← Browse all forms UD-110

Judgment, Unlawful Detainer

Fill it with Ezel. AI intake, blocker review, court-ready PDF.

California · After the tenant defaults or after trial.

File UD-110 with Ezel

Fill UD-110 with Ezel

$49 one-time, 30-day workspace

AI-assisted intake, completeness review, and a court-ready PDF for UD-110 only. Print, sign in pen, file yourself.

Secure payment via Stripe. By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

What Ezel does with UD-110

Tell Ezel what's going on. The rest is automatic.

Court Filing
Ezel is reading your story…
What Ezel did:
    You describe, Ezel fills. Need help on any field while you fill your form? Tap the question mark and ask. Start filing

    What is UD-110?

    Proposed judgment in a California unlawful detainer (eviction) case. The plaintiff (landlord) prepares it after the tenant defaults or after a court trial; the clerk or judge signs the actual judgment.

    What happens if you miss the deadline: There is no automatic loss of rights from waiting, but holdover damages keep accruing while possession is delayed and writs of execution take time to enforce.

    How to file

    Filing fee
    There is no separate filing fee for submitting UD-110 itself; the first-appearance fee for the unlawful detainer was already paid at filing of the complaint. The Writ of Execution (EJ-130) issued after UD-110 has its own modest fee, typically $25-$40, and the sheriff or marshal charges a separate fee to serve the writ and conduct the lockout (typically $125-$250 depending on county). Plaintiffs who qualify can request a fee waiver on FW-001 for the writ-issuance fee.
    Filing method
    in-person, mail, efile (county-specific; many California counties accept e-filing for unlawful detainer judgments)
    Filing deadline
    There is no fixed statutory deadline to submit UD-110. The plaintiff becomes eligible to request entry of default once the tenant's response window under CCP section 1167 has expired without an answer: 10 court days after personal service of the summons (section 1167(a)), or 15 court days after service by mail or through the Secretary of State's Safe at Home program (section 1167(b), the +5 court day extension). Section 1167 was amended by AB 2347 (Stats. 2024, ch. 512), effective 01/01/2025; the prior 5-court-day rule does not apply to cases filed on or after that date. After CIV-100 is granted and default is entered, the plaintiff may submit UD-110 immediately. Most California courts ask plaintiffs to submit the proposed judgment with the CIV-100 itself, or shortly after. Practical tip: many local courts issue case-management orders requiring the judgment to be requested within a specific window (often 30-60 days after service of summons); check local rules.
    How to serve
    No service of UD-110 on the defendant is required before submission, the defendant has defaulted (or, after a trial, was a party). After the clerk or judge signs the judgment, the clerk mails a copy to the parties of record. If using the court-default path with money damages, the plaintiff's CIV-100 must reflect that the Request for Entry of Default was mailed to the defendant's last known address (CIV-100 item 1c).
    Wet signature
    Yes, sign in pen after printing.
    Notarization
    No
    Original and copies
    Submit one original to the clerk plus two copies (one for the plaintiff's records, one for the sheriff/marshal when later applying for the writ). The clerk retains the original after entry; conformed copies are returned to the plaintiff.

    Common pitfalls

    Two highest-leverage checks for the AI review on UD-110. (1) Path coherence: the top-of-form 'By Clerk / By Court / By Default / Possession Only / After Court Trial' boxes must agree with item 1 (default) or item 2 (after trial) below. A common pro-se mistake is checking 'By Clerk' and 'By Default' but also filling the trial date in item 2a. The review should flag any inconsistency between top-of-form path indicators and the items filled in. (2) Premises address: item 4 must match the address in the complaint exactly; mismatches cause the sheriff to return the writ unserved.

    Don't memorize the rules. Ezel walks you through UD-110 field by field, flags what the AI review treats as a blocker, and renders a court-ready PDF.

    Start filing →

    You'll likely also file

    Other Ezel-supported forms that commonly file alongside UD-110. Each one has its own guided fill, AI review, and PDF render.

    CIV-100
    Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter Default)
    Default-path precursor: CIV-100 (Request for Entry of Default) must be filed and granted before UD-110 can enter on the default path (UD-110 item 1, BY DEFAULT). CIV-100 is the landlord's request to the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 585(b) once 5 days have passed after personal service of summons (CCP 1167 five-day window, with CCP 12a extending the deadline if the fifth day is a weekend or holiday) and the tenant has not appeared by filing UD-105, a demurrer under CCP 430.20, a motion to quash under CCP 418.10, or another responsive pleading. Once the clerk enters default, CIV-100 routes the case to one of two outcomes that determine which UD-110 box the landlord checks. CCP 1169 first sentence produces a clerk's judgment for possession only, where the landlord submits a UD-110 limited to a writ for possession (the clerk signs without judicial action and the landlord can take UD-110 directly to EJ-130 issuance of a writ of possession under CCP 715.010 to the sheriff). CCP 1169 second sentence produces a court's judgment for possession plus money damages (unpaid rent listed on the UD-100 complaint, holdover damages at the daily fair-rental value under CCP 1174 and Civil Code section 1951.2, prejudgment interest under Civil Code section 3287, attorney's fees per a lease prevailing-party clause or CCP 1717, costs of suit under CCP 1033.5), which requires either CIV-100 item 2 prove-up declarations on documentary evidence under CCP 585(d) or a short evidentiary prove-up hearing where a judge signs UD-110. CIV-100 is not needed on the trial path (UD-110 item 2, After Court Trial), which is reached only after a tenant files UD-105 within the CCP 1167 window and a contested trial is set by UD-150 under CCP 1170.5 (UD trial must occur within 20 days of the trial-setting request). Many counties require CIV-100 and a proposed UD-110 filed together on the default path; submitting CIV-100 alone leaves the landlord with default entry but no enforceable judgment to take to EJ-130, and the tenant retains possession until the writ of possession issues. If the landlord wants to reach unknown occupants in the unit, the original summons should have included a Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession under CCP 415.46 served alongside the UD-100; without that, a separate post-judgment Claim of Right procedure under CCP 1174.25 is required before the sheriff can enforce the writ against unnamed occupants. A defaulted tenant can move to set aside under CCP 473(b) (mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, within 6 months of entry) or CCP 473.5 (failure to receive actual notice, within the earlier of 180 days after default entry or 2 years after judgment); a granted motion vacates both default and UD-110, returning the tenant to the case at the point the response deadline passed. The masking rule at CCP 1161.2 limits public access to the UD case file for 60 days after filing and indefinitely if the tenant prevails; a defaulted UD-110 unmasks the file unless the tenant later wins a set-aside under CCP 473(b) or CCP 473.5.
    UD-105
    Answer to Unlawful Detainer
    Answer (Unlawful Detainer). UD-105 is the tenant's answer to the landlord's UD-100 complaint and gates the trial path on UD-110; once UD-105 is filed within the 5-day window under CCP 1167 (specifically 5 court days from personal service of UD-100 plus UD-110-PI summons under CCP 1167.4 (a)) the case cannot be defaulted via CIV-100, so the landlord's only path to UD-110 is a contested trial set by UD-150 under CCP 1170.5(a)-(c) (20-day setting window from issue joinder; CCP 1170.5(a) requires the court to set trial 'not later than 20 days after the first request to set the case for trial'). UD-110 then enters after the bench trial verdict via items 2.a through 2.d (After Court Trial; UD-110 item 2 expressly notes the jury was waived) or after a jury verdict via items 2.e / 2.f if a jury was demanded on UD-150 item 5.a and the $150 first-day jury fee was posted under CCP 631(b)(1) and remaining-day fees of $150 per day were posted under CCP 631(e). UD-110's caption, parties, and case number must match the UD-105 on file letter-for-letter; a mismatch in the tenant's name or the property address is a clerk-rejection trigger because the court file indexes by the UD-105 caption. Affirmative defenses on UD-105 item 3 that shape the UD-110 record. (a) Breach of warranty of habitability under Civil Code section 1941, 1941.1, 1942, and Green v. Superior Court (10 Cal.3d 616), with retaliation protection under CC 1942.5; a tenant who proves the implied warranty defense to a partial offset will see UD-110 items 7 and 8 award reduced rent and holdover damages reflecting the percentage rent abatement under Cazares v. Ortiz (109 Cal.App.3d Supp. 23) or Knight v. Hallsthammar (29 Cal.3d 46). (b) Retaliation under CC 1942.5(c) and (d) (180-day rebuttable presumption when the tenant exercised statutory rights; affirmative defense to all unlawful detainer); a winning tenant prevails outright on UD-110. (c) Discrimination under Government Code section 12955 and 42 USC 3604 (Fair Housing Act); also outright defense. (d) Improper or defective 3-day notice under CCP 1161(2), 1161(3), or 60-day no-cause notice defects under CC 1946.1; defective notice is jurisdictional and results in UD-110 entered for the tenant (Lamanna v. Vognar, 17 Cal.App.4th Supp. 4; Hinman v. Wagnon, 172 Cal.App.2d 24). (e) AB 1482 just cause / Tenant Protection Act of 2019 defenses under CC 1946.2 (good cause required for covered tenancies; relocation assistance for no-fault termination under CC 1946.2(d)). (f) COVID-19 protections that survive: CCP 1179.01-1179.05 (COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act, sunset but still litigated for arrears from 03/01/20 through 09/30/21); CCP 1179.07 (rental arrears repayment agreement). (g) Local rent control / just cause (Costa-Hawkins limits at CC 1954.50-1954.535 preempt some local rent control of new construction, but vacancy control and just cause evictions are local prerogative under SB 1078 and local ordinance). Procedural unlocks from filing UD-105. (1) Discovery rights under CCP 2030.010 et seq. with the unlawful detainer special discovery limits at CCP 2024.020 (motion deadlines truncated to 5 days). (2) Right to deposition under CCP 2025.010. (3) Right to summary judgment under CCP 437c with the 5-day notice carve for unlawful detainer under CCP 1170.5(b). (4) Mandatory settlement conference in many counties under local UD case management rule (Los Angeles Superior Court Local Rule 3.213). (5) Cottle motion (motion in limine to exclude evidence not produced in discovery, Cottle v. Superior Court 3 Cal.App.4th 1367; common in UD trial). (6) Demurrer under CCP 1170 (3-day filing window). The tenant's UD-105 answer also unlocks the tenant's right to a 5-day judgment masking under CCP 1161.2(a)(1) so the filing of the UD-100 is shielded from public view for 60 days, becoming permanent if the tenant prevails or the case is dismissed (the UD-110 outcome controls the 60-day public-view decision; a settlement masked under CCP 1161.2(a)(1) keeps the file masked forever). Stipulated judgment / settlement path. The most common UD-110 endpoint after UD-105 is a stipulated judgment under CCP 664.6 (the family-law version of the stipulated judgment vehicle, but applicable in UD); tenants negotiate negotiated move-out time (often 30 to 60 days), zero or reduced money judgment, and continued judgment masking under CCP 1161.2 in exchange for stipulated possession. The stipulated UD-110 enters with item 2.g (stipulated judgment) checked and the move-out date specified in item 6 or 11. CCP 1161.2(a)(1) masking survives the stipulated UD-110 if the parties so stipulate or if the tenant prevails on a key affirmative defense. Trial outcome paths captured on UD-110. (a) Landlord wins outright on possession: items 1 and 2 checked (judgment for plaintiff); item 6 awards possession; items 7-9 award past-due rent + holdover damages + attorneys' fees (if contractual fee clause under CC 1717). (b) Tenant wins outright: judgment for defendant under item 1.b; CCP 1032(b) and 1033.5 award costs to prevailing tenant (filing fee, service fee, witness fees, etc.); CC 1717 attorneys' fees if contract has reciprocal fee clause (Hsu v. Abbara, 9 Cal.4th 863, holding section 1717 fees are mandatory to prevailing tenant under reciprocal landlord-favored fee clause). (c) Mixed: tenant prevails on rent amount but landlord wins possession via UD-110 items 6 and 7 reduced. (d) Habitability offset: UD-110 item 7 holds money portion in abatement, item 8 reduces holdover damages to net of offset. (e) Statutory damages under CC 1942.4 (landlord rented uninhabitable unit while withholding required notice); CC 1947.10 (retaliatory eviction damages of $100 to $2,000 plus actual).
    UD-150
    Request/Counter-Request to Set Case for Trial, Unlawful Detainer
    Request/Counter-Request to Set Case for Trial. UD-150 is the precursor for the contested-trial path that ends in UD-110: when the tenant filed UD-105 (Answer) within the 5-day window under Code of Civil Procedure section 1167, the case avoids default and either party can file UD-150 to demand a trial. CCP 1170.5(a) requires the trial to be set within 20 days of the UD-150 demand, the tightest civil trial-setting window in California; CCP 1170.5(b) lets the court continue beyond 20 days only on a finding of good cause, and CCP 1170.5(c) requires a verbatim record (reporter or stipulated electronic) when a party so requests for appeal preservation. The other side may file a counter-request on the same UD-150 within 5 days of service of the first UD-150 under CCP 1170.8, with service via POS-030 by mail under CCP 1013(a). UD-150 elections drive UD-110: jury trial selected on UD-150 item 5.a with jury fees posted under CCP 631(b)(1) (deposit due 5 court days before trial) produces a jury verdict and triggers UD-110 items 2.e and 2.f (After Jury Trial); bench trial selected on UD-150 item 5.b (or jury waived by failure to post fees under CCP 631(f)) produces a bench judgment and triggers UD-110 items 2.a through 2.d (After Court Trial; UD-110 item 2 expressly notes the jury was waived). The right to a jury in unlawful-detainer cases is preserved by CCP 1171, and the jury fee posting deadline is enforced strictly because UD trials run on the tight 20-day calendar. The default-versus-trial radio at the top of UD-110 must match the path that produced the case; checking After Default Hearing when UD-105 was timely filed and UD-150 set a trial is a clerk-rejection trigger. UD-150 also fixes the expected trial length and any party's request for a court reporter (item 7), which feeds into the UD-110 record on appeal under CCP 1170.5(c); without a reporter or stipulated electronic record, the appellate record is limited to clerk's transcripts and any settled statement under California Rules of Court 8.137 (settled statement procedure), which usually disadvantages a tenant appellant who needs trial testimony to argue notice-defect or just-cause issues. After the verdict, UD-110 enters; if the landlord prevails, enforcement runs through EJ-130 issuance plus sheriff service under CCP 715.010 (possession portion) and CCP 699.510 (money portion), with the tenant's 5 days to vacate running from the sheriff's posted notice under CCP 715.020(b). Tenants asserting AB 1482 just-cause defenses under Civil Code section 1946.2 or specific 3-day-notice defects under CCP 1161(2) commonly take a UD case to UD-150 trial rather than default, so both sides should plan for the tight calendar; UD trials enjoy statutory priority under CCP 1170.5(a).
    EJ-130
    Writ of Execution
    Writ of Execution. UD-110 alone does not authorize the sheriff to remove the tenant; the landlord must obtain an EJ-130 writ from the clerk after UD-110 enters in order to direct the sheriff or marshal to enforce the possession portion of the judgment (Code of Civil Procedure section 712.010 makes the writ the enforcement instrument for any judgment, and CCP 715.010 applies it specifically to possession judgments). On the EJ-130 form the landlord checks 'Possession of Real Property' and copies the UD-110 judgment date, judgment amount, and case caption verbatim, plus the daily holdover damages rate that continues to accrue between UD-110 entry and the actual lockout under Civ. Code section 1951.2 and CCP 1174. Most counties issue a single EJ-130 that combines possession plus a money writ for unpaid rent, holdover damages, and costs awarded on UD-110; the money portion is enforced separately under CCP 699.510 by levy on bank accounts, wage garnishment under CCP 706.020, or asset seizure under CCP 700.010 et seq. EJ-130 issuance carries a $40 per-writ clerk fee under Government Code section 70626(a)(1) (waivable under a granted FW-001 from earlier in the case under Gov. Code 68632(c)); sheriff service of the writ on the rental address starts the 5-day notice to vacate under CCP 1174.3 (formerly 1174(c) before the 2024 renumber) and CCP 1174(a). If the tenant has not moved by day 5 the sheriff conducts the lockout, changes locks, and posts a notice of restoration of possession. The writ is valid for 180 days from issuance under CCP 683.020 and CCP 699.530; re-issuance under CCP 712.020 is available if the 180-day window lapses without a completed lockout.
    POS-030
    Proof of Service by First-Class Mail (Civil)
    Proof of Service by First-Class Mail. After UD-110 enters, the prevailing party (typically the landlord) serves a Notice of Entry of Judgment on the losing party by first-class mail under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 and uses POS-030 as the proof of that mailing; the POS-030 must be filed with the court the same day the mailing goes out so the docket reflects a clear start date for the downstream clocks. The CCP 664.5 mailing is the trigger event for every losing-party challenge to UD-110: 30 calendar days to file a notice of appeal under CCP section 904.2 and California Rules of Court rule 8.822 (appellate division of the superior court), 15 days to move for new trial under CCP 659 and 657, 6 months to move for relief under CCP 473(b) (excusable neglect) or 473.5 (extrinsic mistake), and the open-ended CCP 473(d) window for void-on-its-face attacks. Without a properly filed POS-030 documenting the CCP 664.5 service, the losing tenant can argue those clocks never started and delay sheriff lock-out under CCP 1174 indefinitely; conversely, a POS-030 placed in the file on day one nails down the start date. POS-030 also services downstream post-judgment papers in the UD file: motion to stay execution pending appeal under CCP 1176, motion to set aside default UD-110 under CCP 473.5 or 473(b), motion to quash service under CCP 418.10, application for relief from forfeiture under CCP 1179, and any opposition papers the tenant files to those motions. POS-030 does not service the EJ-130 writ itself (the levying officer serves a five-day notice to vacate under CCP 1174.3) but typically backs up service of the EJ-100 application.
    MC-025
    Attachment to Judicial Council Form
    Attachment MC-025 (Judicial Council continuation page) extends UD-110 when the unlawful detainer case has more parties or longer judgment-paragraph language than the form's inline space allows. Item 2b (parties who appeared at trial) and item 3a (party-name listing in the operative judgment paragraph) each have room for only a small number of names; cases with multiple co-tenants under CCP 1161(2)-(4), business co-defendants under CCP 1161(1), Doe amendments under CCP 474 (substituting true names for fictitious defendants), or CCP 1174.3 prejudgment claim-of-right-to-possession joinder of unknown occupants add up quickly to more than the inline boxes can hold. Header each MC-025 'Attachment [item number] to UD-110' with the case caption (Cal. Rules of Court rule 2.111(2) caption uniformity) so the clerk can pair the list with the right item; list each party in the same column shape as the base UD-110 row, using each party's full name exactly as it appears on the complaint and any 474 / 1174.3 amendments (not nicknames; CCP 425.10(a)(2) name-pleading rule controls). The UD-110 judgment under CCP 1169 binds every named defendant whether they defaulted at the CIV-100 stage or appeared at trial under CCP 1170, and the operative writ of possession under CCP 712.010 and EJ-130 enforcement under CCP 715.010 run only against parties named in the judgment; a name on the complaint that does not carry through to the UD-110 / MC-025 attachment cannot be evicted by the sheriff and instead requires a CCP 473(a)(1) amendment of the judgment (motion plus proposed amended UD-110 plus amended MC-025) before the lockout under CCP 1174 can include them, or a separate forcible-detainer action under CCP 1159-1160a against any unnamed occupant who refuses to leave. Money damages under UD-110 item 5 (past-due rent, holdover damages under CCP 1174(a), and attorney's fees if Civ. Code 1717 contract clause supports them) also run only to parties named on the judgment; uncaptured co-defendants reduce the recovery base and abstract-of-judgment liens recorded under CCP 697.310 will only encumber named-defendant property. The MC-025 must be signed under penalty of perjury per CCP 2015.5 if it contains factual findings (e.g. the FC 6224 confidential-address recital for any DV-protected co-tenant), and incorporated by reference under CRC rule 3.1110(f) into the judgment so it is part of the operative order on appeal under CCP 904.2 and on collection writ under CCP 685. The judge signs UD-110 itself; the MC-025 attachment is part of the judgment for clerk service of CCP 664.5 Notice of Entry of Judgment purposes. For tenant defendants moving under CCP 473(b) to set aside a default UD-110 within 6 months, MC-025 may carry the declaration of mistake / excusable neglect attached to the motion; same incorporation rule. Post-judgment, MC-025 also extends MC-012 Memorandum of Costs After Judgment under CCP 685.070 when the prevailing party adds writ-issuance fees, sheriff's levy fees, abstract-recording fees, and post-judgment interest under CCP 685.010 at 10 percent annual to the judgment balance.
    FW-001
    Request to Waive Court Fees
    Request to Waive Court Fees. UD-110 itself carries no separate filing fee (it is the judgment the court enters after default under CIV-100 or after trial set by UD-150, not a paper a party files), so FW-001 is not paired with UD-110 entry. The live fee question attaches at the next step: the prevailing party (typically the landlord) almost always proceeds to EJ-130 (Writ of Execution) to enforce possession through the sheriff under Code of Civil Procedure section 715.010 and money judgments under CCP 699.510, and EJ-130 issuance carries a $40 per-writ clerk fee under Government Code section 70626(a)(1), plus sheriff or marshal service fees under Gov. Code 26721 (roughly $40 to $150 per service attempt depending on county). A granted FW-001 waives both the writ clerk fee under Gov. Code 68631 and the sheriff / marshal fees under Gov. Code 68637. Eviction fee-waiver eligibility is asymmetric in practice: prevailing landlords rarely clear the 125% FPG income test on FW-001 because property income usually exceeds the threshold, but small-property owners on means-tested benefits do qualify under Gov. Code 68632(a), and the rare prevailing tenant (whose UD-105 defenses succeeded and who recovers attorney fees under a lease's prevailing-party clause or CCP 1717) qualifies. A waiver granted at the UD-100 (landlord) or UD-105 (tenant) filing stage carries forward to EJ-130 under Gov. Code 68632(c) and California Rules of Court rule 3.55, so the prevailing party normally does not refile FW-001 after UD-110 entry. UD-110 record masking under CCP 1161.2 (judgment masked from public access for 60 days, permanently if defendant prevailed or stipulated) is unrelated to FW-001.

    Field-by-field guidance

    We've mapped every field on UD-110: what it asks, what counts as a blocker, what trips most filers up. Ezel applies all of it as you fill. Plain-English questions in, court-ready PDF out.

    33 fields handled for you. You don't have to read them all.

    Start for $49 →
    Or read all 33 fields yourself
    Your Name
    blocker

    Caption must identify the attorney or self-represented party. UD-110 names the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney here because the plaintiff prepares this proposed judgment.

    • Filers list a nickname or middle initial that does not match how their name appears on the complaint. The clerk matches caption-to-caption; mismatches slow processing.
    • Plaintiffs use the property-management-company name when the lawsuit was actually filed in the individual landlord's name. Match the named plaintiff on the complaint.
    Firm Name
    none

    Firm name is for attorneys; pro se plaintiffs leave it blank.

    • Pro se filers fill this with their employer or 'self-represented'. Leave blank when not represented by a law firm.
    • Attorneys list only the lead partner's last name without 'LLP' or 'PC'. Match the firm's official registered business name.
    Bar Number
    none

    State Bar number applies only to attorneys. Self-represented plaintiffs do not have one and leave it blank.

    • Pro se filers type their CA driver's license number. Bar number is the State Bar of California license number; pro se filers leave blank.
    • Out-of-state attorneys fill in their home-state bar number. CA Rules of Court 2.111 expects the CA bar number; out-of-state counsel must associate local counsel.
    Your Street
    blocker

    Caption must include 'office address or, if none, residence address or mailing address.' Without this address the clerk cannot mail back the signed judgment.

    • Filers use the rental property's address when they live elsewhere. Use the address where the court can actually reach the filer.
    • Filers list a P.O. box only and skip the street. Per Rule 2.111 the caption needs a physical or mail address.
    Your City
    blocker

    Part of the address required by rule 2.111(1).

    • Filers spell the city differently than the USPS standard. Use the USPS-preferred spelling.
    • Filers list the county here instead of the city.
    Your State
    blocker

    Part of the address required by rule 2.111(1). Defaults to CA on this form.

    • Filers spell out 'California' when the field expects 'CA'.
    • Filers list a state different from where they receive mail. Use the actual mail-receiving state.
    Your Zip
    blocker

    Part of the address required by rule 2.111(1).

    • Filers paste ZIP+4 with the dash; the form's narrow box may truncate the +4. Use the 5-digit ZIP unless the form clearly accepts ZIP+4.
    • Filers guess at a ZIP from memory and miss by one digit. Verify against the USPS lookup.
    Your Phone
    blocker

    Rule 2.111(1) lists 'telephone number' among items the caption 'must' include.

    • Filers list a phone they no longer use. The court calls this for hearing notifications.
    • Filers list a work number where they cannot speak privately about the case. Use a personal number when possible.
    Your Email
    none

    Rule 2.111(1) literally includes 'e-mail address' in the caption requirements, but California clerks routinely accept paper UD-110 filings from self-represented landlords with the email line blank. Treated as optional in practice.

    • Filers paste an email they rarely check. If the case later moves to e-service, this becomes the address the court uses.
    • Pro se filers worry a blank email gets the form rejected. It does not for paper filings.
    Atty For
    blocker

    Identifies who the filer represents. Pro se landlords write 'Plaintiff in Pro Per' or the plaintiff's name.

    • Pro se filers leave this blank or write 'myself'. Use 'Plaintiff in Pro Per' so the court understands the role.
    • Filers in joint cases list only one party. Name all parties the filer represents.
    Court County
    blocker

    The case caption identifies the Superior Court county. Unlawful detainer venue is the county where the property is located (CCP section 1166).

    • Filers list the county they live in instead of the county where the case is venued. UD venue is set on the complaint; copy from the complaint caption.
    • Filers add 'County of' as a prefix when the form already pre-prints 'COUNTY OF'.
    Court Street
    blocker

    Court street address required on caption.

    • Filers list the courthouse name instead of the street address.
    • Filers use an old courthouse address after a relocation. Verify against the county's current Find Your Court page.
    Court Mailing
    none

    Optional; only filled when the court's mailing address differs from its street address.

    • Filers fill this when the courthouse uses the same address for mail. If court mailing equals court street, leave this blank.
    • Filers paste their own P.O. Box. This is the COURT's mailing address.
    Court City Zip
    blocker

    Court city and ZIP required on caption.

    • Filers list only the city and skip the ZIP.
    • Filers use the ZIP of an old courthouse location.
    Court Branch
    blocker

    Counties with multiple courthouses (LA, San Diego, Sacramento, Orange, Alameda) require the specific branch name to route the file correctly.

    • Filers leave this blank in counties with multiple branches (LA, San Diego, Orange, Sacramento, Alameda). Routing to the wrong branch means the file gets stuck in inter-branch transfer.
    • Filers type the courthouse's informal name instead of the official branch name. Use the formal name from the court's website.
    Case Number
    blocker

    Case number required on every page. The clerk will not be able to match UD-110 to the file without it.

    • Filers type the docket-card number with hyphens different from the official case number.
    • Filers omit the leading prefix ('22STUD' vs '22UD' for LA) thinking it is optional.
    Plaintiff Name
    blocker

    Plaintiff name on the caption must match the complaint exactly. Mismatches between UD-110 and the underlying complaint cause clerk rejection.

    • Filers shorten a business name ('Smith Properties' instead of 'Smith Properties LLC').
    • Filers list only one plaintiff when the complaint had multiple. Mirror the complaint caption.
    Defendant Name
    blocker

    Defendant name must exactly match the complaint and the CIV-100 default request. Differences (including 'aka' wording) prevent the clerk from entering judgment.

    • Filers list the defaulted defendants but skip ones who appeared and lost at trial. Both go on UD-110; the judgment binds every named defendant.
    • Filers omit DOES 1-X when the complaint included Does. Match the complaint caption.
    Judgment Path
    blocker

    Three core paths: (a) clerk's judgment for possession only after default (CCP 1169) - fastest; clerk signs without a hearing. (b) court default judgment after default (CCP 585(b) testimony, 585(d) declaration) - judge signs and can include money damages. (c) judgment after court trial (CCP 664.6 stipulated, or after evidence). Selecting the wrong path causes the clerk to reject the form. Pro se landlords filing only for possession should pick the clerk path.

    • Pro se landlords pick item 1a (clerk's judgment for possession only) when they want money damages too. Item 1a is possession ONLY; for money, the path is 1c (court judgment after default with 585(b) prove-up) or 2 (after trial).
    • Filers check item 2 (after trial) when no trial actually happened. Match the path to what actually occurred in the case.
    Default Basis
    blocker

    Item 1a-c describes the predicate facts: defendant was served with the summons and complaint, failed to answer in time, and the clerk entered default on plaintiff's CIV-100 application. All three are necessary for any default-path judgment. If even one is false (e.g., default was never entered on CIV-100), the clerk will reject UD-110.

    • Filers check the default path when the defendant actually answered. Use a trial path (item 2 or 2a) instead.
    • Filers leave default basis blank when the path is item 1a or 1c. The clerk needs to see the predicate facts.
    Trial Date
    warning

    Date of trial. Required only if the user picked an after-trial path; required to be blank for default cases (filling it on a default form will confuse the clerk).

    • Filers list the date of a hearing that was not the actual trial. Use the date the trial concluded; if testimony spanned multiple days, the last day.
    • Filers fill this on the default path. Trial date applies only to items 2 and 2a; blank for default paths.
    Trial Judge
    warning

    Name of the judicial officer who presided at trial. Required only on the trial path; blank for default cases.

    • Filers list the judge who presided at a status conference rather than the trial judge. Use the name from the trial minute order.
    • Filers misspell the judge's name. Verify against the court's website roster.
    Premises Address
    blocker

    Item 4 is the address of the premises being recovered. The sheriff or marshal uses this exact address to enforce the writ of possession. Pro se landlords frequently leave off the apartment number, which causes the sheriff's office to return the writ for correction.

    • Missing apartment or unit number
    • Address differs (even by abbreviation) from the complaint
    Occupants Check
    info

    When checked, the judgment binds all occupants including unnamed tenants, subtenants, and named claimants, allowing the sheriff to evict everyone in the unit. To get this benefit, the plaintiff must have served a Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession (CP10.5) with the original summons. If a CP10.5 was not served, an unnamed occupant can later file a Claim of Right to Possession and delay the lockout.

    • Landlords check this without having served Form CP10.5 (Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession). Without CP10.5 service, an unnamed occupant can challenge the eviction even after judgment; the box should not be checked.
    • Landlords leave this blank when CP10.5 was served. Check the box so the judgment binds unnamed occupants too.
    Request Money
    none

    If the plaintiff wants money damages (past-due rent, holdover damages, fees, costs), they must check the court-judgment path AND complete UD-116 (Declaration for Default Judgment by Court). The clerk cannot enter a money judgment under CCP 1169; only the judge can.

    • Landlords check the money-judgment box but skip filing a Memorandum of Costs (MC-010) and a Statement of Damages. Both are typically required for the clerk or judge to enter the money portion.
    • Landlords request more money than the complaint demanded. The judgment cannot exceed the complaint's demand on a default; cap at the complaint amount.
    Past Due Rent
    warning

    Past-due rent demanded in the complaint. The plaintiff cannot recover more rent than what was pleaded; the court will not award rent that accrued after filing. UD-116 must support the figure.

    • Filers add post-complaint rent here. Past-due rent is what was demanded in the complaint; rent accrued after the complaint was filed goes under holdover_damages.
    • Filers list the lease's monthly rent times the months in arrears without checking that this matches the demand on the complaint. The judgment cannot exceed the complaint's pleaded amount.
    Holdover Damages
    info

    Daily damages for the holdover period. Calculated as (daily rental value) x (days from notice expiration through judgment date).

    • Filers compute holdover at the lease rate when the complaint pleaded fair rental value. Use whichever the complaint pleaded; if the complaint was silent, use the lease rate per CCP 1174(b).
    • Filers calculate holdover from the date of the demand letter rather than the date the complaint was filed. Holdover damages run from notice expiration through judgment.
    Attorney Fees
    none

    Available only if the lease has an attorney-fees clause and the plaintiff actually paid an attorney. Pro se landlords usually leave this blank.

    • Pro se landlords claim attorney fees they never paid. Fees are recoverable only if actually incurred and the lease has an attorney-fees clause; pro se filers without counsel get $0 here.
    • Landlords request fees without filing a Memorandum of Costs (MC-010) itemizing the fees. MC-010 is required for the clerk to award the line.
    Costs
    info

    Filing fees and process server fees, matching the Memorandum of Costs filed with CIV-100 item 7.

    • Filers double-count costs that already appear on a previously-filed Memorandum of Costs. Check the MC-010 already on file; do not duplicate.
    • Filers include investigator fees or other litigation expenses not in CCP 1033.5's recoverable list. Stick to filing fee, process-server fee, and other 1033.5 items.
    Other Amount
    none

    Catch-all for amounts not fitting the other lines. Rare; usually blank.

    • Filers add prejudgment interest here. Prejudgment interest in UD requires a separate calculation under Civ. Code 3287; usually skip on default judgments unless specifically pleaded.
    • Filers use this for late fees not pleaded in the complaint. Late fees must be pleaded; otherwise they cannot be added at judgment.
    Total Judgment
    warning

    Sum of items 6a(1)-(5). Arithmetic errors are a top reason clerks reject UD-110 in the money-judgment path.

    • Filers' arithmetic does not match the sum of the line items. The clerk recalculates and rejects on mismatch; double-check against a calculator.
    • Filers exclude costs from the total. Total is the sum of all 6a(1)-(5) lines including costs.
    Rental Agreement Canceled
    warning

    Cancellation/forfeiture of the lease ends the tenant's right to return. Almost always checked because that is the whole point of an eviction judgment.

    • Landlords leave this blank thinking the eviction itself ends the lease. The form's checkbox is what formally cancels the lease and forecloses the tenant's right to return; check the box.
    • Tenants in tenant-friendly settlements check this without realizing it ends any reinstatement option. Discuss with counsel before checking; the box is irrevocable once entered.
    Verification Date
    blocker

    Date the plaintiff submits the proposed judgment. The judge or clerk also dates and signs when entering the judgment; that is a separate signature line filled in by the court, not by the user.

    • Filers post-date the signature thinking the form will be signed by the judge later. Use today's date; the judge dates separately when signing.
    • Filers leave the date blank because the judge will date it. The plaintiff or attorney's submission date is separate from the judicial signature date; both must appear on the form.

    Ezel is a self-help tool. Ezel is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. You are the filer. Review the form carefully before submitting it to the court, and consult a licensed attorney if you have questions about your case. For free legal help, contact your local legal aid office or court self-help center.

    Sources

    Ready to file UD-110?

    You've seen what's involved. Fill UD-110 with Ezel in minutes, not hours.

    One-time, 30-day workspace.