← Browse all forms UD-150

Request/Counter-Request to Set Case for Trial, Unlawful Detainer

Fill it with Ezel. AI intake, blocker review, court-ready PDF.

California · Trial within 20 days after the first UD-150 is filed.

File UD-150 with Ezel

Fill UD-150 with Ezel

$49 one-time, 30-day workspace

AI-assisted intake, completeness review, and a court-ready PDF for UD-150 only. Print, sign in pen, file yourself.

Secure payment via Stripe. By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

What Ezel does with UD-150

Tell Ezel what's going on. The rest is automatic.

Court Filing
Ezel is reading your story…
What Ezel did:
    You describe, Ezel fills. Need help on any field while you fill your form? Tap the question mark and ask. Start filing

    What is UD-150?

    Asks the court to set a trial date in a California unlawful detainer (eviction) case after the tenant has filed an Answer (UD-105). Either party may file it; the second party may file a Counter-Request, often to switch from a nonjury to a jury trial.

    What happens if you miss the deadline: Failing to file a Counter-Request demanding a jury trial within a reasonable time after the other side's UD-150 can be treated as waiver of the jury (CCP section 631).

    How to file

    Filing fee
    There is no separate filing fee for UD-150 itself; it is a procedural request within the existing case. If a jury is demanded, $150 must be deposited with the court at least 5 court days before trial (CCP section 631). Court reporter and interpreter fees vary by county. Filers who cannot pay can apply for a fee waiver on FW-001.
    Filing method
    in-person, mail, efile (county-specific)
    Filing deadline
    There is no statutory deadline to FILE UD-150, but trial must be held no later than 20 days after the first request is made (CCP section 1170.5(a)). Practical timing: a plaintiff usually files UD-150 immediately after the tenant's UD-105 answer is on file. A tenant who wants a jury trial should file a Counter-Request within roughly 10 days of receiving the landlord's UD-150; waiting too long can be treated as waiver of the jury (CCP section 631).
    How to serve
    Service by mail on every other party (or their counsel of record) is required, documented on the form's page 2 'Proof of Service by Mail.' The mailer must be 18 or older AND not a party to the case. Both the UD-150 and the completed proof of service are filed together.
    Wet signature
    Yes, sign in pen after printing.
    Notarization
    No
    Original and copies
    One original to the clerk plus one copy per party served (and one for the filer's records). Mail copies first, file the original with the proof of service.

    Common pitfalls

    Two highest-leverage checks for the AI review on UD-150. (1) Mutual-exclusivity: items 1a vs 1b (possession status), item 3 jury vs nonjury, item 4 days vs hours, the Request vs Counter-Request box, and the Plaintiff vs Defendant filer box are each binary; checking both or neither is a clerk-rejection blocker. (2) Server eligibility: a self-represented filer cannot personally mail the form; the proof of service must be signed by an over-18 non-party. Reviewers should check that the server's name on the proof of service is NOT the same as the filer's name.

    Don't memorize the rules. Ezel walks you through UD-150 field by field, flags what the AI review treats as a blocker, and renders a court-ready PDF.

    Start filing →

    You'll likely also file

    Other Ezel-supported forms that commonly file alongside UD-150. Each one has its own guided fill, AI review, and PDF render.

    UD-105
    Answer to Unlawful Detainer
    Answer (Unlawful Detainer) UD-105. UD-150 is filed ONLY after the unlawful detainer case is at issue, meaning the defendant has filed an answer (UD-105 or its narrative-pleading equivalent under California Rules of Court rule 3.1320 / 3.1322, including general denial under CCP 431.40, demurrer under CCP 430.10, motion to quash under CCP 418.10, or motion to strike under CCP 435) within 5 court days of personal service of the summons under Code Civ. Proc. section 1167 (5 days for personal service; 15 court days for substituted service under CCP 415.20 plus mailing; longer windows for service by publication under CCP 415.50 with court order or AB 2347 / Safe at Home protected-address pathways). Without an answer (or alternative responsive pleading) on file, the plaintiff's path forward is CIV-100 Request for Entry of Default and UD-110 (clerk's possession-only judgment under CCP section 1169 if money damages are not sought, or court default judgment under CCP 585(b) with prove-up if damages are sought), NOT UD-150. UD-150 sets the case for trial under CCP 1170.5(a), which requires trial within 20 COURT DAYS (not calendar days) of the demand unless the parties stipulate to a continuance under CCP 1170.5(b) or the court finds good cause; the demand on UD-150 controls the trial-setting clock, and MISSING IT is the most common reason eviction defendants discover the trial date too late to prepare a habitability defense under Civ Code 1941.1, retaliatory eviction defense under Civ Code 1942.5, just-cause defense under AB-1482, or rent-control defense under local ordinances. Either party can file UD-150 (Request) or Counter-Request, but ONLY after at least one UD-105 (or equivalent answer / alternative responsive pleading) is in the case file; filing UD-150 with no answer on file gets rejected at the counter and may expose the filer to CCP 128.7(c) sanctions for paper unsupported by the record. UD-150 itself is filed within 15 days after answer per CCP 1170.5(a), and the trial-setting 5-day jury fee deposit under CCP 631(c) is due BEFORE the trial date set on UD-150.
    UD-110
    Judgment, Unlawful Detainer
    Judgment, Unlawful Detainer. Successor on the contested-trial path: after the trial that UD-150 sets under Code of Civil Procedure section 1170.5(a) (20-day mandatory trial date measured from the UD-150 demand date), the prevailing party (usually the landlord; occasionally the tenant if affirmative defenses under Civil Code 1942.4 habitability or Civ. Code 1942.5 retaliation or AB 1482 just-cause under Civ. Code 1946.2 succeeded, or if the 3-day pay-or-quit notice was technically defective under CCP 1161(2) per Levitz v. Roberts 28 Cal.App.4th 1404 (1994) overstated-rent rule) files UD-110 as the judgment using items 2.a through 2.d (After Court Trial; UD-110 item 2 expressly notes the jury was waived) or items 2.e/2.f (After Jury Trial) if either party preserved the right under CCP 1171 (general civil jury right preserved in UD context, with jury fee deposit per CCP 631(b)(1) due 25 calendar days before first scheduled trial date or jury waived under CCP 631(f)(4)-(5)) and paid the jury fee. Code of Civil Procedure section 1170.5(a) requires the trial to be held no later than 20 days after the demand is made on UD-150; continuances tightly constrained under CCP 1170.5(b) good-cause findings (impossibility, prejudice, or unforeseen need), with CCP 1170.5(c) imposing a mandatory $1,000 per day continuance fee against the party whose conduct caused the delay (Strait v. Sutter Memorial Hospital 161 Cal.App.4th 187 (2008) (CCP 1170.5(c) fee mandatory)). UD-110 enters once the bench or jury verdict comes down. The judgment uses items 5 through 10 to award (item 5) possession (the underlying point of the unlawful detainer under CCP 1161(2)), (item 6) past-due rent (prove-up at trial under CCP 1161(2)/(3) statutory rent calculation; landlord must prove rent owed by date, lease provisions per Cobb v. Pasadena City Bd. of Education 134 Cal.App.2d 93 (1955)), (item 7) holdover damages from the day the notice expired through judgment entry at the rental's reasonable daily value (item 8 calculation per CCP 1174(b) and Civ. Code 3287 prejudgment-interest calculation; daily holdover damages calculated as monthly rent / 30 days under Hyatt v. Tedesco 96 Cal.App.4th Supp. 62 (2002)), (item 9) statutory or contractual attorney fees where the lease has an attorney-fee clause and the prevailing-party rule under Civil Code section 1717 applies (Hsu v. Abbara 9 Cal.4th 863 (1995); Santisas v. Goodin 17 Cal.4th 599 (1998); UD-specific attorney-fee cap under CCP 1174(g) limits fees if the lease fee clause caps them at a dollar amount), and (item 10) costs of suit under CCP 1032(b) cross to CCP 1033.5(a) recoverable categories (filing fees, service, transcripts, deposition costs; not attorney travel time or trial-prep time except under CCP 1033.5(b) discretion). The default-versus-trial path radio at the top of UD-110 must match the path that produced the case; checking the After Court Trial box when no trial was actually held is grounds for the clerk to refuse entry under California Rules of Court rule 5.405(b) (clerk-level prove-up verification). After UD-110 entry the prevailing party files EJ-130 (Writ of Execution / Writ of Possession of Real Property) to enforce possession through the sheriff under CCP 715.010 (writ for restoration of possession of real property issued by the clerk under CCP 712.010 with the sheriff's lockout posting under CCP 715.020(a) and 5-business-day notice to vacate under CCP 715.020(b); the 5-day count runs from sheriff service of the writ on the tenant, NOT from clerk issuance); a separate writ for any money judgment is sought under CCP 699.510 (writ for money authorized as part of the same EJ-130 or as separate EJ-130 form). UD-specific record-sealing under CCP 1161.2(a)(1) automatically masks the case from public access for 60 days post-judgment if the tenant prevailed or stipulated, with permanent masking under SB 1078 (2022) amendments for tenants in 'no-fault just-cause' or fully-performed stipulated judgments. The CCP 1167.5 60-day appellate-bond requirement applies if the tenant appeals (tenant must post a bond equal to 6-12 months' rent on appeal to stay enforcement; landlord may move to vacate the stay if bond is inadequate).
    MC-025
    Attachment to Judicial Council Form
    Attachment MC-025 (Judicial Council continuation page) extends UD-150's page 2 proof-of-service recipients table when more than three parties (or their counsel of record) must be served by mail under Code Civ. Proc. section 1013(a). The page 2 table holds three named recipients with full mailing addresses; UD-150's own field-level note directs filers to MC-025 for four-plus recipients (common in multi-tenant unlawful detainer cases under CCP 1166(a)(5) and multi-defendant non-payment UD complaints where each named tenant gets their own copy). Header the MC-025 'Attachment to UD-150 Proof of Service' with the case caption verbatim, list each additional recipient's name and mailing address in the same columns as page 2 rows 1 to 3 (recipient name on the left, address on the right), and have the over-18 non-party server sign and date the attachment to mirror the page 2 signature under CCP section 1013a (the server's declaration under penalty of perjury must cover ALL recipients on the page 2 table AND the MC-025 attachment together). Both UD-150 and the completed proof of service (page 2 plus any MC-025 continuation) file together with the clerk; padding the recipients table with non-parties is a clerk-rejection trigger under CCP 128.7(c), so only list actual served parties. MC-025 is ALSO used for UD-150 item 7 (estimated trial time) when the case has multiple issues requiring extended testimony (habitability defenses, retaliatory eviction defenses, rent-control challenges, tenant-protection-act exemption claims) and the explanation does not fit on the face form; in that role the MC-025 attaches as 'Attachment to UD-150 Item 7' and the trial-time estimate flows to the CCP 1170.5(a) 20-court-day trial-clock calendar. Continuation pages do NOT extend the 20-day fast-trial clock under CCP 1170.5(a); the clock runs on the UD-150 service date regardless of attachment count.
    FW-001
    Request to Waive Court Fees
    Request to Waive Court Fees. UD-150 itself has no filing fee (it is a clerk-set notice of trial demand on an already-paid unlawful-detainer case where the underlying filing fee was paid by the landlord at the UD-100 filing under Gov. Code section 70613 (limited civil $370 for amount-in-controversy under $10,000) or 70611 (unlimited civil $435 for over $10,000)), but a party who demands a jury on UD-150 item 5.a must deposit the first installment of $150 with the court at least 25 calendar days before the first day of trial under Code of Civil Procedure section 631(b)(1) and the second installment of $150 at least 25 calendar days before trial under CCP 631(b)(2) (with both installments due 5 days before trial in some county practice; failure to deposit by the deadline results in automatic waiver of the jury under CCP 631(f)(4)-(5), and the trial proceeds bench (Trans-Action Commercial Investors, Ltd. v. Firmaterr, Inc. 60 Cal.App.4th 352 (1997); Tesoro Del Valle Master Homeowners Assn. v. Griffin 200 Cal.App.4th 619 (2011) (fee waiver carries forward to jury fees)). CCP 631.3 then requires a continuing daily court-reporter fee deposit (currently $30 per half-day under Gov. Code 68086(a)) for any party requesting a reporter; both jury fees and court-reporter fees are covered by an FW-001 grant under Gov. Code section 68632 and 68632(d) (waiver includes jury fees under Gov. Code 68631 application to 'court fees' broadly defined). FW-001 waives the $150 jury deposits, the daily $30 reporter fees, and any other UD-150-related court costs for indigent jury demanders on three independent statutory bases: (a) Gov. Code 68632(a) (means-tested benefit: Medicaid / Medi-Cal, SSI, CalFresh / SNAP, CalWORKs / TANF, public housing, county relief, IHSS, food distribution programs); (b) Gov. Code 68632(b) (income at or below 125 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines); or (c) Gov. Code 68632(c) (financial hardship documented by FW-001 item 7 monthly income / expense breakdown, with the standard expressed as inability to pay for the 'necessities of life'). A fee waiver already granted at the UD-105 answer stage typically carries forward under Gov. Code 68632(c) cross to California Rules of Court rule 3.55(b)-(c) to the UD-150 jury deposit (the same case, the same party, the same financial circumstances) (In re Marriage of Crowell 200 Cal.App.4th 1432 (2011) (continuing waiver in same case unless revoked under Gov. Code 68636)); the moving party should still file FW-001 explicitly with the UD-150 if no prior grant is on file or if the financial situation has improved since the prior grant, because the court will not assume waiver coverage of a jury deposit without an updated FW-003 grant order. A bench-trial request on UD-150 (item 5.b or default) needs no FW-001 because no deposit is owed; court reporters in unlawful-detainer cases under CRC 2.956 and Gov. Code 68086 are handled separately by Gov. Code 68086(b)-(c) (court reporter may be requested 10 days before trial; reporter fees waived under FW-001 grant). Note that UD-150 service via POS-030 incurs no separate fee since the server is unpaid (a non-party adult under CCP 1013(a)) or charges a private fee (which is the moving party's expense not subject to FW-001 since it is a third-party service-of-process cost not a court fee); FW-001 covers court fees only, not private process-server fees (Gov. Code 68631(b) intro defines covered fees as 'fees and costs payable to the court'). The clerk rules on the FW-001 within 5 court days of filing under Gov. Code 68634(a); if denied, the moving party has 10 days to pay the jury fees or the jury demand is waived under CCP 631(f)(4) and Gov. Code 68634(d). Default judgment cases that bypass UD-150 entirely (UD-100 served, no UD-105 filed within 5 court days, CIV-100 filed) skip the trial-fee question altogether.
    POS-030
    Proof of Service by First-Class Mail (Civil)
    Proof of Service by First-Class Mail. UD-150 must be served on the opposing party so the 20-day fast-trial setting clock under CCP 1170.5(a) can run from a documented service date; without proof of service in the file, the clerk will not calendar a UD-150 trial date. After both sides have appeared in the unlawful detainer case (the landlord by filing UD-100 + summons, the tenant by filing UD-105 within the 5-day window under CCP 1167), between-parties service of UD-150 by first-class mail is permitted under CCP 1013(a); first-class mail is the standard mechanism because the parties have already submitted to court jurisdiction and personal service is no longer required. POS-030 documents the mailing with the server's name, mailing address, and date placed in the mail. The server must be 18 or older and not a party (CCP 1013(a)), so the moving party (tenant or landlord) cannot mail-serve their own UD-150; a roommate, family member, or process server signs POS-030. Mail service under CCP 1013(a) adds 5 calendar days to any deadline the served paper triggers, but UD-150's 20-day trial-setting window under CCP 1170.5(a) runs from the demand date itself, not from any responsive deadline, so the +5 mail rule does not delay the trial. CCP 1170.8 also gives the served party 5 days to file a counter-request on the same UD-150 if they want different trial preferences (jury vs bench, court reporter, time estimate); the served party computes that 5 days from the mailing date plus the CCP 1013(a) +5 days. File the signed POS-030 with the court alongside the UD-150 within a few days of service so the file is complete when the clerk sets the trial date.
    CIV-100
    Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter Default)
    Request for Entry of Default (anti-recommendation). The alternative landlord move at the post-answer fork. UD-150 Request/Counter-Request to Set Case for Trial is filed because a UD-105 answer (or equivalent appearance: motion to quash under CCP 418.10, demurrer, motion to strike under CCP 435, motion for summary judgment) is on file; if no answer was filed within the Code Civ. Proc. section 1167 window (5 court days after personal service of summons; 15 court days after service by mail with notice and acknowledgement under CCP 415.30; 10-15 court days after substituted service under CCP 415.20 plus mailing; or the Safe at Home / publication windows under CCP 415.50 and AB 2347 reforms), the landlord requests default via CIV-100 instead and skips trial entirely. Default is entered by the clerk on CIV-100 face under CCP 585(a); the landlord then proceeds to default JUDGMENT on UD-110 (Judgment, Unlawful Detainer) by clerk's office (if money rent only) or court hearing prove-up (if any non-monetary relief). Before filing UD-150, confirm the answer is in the court file by checking the docket or calling the clerk; before filing CIV-100, confirm no UD-105 or alternative responsive pleading (motion to quash, demurrer) was filed under California Rules of Court 3.1320 / 3.1322 (the 'or' word matters: any responsive pleading kills default). The two forms are mutually exclusive on the same complaint: filing UD-150 when default is available wastes the CCP 1170.5(a) 20-day fast-trial clock and signals to the court the landlord misread the docket; filing CIV-100 when an answer is on file gets rejected at the counter under CCP 585.5 and may draw an FC 271-style sanctions response in a related civil-harassment matter. After CIV-100 entry the tenant's only set-aside route is CCP 473(b) (mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect within 6 months) or CCP 473.5 (lack of actual notice within 2 years), so the wizard should warn the landlord that filing CIV-100 prematurely (while a UD-105 was actually filed but not yet docketed) creates an avoidable set-aside risk.

    Field-by-field guidance

    We've mapped every field on UD-150: what it asks, what counts as a blocker, what trips most filers up. Ezel applies all of it as you fill. Plain-English questions in, court-ready PDF out.

    38 fields handled for you. You don't have to read them all.

    Start for $49 →
    Or read all 38 fields yourself
    Party Block
    blocker

    Caption must identify the attorney or self-represented party, with name, address, telephone, and (for attorneys) State Bar number.

    • Filers leave the caption block blank because they are pro se. The block is required for self-represented filers too; identifies who the court reaches with orders.
    • Filers list a friend's address because they're 'staying there'. Use the address where the court can actually reach the filer; an unstable address means missed hearing notices.
    Your Phone
    blocker

    Caption telephone number is mandatory.

    • Filers list a phone they no longer use. The court calls this number for hearing notifications; pick a reachable number.
    • Filers list a work number where they cannot speak privately about the case. Use a personal number when possible.
    Your Fax
    none

    Fax is listed in rule 2.111(1) but is essentially never required for self-represented filers in practice.

    • Filers leave fax blank and worry the form will be rejected. It will not; pro se filers without a fax line correctly leave this field empty.
    • Filers paste their phone number here. Fax and phone are different fields; if there is no fax, leave blank.
    Your Email
    none

    Email is listed in rule 2.111(1) but California courts routinely accept paper UD-150 from pro se filers with the email blank.

    • Filers paste an email they rarely check. If the case later moves to e-service, this becomes the address the court uses; pick one the filer actually monitors.
    • Pro se filers worry a blank email gets the form rejected. It does not for paper UD filings; clerks accept blanks for self-represented filers.
    Atty For
    blocker

    Identifies who the filer represents.

    • Pro se filers leave this blank or write 'myself'. Use 'Plaintiff in Pro Per' (landlord side) or 'Defendant in Pro Per' (tenant side); the court needs the role.
    • Tenants write 'Tenant' instead of 'Defendant'. Use the case-caption role; 'Tenant' is the substantive label, 'Defendant' is the procedural one the form expects.
    Court County
    blocker

    Court county required on caption.

    • Filers list the county they live in instead of the county where the case is venued. UD venue is set on the complaint; copy from the complaint caption.
    • Filers add 'County of' as a prefix when the form already pre-prints 'COUNTY OF'. Type only the county name.
    Court Street
    blocker

    Court street address required on caption.

    • Filers list the courthouse name instead of its street address. Use the street address.
    • Filers use an old courthouse address after a relocation. Verify against the county's current Find Your Court page.
    Court Mailing
    none

    Optional; only filled when the court's mailing address differs.

    • Filers fill this when the courthouse uses the same address for mail. If court mailing equals court street, leave this blank.
    • Filers paste the filer's own P.O. Box. This is the court's mailing address.
    Court City Zip
    blocker

    Court city and ZIP required on caption.

    • Filers list only the city and skip the ZIP. The caption needs both for routing in counties with multiple courthouses.
    • Filers use the ZIP of an old courthouse location. Verify against the court's current website.
    Court Branch
    blocker

    Required for routing in counties with multiple courthouses.

    • Filers leave this blank in counties with multiple branches (LA, San Diego, Orange, Sacramento). Routing to the wrong branch means the file gets stuck in inter-branch transfer.
    • Filers type the courthouse's informal name instead of the official branch name. Use the formal name from the court's website.
    Case Number
    blocker

    Case number required on every page.

    • Filers type the docket-card number with hyphens different from the official case number. Match the case number on the complaint's file-stamp exactly.
    • Filers omit the leading prefix ('22STUD' vs '22UD' for LA) thinking it is optional. The full case number with prefix is what clerks search.
    Plaintiff Name
    blocker

    Plaintiff name required on caption; must match the original complaint.

    • Filers shorten a business name ('Smith Properties' instead of 'Smith Properties LLC'). The caption must match the complaint exactly.
    • Filers list only one plaintiff when the complaint had multiple. Use the same caption block as the complaint, including 'et al.' if used.
    Defendant Name
    blocker

    Defendant name required on caption; must match the original complaint.

    • Filers list only the named defendants and skip 'DOES 1-X' if the complaint included Doe defendants. Match the complaint caption.
    • Tenant filers list only their own name, omitting co-tenants who were also sued. Mirror the complaint caption regardless of which side the filer is on.
    Request Type
    blocker

    Form is bidirectional. The filer must indicate whether they are filing FIRST (Request) or RESPONDING to the other side's UD-150 (Counter-Request). Failing to check exactly one box is a clerk-rejection blocker.

    • Tenants check 'Request' instead of 'Counter-Request' when responding to a landlord's UD-150. The first-filed UD-150 is the Request; the second is the Counter-Request.
    • Filers check both boxes thinking it covers either case. The form needs exactly one box; the clerk rejects forms with both.
    Filer Party
    blocker

    Filer must indicate whether they are the plaintiff (landlord) or defendant (tenant). Mismatch with the actual case caption is a clerk-rejection blocker.

    • Tenants writing 'Plaintiff' because they are the moving party of this motion. UD-150 uses the case-caption roles, not the motion roles; tenants are 'Defendant' even when initiating the request.
    • Filers leave both boxes blank thinking the caption already says it. The form needs the box checked; an unchecked filer-party box is a clerk-rejection blocker.
    Represented Served
    blocker

    Filer represents to the court that all parties have been served and have appeared (or been defaulted/dismissed). A trial cannot go forward with unserved defendants. Plaintiffs filing this who have an unserved defendant should first dismiss that defendant or complete service.

    • Plaintiffs file UD-150 while a co-defendant remains unserved. Trial cannot proceed against unserved parties; either dismiss the unserved defendant or complete service first.
    • Filers check this box without realizing it is a representation under penalty of perjury. If service is incomplete, do not check; correct the case first.
    Possession Status
    blocker

    Item 1a (still in issue) triggers legal preference under CCP 1179a, which gives unlawful detainer cases priority on the trial calendar (the 20-day clock is enforced against the court). Item 1b (no longer in issue) signals the tenant has vacated and only money damages remain, dropping the case to a normal civil track. Exactly one box must be checked.

    • Tenant has vacated mid-case but landlord still checks 'still in issue' (1a). Use 1b once the tenant moves out; the case drops off the legal-preference fast track.
    • Filers check both 1a and 1b thinking it covers either possibility. The form needs exactly one; check 1a if possession is still contested, 1b if not.
    Premises Address
    blocker

    Full premises address required so the court can confirm legal preference applies (item 1a). Should match the address on the original complaint.

    • Filers shorten the premises address ('123 Main' instead of '123 Main Street, Apt 4B'). Use the full address from the complaint, including unit number; this is what the court uses to confirm legal preference applies.
    • Filers list a different address than the complaint (e.g., the landlord's mailing address). The premises address is the rental property, not the parties' addresses.
    Trial Type
    blocker

    Mutual-exclusive choice between jury and nonjury. Jury demands carry a $150 deposit (CCP section 631) due at least 5 court days before trial. A party who fails to deposit the fee is treated as having waived the jury. Either party can demand a jury; the demand on UD-150 is the standard procedural moment to do so. Tenants frequently demand a jury via Counter-Request.

    • Tenants demand a jury without budgeting for the $150 deposit. The deposit is due at least 5 court days before trial under CCP 631; fail and the jury is waived.
    • Filers check both 'jury' and 'nonjury' thinking it covers either. The form needs exactly one; check the actual demand.
    Trial Length Unit
    blocker

    Mutual-exclusive choice between days and hours. Most pro se UD trials are estimated in hours (1-3 hours typical).

    • Filers check 'days' for a typical 2-3 hour pro se UD trial. Most UD trials take hours, not days; use 'hours' unless multiple-day witnesses are scheduled.
    • Filers check both boxes hoping the court picks. Pick one; the form needs a single answer.
    Trial Length Days
    warning

    Numeric estimate of trial days. Required if 'days' is selected; blank if 'hours' is selected.

    • Filers fill this when 'hours' was selected. Leave blank when the trial is estimated in hours.
    • Filers overestimate to hedge ('5 days' for a simple eviction). Most pro se UDs take 0.5-1 day max if 'days' applies; over-estimating delays calendar slot assignment.
    Trial Length Hours
    warning

    Numeric estimate of trial hours. Required if 'hours' is selected; blank if 'days' is selected.

    • Filers underestimate to '1 hour' when there are multiple witnesses. The court calendars the slot; under-estimating means the trial gets cut off mid-witness and continued to a new date.
    • Filers fill this when 'days' was selected. Leave blank when the trial is estimated in days.
    Unavailable Dates
    none

    Optional. The court will avoid the listed dates within the 20-day window when feasible. Specific dates with reasons are more likely to be honored than general 'unavailable in March.'

    • Filers list general blocks ('all of March'). Specific dates with reasons are far more likely to be honored than general unavailability.
    • Filers list dates outside the 20-day legal preference window. The court must set trial within 20 days; unavailable dates only matter within that window.
    Uda Used
    blocker

    Form text states 'Complete in all cases.' Software is not a UDA; only paid non-attorney humans count. Truthful answer for self-help users using only software is 'did not.' Failing to check either box is a clerk-rejection blocker.

    • Filers worry that using legal-tech software (Ezel, LegalZoom) makes them a UDA user. Software is not a UDA; the truthful answer for self-help users is 'did not.'
    • Filers who DID use a paid UDA leave this blank to avoid disclosure. The disclosure is mandatory; non-disclosure is grounds for sanctions.
    Verification Date
    blocker

    Date the filer signs under penalty of perjury. Without a date the verification is invalid.

    • Filers post-date the signature thinking the form will be filed later. Use today's date; if filing is delayed, re-sign and re-date.
    • Filers sign before completing the form. The verification certifies that everything above is true; sign last.
    Verification Name
    blocker

    Printed name of filer. Required for the clerk to identify the party who signed.

    • Filers print a nickname under the signature. Print the legal name as it appears in the caption.
    • Filers leave the printed name blank because the cursive signature is 'enough'. Print legibly so docket entries use the right spelling.
    Server Address
    blocker

    Server's residence or business address, used to establish that the server is a person located within the county where mailing took place. Server must be over 18 AND not a party.

    • Server lists a P.O. Box without a street. POS section needs a residence or business address per CCP 1013(a); a P.O. Box alone is not enough.
    • Server uses the same address as the filer when they are roommates. The address must be the server's, not the filer's.
    Mailing Method
    blocker

    Mutual-exclusive: USPS deposit (the typical pro se choice) or business-practice collection (only for organizations with a regular mail-collection process).

    • Filers check 'business practice' (item 3b) when they personally dropped the envelope at a mailbox. 'Business practice' is for organizations with regular mail-collection processes; pro se filers use USPS deposit (item 3a).
    • Filers leave both boxes blank because the proof of service feels procedural. The clerk rejects the form when item 3 is unchecked.
    Mailing Date
    blocker

    Date the envelope was deposited with USPS. Service is complete on this date under CCP section 1013(a).

    • Server post-dates because the form will be filed later. Use the actual deposit date; the date determines when service is complete under CCP 1013(a).
    • Server lists the date the form was signed instead of the date mailed. Sign and mail the same day to keep dates consistent.
    Mailing Place
    blocker

    City and state where the envelope was deposited.

    • Server lists only the city. The form expects city AND state; '[City], CA' is the standard format.
    • Server lists where the mail was addressed instead of where it was deposited. The form asks where the envelope was mailed FROM.
    Server Signature Date
    blocker

    Date the server signs the proof of service. Usually the same as the mailing date.

    • Server signs days after mailing. Best practice: sign and mail the same day; mismatch between signature and mailing date can be challenged.
    • Server signs but leaves the date blank thinking the signature alone is enough. The date is required for a valid POS.
    Server Name
    blocker

    Server's printed name. Critical: must NOT be the same as the filer (the form's instructions explicitly say the filer cannot mail their own papers).

    • Filer signs as the server. The server CANNOT be a party to the case; the form's instructions say so explicitly. Have a friend, roommate, or family member over 18 do the mailing.
    • Server is under 18. Server must be 18+; check the age before delegating.
    Recipient 1 Name
    blocker

    Name of the first recipient served. If the opposing party has counsel of record, mail to counsel (not the party directly). Pro se opposing parties get served at their home or mailing address.

    • Filer mails to the opposing party directly when the opposing party has an attorney of record. Per CCP 1015, mail goes to counsel, not party, once counsel appears.
    • Filer types only the law firm name without identifying the lead attorney. Name the attorney first ('John Smith, Esq., Smith & Co.').
    Recipient 1 Address
    blocker

    Address used on the envelope. Must match an actual mailable address.

    • Filer uses the premises address as the tenant's mailing address. The tenant may have moved; use the address on the most recent appearance or pleading.
    • Filer omits the unit number. P.O. Boxes and apartment numbers are required for actual delivery.
    Recipient 2 Name
    none

    Optional second recipient (e.g., co-counsel for the opposing party).

    • Filer fills only one recipient when there are multiple opposing parties or co-counsel. List every party who needs service; one envelope per recipient.
    • Filer adds a recipient who is not actually a party (e.g., a witness or interested non-party). List only parties or their counsel.
    Recipient 2 Address
    none

    Optional second recipient address.

    • Filer fills the address but leaves recipient_2_name blank. Both fields go together; an orphan address is not a valid POS entry.
    • Filer reuses recipient_1_address for a different recipient. List each recipient's actual address.
    Recipient 3 Name
    none

    Optional third recipient.

    • Filer puts a third recipient when only two parties exist. List only actual recipients; padding the table can be challenged as a misrepresentation.
    • Overflow runs past three rows but filer crams names into one cell. Use MC-025 attachment for 4+ recipients.
    Recipient 3 Address
    none

    Optional third recipient address.

    • Filer fills address with recipient_3_name blank. Both fields go together.
    • Filer pastes a generic 'address on file' without spelling it out. Per CCP 1013(a), the POS must include the actual mailing address.

    Ezel is a self-help tool. Ezel is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. You are the filer. Review the form carefully before submitting it to the court, and consult a licensed attorney if you have questions about your case. For free legal help, contact your local legal aid office or court self-help center.

    Sources

    Ready to file UD-150?

    You've seen what's involved. Fill UD-150 with Ezel in minutes, not hours.

    One-time, 30-day workspace.