line 21 - Direct Charges. In the space provided type “A minimal budget narrative is
attached.”
You must provide a minimal budget narrative with the Grant Application Package. You
should prepare this and have available for inspection the basis for their estimated costs by
line item (including the detail for the "Other" line item). The cost breakout should reflect
the SF-424A so that totals match for both the form and the minimal budget narrative.
3
You should present information by line item and category, and you should indicate which
functional areas costs are associated with – administration, participants’ wages and fringe
benefits, and other participant costs.
The budget narrative must show costs that occur at the national and/or state and the local
level. The budget narrative should also indicate the non-Federal resources that will be
provided to support the project, and the organization(s) providing them.
You may consult with the regional SCSEP contact regarding the needed level of detail for
the PY 2007 conditional grants. In categorizing costs and their applicability, all
applicants must follow OAA 2006 Section 502(c) and the Regulations at 20 CFR Part
641 Subpart H, sections 641.847 - 641.876. Please also see the discussion of
administrative costs in the One-Stop Comprehensive Financial Management Guide at
http://www.doleta.gov/sga/pdf/FinalTAG_August_02.pdf, pages II-5-3 to II-5-6.
Other considerations: Successful applicants are expected to attend DOL- sponsored
training and should prepare their budgets accordingly. For example, you should allocate
funds to attend the meeting for SCSEP grantees to be held in conjunction with the
Workforce Innovations conference in 2007, and could allocate funds to attend the
financial and administrative training sponsored by ETA. In addition, you must have
current computer technology and ensure that your organization has the capability to link
to the Internet. Reporting will continue to be done via the Internet.
Line 22 - Indirect Charges. Enter the type of indirect rate (provisional, predetermined,
final, or fixed) that will be in effect during the grant period, and the nature and the
amount of the base to which the rate is applied, and the total indirect charges. Include a
copy of your agency’s approved indirect cost rate agreement. It should cover the entire
grant period. If not, state that a new one will be provided when available.
If you not have an indirect cost rate, but have more than one source of funds, you must
contact DOL’s Division of Cost Determination to determine the process to follow to
apply for an indirect cost rate.
Line 23 – Remarks. Provide any other explanations or comments deemed necessary. We
suggest entering the words “See attached minimal budget narrative” in this section.
4
Attachment 2 PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2007/TEGL26-06a2.pdf
ATTACHMENT II
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02
*1. Type of Submission: *2. Type of Application * If Revision, select appropriate letter(s)
Preapplication New
Application Continuation *Other (Specify)
Changed/Corrected Application Revision
3. Date Received : 4. Applicant Identifier:
5a. Federal Entity Identifier: *5b. Federal Award Identifier:
State Use Only:
6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier:
8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
*a. Legal Name:
*b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): *c. Organizational DUNS:
d. Address:
*Street 1:
Street 2:
*City:
County:
*State:
Province:
*Country:
*Zip / Postal Code
e. Organizational Unit:
Department Name: Division Name:
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:
Prefix: *First Name:
Middle Name:
*Last Name:
Suffix:
Title:
Organizational Affiliation:
*Telephone Number: Fax Number:
*Email:
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02
*9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:
Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:
Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
*Other (Specify)
*10 Name of Federal Agency:
11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:
CFDA Title:
*12 Funding Opportunity Number:
*Title:
13. Competition Identification Number:
Title:
14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
*15. Descriptive Title of Applicant’s Project:
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02
16. Congressional Districts Of:
*a. Applicant: *b. Program/Project:
17. Proposed Project:
*a. Start Date: *b. End Date:
18. Estimated Funding ($):
*a. Federal
*b. Applicant
*c. State
*d. Local
*e. Other
*f. Program Income
*g. TOTAL
*19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?
a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on
b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.
c. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372
*20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If “Yes”, provide explanation.)
Yes No
21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements
herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply
with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject
me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U. S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)
** I AGREE
** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or
agency specific instructions
Authorized Representative:
Prefix: *First Name:
Middle Name:
*Last Name:
Suffix:
*Title:
*Telephone Number: Fax Number:
* Email:
*Signature of Authorized Representative: *Date Signed:
Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424 (Revised 10/2005)
Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02
*Applicant Federal Debt Delinquency Explanation
The following should contain an explanation if the Applicant organization is delinquent of any Federal Debt.
OMB Approval No. 0348-0044
BUDGET INFORMATION
SECTION A - BUDGET SUMMARY
Grant Program,
Function Federal Estimated Unobligated Funds New or Revised Budget
or Catalog No.
Activity Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. TOTALS
SECTION B - BUDGET CATEGORIES
6. Object Class Categories - Grant Program, Function or Activity Total
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
a. Personnel
b. Fringe Benefits
c. Travel
d. Equipment
e. Supplies
f. Contractual
g. Construction
h. Other
i. Total Direct Charges
j. Indirect Charges
k. TOTALS
l. Program Income
Page 3
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Form 424A (Rev. 7-97)
Previous Edition Usable Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES – ADMINISTRATION ON AGING OMB Approval No. 0348-0044
SECTION C - NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES
(a) Grant Program (b) APPLICANT (c) STATE (d) OTHER SOURCES (e) TOTALS
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. TOTALS
SECTION D - FORECASTED CASH NEEDS
Total for 1st Year 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
13. Federal
14. Non-Federal
15. TOTAL
SECTION E - BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJECT
(a) Grant Program FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS (YEARS)
(b) FIRST (c) SECOND (d) THIRD (e) FOURTH
16.
17.
18.
19.
20. TOTALS
SECTION F - OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
21 Direct Charges:
22. Indirect Charges:
23. Remarks:
PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Attach per instruction)
Page 4
Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424A (Rev. 7-97)
Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
Attachment 3 PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2007/TEGL26-06a3.pdf
ATTACHMENT III
Authorized Positions
and Funding
Attachment III-A
USDOL/ETA
Senior Community Service Employment Program
PY 2007 Authorized Positions and Funding*
for State Agencies and Territories, by State
States Positions Dollars
State Agencies
Alabama 224 $1,777,641
Alaska 258 2,051,727
Arizona 161 1,276,456
Arkansas 220 1,746,317
California 1,035 8,230,400
Colorado 122 971,046
Connecticut 132 1,049,357
Delaware 258 2,051,727
District of Col 70 556,003
Florida 712 5,661,826
Georgia 268 2,130,037
Hawaii 258 2,051,727
Idaho 64 510,814
Illinois 470 3,735,396
Indiana 316 2,513,757
Iowa 155 1,229,470
Kansas 123 978,878
Kentucky 230 1,824,627
Louisiana 204 1,621,021
Maine 75 595,158
Maryland 166 1,323,442
Massachusetts 263 2,090,882
Michigan 403 3,202,886
Minnesota 287 2,278,826
Mississippi 150 1,190,314
Missouri 299 2,372,798
Montana 76 602,989
Nebraska 93 736,115
Nevada 64 510,814
New Hampshire 64 510,814
New Jersey 341 2,709,532
New Mexico 68 540,340
New York 798 6,343,125
North Carolina 316 2,513,757
North Dakota 73 579,495
Ohio 527 4,189,595
Oklahoma 194 1,542,711
Oregon 177 1,409,583
Pennsylvania 646 5,137,148
Puerto Rico 166 1,315,611
Rhode Island 65 516,848
South Carolina 165 1,307,780
South Dakota 84 665,636
Tennessee 246 1,957,754
Texas 670 5,325,092
Utah 81 642,144
Vermont 67 532,509
Virginia 262 2,083,051
Washington 178 1,417,414
West Virginia 136 1,080,680
Wisconsin 309 2,458,940
Wyoming 64 510,814
State Agencies Total 12,853 $102,162,824
Territories
American Samoa 137 1,088,125
Guam 137 1,088,125
Northern Marianas 46 362,708
Virgin Islands 137 1,088,125
Territories Total 457 $3,627,083
* Based on cost per position of $7,949, with enacted minimum wage increase effective 7/24/07
U. S. Department of Labor / Employment & Training Administration Attachment III-B
Senior Community Service Employment Program
PY 2007 Authorized Positions* for Non-Minority National Sponsors, by State
State AARP ABLE ANPPM ES EW GII Mature NCBA NCOA NULI QCSI SER SSAI TWI VATD Total
Alabama 0 0 0 258 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 617 0 0 875
Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Arizona 157 0 167 0 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 461
Arkansas 242 0 0 0 463 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 860
California 482 0 539 0 417 0 0 0 309 0 0 1,344 506 0 0 3,597
Colorado 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 292 0 0 0 477
Connecticut 0 0 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272 0 518
Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
District of Col 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 271
Florida 1,827 0 0 0 572 0 0 198 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 2,785
Georgia 366 0 0 0 496 0 0 0 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,046
Hawaii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Idaho 0 0 0 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 227
Illinois 242 0 0 232 394 0 0 124 0 0 0 226 529 0 0 1,747
Indiana 309 0 0 0 368 272 0 0 0 0 0 0 286 0 0 1,235
Iowa 204 0 0 0 277 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 605
Kansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 465 0 0 0 465
Kentucky 201 0 0 0 451 0 0 0 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 895
Louisiana 165 0 210 0 252 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 722
Maine 0 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 291
Maryland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 649 0 0 649
Massachusetts 0 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 0 0 509 0 0 966
Michigan 480 0 0 0 513 0 0 260 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 1,503
Minnesota 0 0 0 0 505 0 0 0 0 0 204 0 387 0 0 1,096
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 274 0 0 583
Missouri 347 0 0 0 789 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,136
Montana 0 0 0 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 294
Nebraska 0 0 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 349
Nevada 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 232
New Hampshire 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 227
New Jersey 0 0 0 456 240 0 0 0 466 173 0 0 0 0 0 1,335
New Mexico 0 0 0 0 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 227
New York 662 0 0 496 529 0 0 0 440 255 0 0 654 0 0 3,036
North Carolina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 213 0 0 0 671 0 0 1,235
North Dakota 0 0 0 0 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 283
Ohio 345 0 0 0 490 0 695 188 0 181 0 0 159 0 0 2,058
Oklahoma 332 0 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 567
Oregon 0 0 0 235 460 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 695
Pennsylvania 487 0 150 0 273 276 0 233 663 155 0 0 237 0 0 2,474
Puerto Rico 244 0 0 0 405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 649
Rhode Island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 250
South Carolina 269 0 0 0 374 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 643
South Dakota 0 0 0 0 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 293
Tennessee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202 0 0 0 762 0 0 964
Texas 1,303 0 0 0 566 0 0 0 0 0 0 393 277 0 0 2,539
Utah 0 0 0 315 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315
Vermont 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 258 258
Virginia 324 0 0 0 115 296 0 0 262 0 0 0 0 0 0 997
Washington 345 0 0 0 0 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 612
West Virginia 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 401 0 0 0 0 0 0 530
Wisconsin 0 0 0 0 475 0 0 0 0 0 0 337 360 0 0 1,172
Wyoming 0 0 0 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 227
Total 9,750 778 1,149 2,238 11,635 1,475 695 1,832 3,478 1,211 204 3,495 7,001 272 258 45,471
* Based on cost per position of $7,949, with enacted minimum wage increase effective 7/24/07
U. S. Department of Labor / Employment & Training Administration Attachment III-C
Senior Community Service Employment Program
PY 2007 Authorized Funding* for Non-Minority National Sponsors, by State
State AARP ABLE ANPPM ES EW GII Mature NCBA NCOA NULI QCSI SER SSAI TWI VATD Total
Alabama $0 $0 $0 $2,047,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,906,494 $0 $0 $6,953,594
Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Arizona 1,244,815 0 1,328,424 0 0 1,087,784 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,661,023
Arkansas 1,923,146 0 0 0 3,684,278 0 0 1,228,578 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,836,002
California 3,830,635 0 4,283,006 0 3,318,697 0 0 0 2,455,767 0 0 10,685,457 4,024,756 0 0 28,598,318
Colorado 1,473,244 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,321,050 0 0 0 3,794,294
Connecticut 0 0 0 1,958,499 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,165,052 0 4,123,551
Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
District of Col 0 0 662,637 0 0 0 0 1,493,212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,155,849
Florida 14,522,669 0 0 0 4,549,495 0 0 1,573,511 0 0 0 1,492,936 0 0 0 22,138,611
Georgia 2,907,369 0 0 0 3,944,018 0 0 0 1,466,271 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,317,658
Hawaii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Idaho 0 0 0 0 1,807,234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,807,234
Illinois 1,921,729 0 0 1,842,096 3,135,373 0 0 987,887 0 0 0 1,794,625 4,201,958 0 0 13,883,668
Indiana 2,455,038 0 0 0 2,928,559 2,162,306 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,276,929 0 0 9,822,832
Iowa 1,620,909 0 0 0 2,201,459 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 983,216 0 0 4,805,584
Kansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,700,221 0 0 0 3,700,221
Kentucky 1,596,076 0 0 0 3,582,661 0 0 0 1,931,645 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,110,382
Louisiana 1,312,326 0 1,669,977 0 2,004,358 0 0 0 751,818 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,738,479
Maine 0 2,312,638 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,312,638
Maryland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,158,359 0 0 5,158,359
Massachusetts 0 2,068,939 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,569,347 0 0 4,044,376 0 0 7,682,662
Michigan 3,811,709 0 0 0 4,074,280 0 0 2,068,418 0 1,985,078 0 0 0 0 0 11,939,485
Minnesota 0 0 0 0 4,017,701 0 0 0 0 0 1,622,412 0 3,077,357 0 0 8,717,470
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 1,380,638 0 0 1,069,915 0 0 0 0 2,174,723 0 0 4,625,276
Missouri 2,755,162 0 0 0 6,268,046 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,023,208
Montana 0 0 0 0 2,336,156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,336,156
Nebraska 0 0 0 0 2,775,166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,775,166
Nevada 1,842,271 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,842,271
New Hampshire 0 1,807,234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,807,234
New Jersey 0 0 0 3,621,920 1,905,543 0 0 0 3,703,946 1,375,368 0 0 0 0 0 10,606,777
New Mexico 0 0 0 0 0 1,807,234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,807,234
New York 5,262,240 0 0 3,939,424 4,203,846 0 0 0 3,493,625 2,025,645 0 0 5,197,211 0 0 24,121,991
North Carolina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,789,804 1,689,611 0 0 0 5,335,578 0 0 9,814,993
North Dakota 0 0 0 0 2,249,922 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,249,922
Ohio 2,741,784 0 0 0 3,896,874 0 5,526,107 1,493,617 0 1,438,813 0 0 1,263,740 0 0 16,360,935
Oklahoma 2,640,301 0 0 0 1,867,383 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,507,684
Oregon 0 0 0 1,865,108 3,653,866 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,518,974
Pennsylvania 3,867,239 0 1,194,210 0 2,172,470 2,193,166 0 1,853,266 5,273,343 1,234,987 0 0 1,880,503 0 0 19,669,184
Puerto Rico 1,938,494 0 0 0 3,219,865 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,158,359
Rhode Island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,991,220 0 0 0 1,991,220
South Carolina 2,140,984 0 0 0 2,970,338 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,111,322
South Dakota 0 0 0 0 2,328,317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,328,317
Tennessee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,607,499 0 0 0 6,059,485 0 0 7,666,984
Texas 10,353,960 0 0 0 4,499,752 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,122,847 2,202,189 0 0 20,178,748
Utah 0 0 0 2,500,785 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500,785
Vermont 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,053,936 2,053,936
Virginia 2,574,730 0 0 0 912,009 2,356,610 0 0 2,082,337 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,925,686
Washington 2,745,584 0 0 0 0 2,122,716 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,868,300
West Virginia 0 0 0 0 1,027,346 0 0 0 3,190,279 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,217,625
Wisconsin 0 0 0 0 3,774,804 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,675,720 2,862,744 0 0 9,313,268
Wyoming 0 0 0 0 1,807,234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,807,234
Total 77,482,414 6,188,811 9,138,254 17,774,932 92,497,688 11,729,816 5,526,107 14,558,208 27,646,141 9,629,238 1,622,412 27,784,076 55,649,618 2,165,052 2,053,936 361,446,703
* Based on cost per position of $7,949, with enacted minimum wage increase effective 7/24/07
Attachment III-D
U. S. Department of Labor / Employment & Training Administration
Senior Community Service Employment Program
PY 2007 Authorized Positions* for Minority National Sponsors, by State
State IID NAPCA NICOA Total
Alabama 0 0 0 0
Alaska 0 0 0 0
Arizona 0 0 177 177
Arkansas 74 0 0 74
California 0 354 89 443
Colorado 0 0 0 0
Connecticut 0 0 0 0
Delaware 0 0 0 0
District of Col 0 0 0 0
Florida 0 0 0 0
Georgia 0 0 0 0
Hawaii 0 0 0 0
Idaho 0 0 0 0
Illinois 0 89 0 89
Indiana 0 0 0 0
Iowa 0 0 0 0
Kansas 0 0 0 0
Kentucky 0 0 0 0
Louisiana 97 0 0 97
Maine 0 0 0 0
Maryland 0 0 0 0
Massachusetts 0 63 0 63
Michigan 0 0 0 0
Minnesota 0 0 28 28
Mississippi 35 0 0 35
Missouri 0 0 0 0
Montana 0 0 0 0
Nebraska 0 0 0 0
Nevada 0 0 0 0
New Hampshire 0 0 0 0
New Jersey 0 0 0 0
New Mexico 0 0 64 64
New York 0 85 0 85
North Carolina 0 0 0 0
North Dakota 0 0 0 0
Ohio 0 0 0 0
Oklahoma 0 0 187 187
Oregon 0 0 0 0
Pennsylvania 0 79 0 79
Puerto Rico 0 0 0 0
Rhode Island 0 0 0 0
South Carolina 0 0 0 0
South Dakota 0 0 42 42
Tennessee 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 81 0 81
Utah 0 0 0 0
Vermont 0 0 0 0
Virginia 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 83 0 83
West Virginia 0 0 0 0
Wisconsin 0 0 38 38
Wyoming 0 0 0 0
Total 206 834 625 1,665
* Based on cost per position of $7,949, with enacted minimum wage increase effective 7/24/07
Attachment III-E
U. S. Department of Labor / Employment & Training Administration
Senior Community Service Employment Program
PY 2007 Authorized Funding* for Minority National Sponsors, by State
State IID NAPCA NICOA Total
Alabama $0 $0 $0 $0
Alaska 0 0 0 0
Arizona 0 0 1,408,441 1,408,441
Arkansas 591,714 0 0 591,714
California 0 2,812,058 708,001 3,520,059
Colorado 0 0 0 0
Connecticut 0 0 0 0
Delaware 0 0 0 0
District of Col 0 0 0 0
Florida 0 0 0 0
Georgia 0 0 0 0
Hawaii 0 0 0 0
Idaho 0 0 0 0
Illinois 0 704,962 0 704,962
Indiana 0 0 0 0
Iowa 0 0 0 0
Kansas 0 0 0 0
Kentucky 0 0 0 0
Louisiana 767,345 0 0 767,345
Maine 0 0 0 0
Maryland 0 0 0 0
Massachusetts 0 499,341 0 499,341
Michigan 0 0 0 0
Minnesota 0 0 220,245 220,245
Mississippi 279,807 0 0 279,807
Missouri 0 0 0 0
Montana 0 0 0 0
Nebraska 0 0 0 0
Nevada 0 0 0 0
New Hampshire 0 0 0 0
New Jersey 0 0 0 0
New Mexico 0 0 504,859 504,859
New York 0 673,345 0 673,345
North Carolina 0 0 0 0
North Dakota 0 0 0 0
Ohio 0 0 0 0
Oklahoma 0 0 1,486,380 1,486,380
Oregon 0 0 0 0
Pennsylvania 0 625,986 0 625,986
Puerto Rico 0 0 0 0
Rhode Island 0 0 0 0
South Carolina 0 0 0 0
South Dakota 0 0 330,209 330,209
Tennessee 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 641,662 0 641,662
Utah 0 0 0 0
Vermont 0 0 0 0
Virginia 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 658,066 0 658,066
West Virginia 0 0 0 0
Wisconsin 0 0 298,817 298,817
Wyoming 0 0 0 0
Total 1,638,866 6,615,420 4,956,952 13,211,238
* Based on cost per position of $7,949, with enacted minimum wage increase effective 7/24/07
Attachment 4 PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2007/TEGL26-06a4.pdf
ATTACHMENT IV
Regional SCSEP Contacts
ATTACHMENT IV
REGIONAL SCSEP CONTACTS
Region 1 – Boston
Dana Bourne
Federal Project Officer
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
JFK Federal Building, Room E-350
Boston, MA 02203
Ph: (617) 788-0122
Fax: (617) 788-0125
E-mail: [email protected]
State Grantees
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire
New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
National Grantees
National Able Network (NAN), The Workplace, Inc. (TWI),
Vermont Associates for Training and Development, Inc. (VATD)
Region 2 – Philadelphia
Chantal Watler
Federal Project Officer
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
The Curtis Center
170 S. Independence Mall West
Suite 825E
Philadelphia, PA 19106-3315
Ph: (215) 861-5224
Fax: (215) 861-5620
E-mail: [email protected]
State Grantees
Delaware, Washington D.C., Maryland, Pennsylvania
Virginia, West Virginia
1
National Grantees
AARP Foundation (AARP), Asociacion Nacional Pro Personas Mayores
(ANPPM), Easter Seals, Inc. (ES), Experience Works, Inc (EW), Goodwill
Industries International, Inc. (GII), Institute for Indian Development, Inc. (IID),
National Asian Pacific Center on Aging (NAPCA), National Caucus and Center
on Black Aged, Inc. (NCCBA), National Urban League, Inc. (NUL), National
Council on the Aging, Inc.(NCOA), National Indian Council on the Aging
(NICOA), Senior Service America, Inc. (SSAI), SER-Jobs for Progress, Inc.
(SER)
Region 3 – Atlanta
Deborah Bradley
Federal Project Officer
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
61 Forsyth Street, Suite 6M12
Atlanta, GA 30303
Ph: (404) 302-5379
Fax: (404) 302-5386
E-mail: [email protected]
State Grantees
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi
North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Region 4 – Dallas
Marilyn Brandenburg
Federal Project Officer
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
525 S. Griffin Street, Suite 317
Dallas, TX 75202
Ph: (214) 767-2257
Fax: (214) 767-4952
E-mail: [email protected]
State Grantees
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Colorado,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming, Texas
2
Region 5 – Chicago
Celeste Moerle
Federal Project Officer
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
230 S. Dearborn Street, 6th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
Ph: (312) 596-5422
Fax: (312) 596-5401
E-mail: [email protected]
State Grantees
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan Minnesota, Ohio, Iowa
Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Wisconson
National Grantees
Mature Services, Inc. (MS), Quality Career Services, Inc. (QCSI)
Region 6 – San Francisco
Ingrid Nyberg
Federal Project Officer
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
90 7th Street, Suite 17-300
San Francisco, CA 94103
Ph: (415) 625-7947
Fax: (415) 625-7903
E-mail: [email protected]
States
Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Alaska
Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Guam, Northern Marianas,
American Samoa
3
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace