← Browse all forms CIV-100

Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter Default)

Fill it with Ezel. AI intake, blocker review, court-ready PDF.

California · After defendant's response time expires.

File CIV-100 with Ezel

Fill CIV-100 with Ezel

$49 one-time, 30-day workspace

AI-assisted intake, completeness review, and a court-ready PDF for CIV-100 only. Print, sign in pen, file yourself.

Secure payment via Stripe. By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

What Ezel does with CIV-100

Tell Ezel what's going on. The rest is automatic.

Court Filing
Ezel is reading your story…
What Ezel did:
    You describe, Ezel fills. Need help on any field while you fill your form? Tap the question mark and ask. Start filing

    What is CIV-100?

    Asks the clerk to enter the defendant's default after the defendant fails to respond to a complaint. Mandatory in unlawful detainer cases before submitting UD-110 for judgment, and in any general civil case before requesting a default judgment.

    What happens if you miss the deadline: The default cannot be entered until the response time has run; once entered, the defendant has only narrow grounds to set it aside.

    How to file

    Filing fee
    There is no filing fee for CIV-100 itself; the first-appearance fee was paid when the complaint was filed. If a Clerk's Judgment for restitution of premises issues, the writ of execution (EJ-130) has its own modest fee, typically $25-$40.
    Filing method
    in-person, mail, efile (county-specific; many California courts accept e-filing for default requests)
    Filing deadline
    Default cannot be entered until the defendant's response time has run: for unlawful detainer, 10 court days after personal service (or 15 court days after service by mail or Safe at Home) under CCP section 1167 as amended by AB 2347 (Stats. 2024, ch. 512), effective 01/01/2025; for most general civil cases, 30 calendar days under CCP section 412.20. Until default is entered, the defendant can still file an answer; act promptly. There is no formal upper deadline, but California Rules of Court rule 3.110 requires plaintiffs to seek default within 10 days of the response time expiring or face dismissal for failure to prosecute.
    How to serve
    CCP section 587 requires the plaintiff to mail a copy of CIV-100 to each defendant's last-known address (or attorney of record) BEFORE the clerk enters default. The mailing must be declared on item 6 under penalty of perjury. The only exception is when the defendant's address is genuinely unknown (item 6a).
    Wet signature
    Yes, sign in pen after printing.
    Notarization
    No
    Original and copies
    One signed original to the clerk plus one copy for the plaintiff's records. For an unlawful detainer with UD-110 and UD-120 attached, bring two extra copies for the sheriff (writ enforcement) and your records.

    Common pitfalls

    Three highest-leverage checks for the AI review on CIV-100. (1) CCP 587 mailing: item 6 must be filled. Self-represented filers commonly skip item 6 and the clerk bounces the form back. The mailing must happen BEFORE filing CIV-100 with the court. (2) Nonmilitary status (item 8): a default judgment cannot enter without this declaration. The standard pro se path is the SCRA database check (item 8a). (3) Path coherence: in a UD case, the form-title checkboxes 'Entry of Default' and 'Clerk's Judgment' must both be checked plus item 1e(1) for the restitution-only judgment. Missing 1e(1) leads to the clerk entering default but not issuing the writ.

    Don't memorize the rules. Ezel walks you through CIV-100 field by field, flags what the AI review treats as a blocker, and renders a court-ready PDF.

    Start filing →

    You'll likely also file

    Other Ezel-supported forms that commonly file alongside CIV-100. Each one has its own guided fill, AI review, and PDF render.

    UD-110
    Judgment, Unlawful Detainer
    Judgment, Unlawful Detainer. Submitted alongside CIV-100 in the landlord default flow. CIV-100 asks the clerk to enter the tenant's default under Code of Civil Procedure section 585(b) (the clerk's ministerial default-entry function); UD-110 is the proposed judgment the clerk or judge then signs to produce an enforceable possession (and optional money) judgment. Two default paths under CCP 1169 control the UD-110 scope: (a) clerk's judgment for possession only (no money damages) under CCP 1169 first sentence, where the plaintiff submits a UD-110 limited to possession plus costs and the clerk signs without a judge's review (this is the same-day path landlords use when only possession is needed because the tenant abandoned or money damages can be pursued separately); (b) court's judgment under CCP 1169 second sentence, where the plaintiff seeks possession plus damages (unpaid rent listed on the UD-100 complaint, holdover damages at the daily fair-rental value under CCP 1174 and Civ. Code section 1951.2, prejudgment interest under Civ. Code section 3287, attorney fees per lease prevailing-party clause or CCP 1717, costs of suit under CCP 1033.5), and the judge sets damages after a CIV-100 item 2 declaration in prove-up or a short evidentiary hearing under CCP 585(d). CIV-100 without a proposed UD-110 leaves the landlord with default entry but no enforceable judgment, so the EJ-130 writ-of-execution path under CCP 715.010 cannot start; the landlord cannot direct the sheriff to evict the tenant until a signed UD-110 is in the file. The masking rule at CCP 1161.2 applies to the entered UD-110 regardless of whether default or trial produced it.
    POS-030
    Proof of Service by First-Class Mail (Civil)
    Proof of Service by First-Class Mail. Two interactions with CIV-100. (1) The CIV-100 packet itself: Code Civ. Proc. section 587 requires the plaintiff to mail a copy of CIV-100 to the defendant's last known address before or concurrently with filing the request for entry of default, and CIV-100 item 6 has a built-in declaration of mailing where the plaintiff attests to that mailing under CCP 2015.5; no separate POS-030 is needed for the section-587 mailing because item 6 is the proof of service on its face. Some local courts ask for an external POS-030 as a backstop to item 6 (Los Angeles Superior Court rejects CIV-100 without a stamped item 6 OR an attached POS-030 in some courtrooms); the wizard should default to filling item 6 carefully (server name, date, address) and attach POS-030 only if the local court rule requires it. (2) Post-default papers: once the clerk enters default and the court (or clerk under CCP 585(a) on contract claims for a sum certain, or 585(b) on prove-up applications) enters judgment, subsequent papers must be served on the defendant under CCP 1013(a) with POS-030 as the standard civil proof template; this includes the Memorandum of Costs MC-010 (due within 15 days of entry of default under CRC 3.1700(a)(1) plus 10 days to tax under CRC 3.1700(b)(1)), the Abstract of Judgment EJ-001 service on title companies and recorders for real-property liens under CCP 697.310 / 697.320, the writ of execution EJ-130 issuance under CCP 699.530, the Notice of Renewal of Judgment EJ-195 under CCP 683.160 (must be served on the debtor within 30 days of filing the renewal), and any motion to amend judgment to add an alter-ego or successor under CCP 187 / Code of Civil Procedure section 989. (3) Serving the CIV-100 packet on a co-defendant who has already appeared in the case is governed by CCP 1010 'subsequent paper' rules rather than CCP 415's personal-jurisdiction summons rules, and POS-030 documents the CCP 1013(a) mailing. Server must be 18 or older and not a party (CCP 1013(a) and 1013a); the plaintiff cannot mail-serve their own papers. The signed POS-030 is filed with the court so the plaintiff can later prove notice in any motion to vacate the default (CCP 473(b) within 6 months of judgment for mistake / inadvertence / surprise / excusable neglect; 473(d) at any time for facially void judgments such as defective service of the underlying summons under CCP 418.10) or motion to tax costs under CRC 3.1700(b).
    EJ-130
    Writ of Execution
    Writ of Execution. CIV-100 is the predecessor for EJ-130 in two distinct enforcement paths. (1) UD landlord path: after the clerk enters default on CIV-100 under Code of Civil Procedure section 585(b) and issues UD-110 Judgment for Restitution under CCP 1169, the landlord files EJ-130 to obtain the writ of possession the sheriff uses to lock the tenant out (CCP 712.010 makes the writ the enforcement instrument for any judgment; CCP 715.010 applies it to possession judgments specifically). The writ also typically carries the money portion of UD-110 for unpaid rent, holdover damages at the daily fair-rental value under Civ. Code section 1951.2 and CCP 1174, and costs of suit under CCP 1033.5; the sheriff serves a 5-day notice to vacate under CCP 1174.3 and conducts the lockout on day 5 if the tenant has not moved. (2) Money-damages path: when CIV-100 produces a court-default judgment under CCP 585(b) in a small-claims or limited-civil money case, the plaintiff files EJ-130 to obtain a money writ enforced under CCP 699.510 by levy on bank accounts under CCP 700.140, wage garnishment under CCP 706.020, asset seizure under CCP 700.010, or recordation of an abstract of judgment for real-property lien under CCP 697.310. On EJ-130 item 11 (Total judgment as entered or renewed), copy the default-judgment amount verbatim from the signed CIV-100 / JC-100 / UD-110 plus accrued interest under Code of Civil Procedure section 685.010 (10% per annum on civil judgments under Civ. Code section 3289). Writs are valid for 180 days from issuance under CCP 683.020 and CCP 699.530; re-issuance under CCP 712.020 is available if the window lapses without completed enforcement.
    FW-001
    Request to Waive Court Fees
    Request to Waive Court Fees. CIV-100 itself has no separate filing fee; the first-appearance fee was paid (or waived via a prior FW-001 plus FW-003 order) at the complaint stage under Government Code section 70611 for general civil and Gov. Code 70613 for limited civil, so the CIV-100 default-entry filing is administratively free. FW-001 attaches at the downstream steps where new fees do appear: (a) writ of execution on EJ-130 carries a $40 per-writ clerk issuance fee under Gov. Code section 70626(a)(1), plus sheriff or marshal service and levy fees under Gov. Code section 26721 (typically $40-$150 per attempt depending on county; section 70626(c) for the additional per-writ-and-debtor charge); (b) certified copies of the entered judgment and abstract-of-judgment issuance for lien recording under Code of Civil Procedure section 697.310 carry a per-page certification fee under Gov. Code section 70626(b); (c) post-judgment debtor-examination filings under CCP section 708.110 / 708.120 (SC-134 / AT-138) carry separate motion fees in non-small-claims cases. A waiver granted earlier in the case usually carries forward under Gov. Code section 68632(c) and California Rules of Court rule 3.55 so the prevailing plaintiff does not refile FW-001 at each post-judgment step. If the plaintiff's financial situation improved since the original waiver, the plaintiff has a disclosure duty under Gov. Code section 68636 and should file an updated FW-001. In UD cases, landlord plaintiffs rarely qualify on the 125% FPG income test under CRC 3.55(b) (property income usually exceeds the threshold) but small-property owners on means-tested benefits qualify under CRC 3.55(a); small-claims and civil-collection plaintiffs who filed an initial FW-001 typically ride that grant through to EJ-130.
    UD-105
    Answer to Unlawful Detainer
    Answer (Unlawful Detainer). UD-105 is the tenant-side companion to CIV-100, and the existence (or absence) of a filed UD-105 is the single gating fact for whether a landlord can file CIV-100. CIV-100 is appropriate only when the tenant did not file UD-105 within the response window of Code Civ. Proc. section 1167 (10 court days after personal service of the summons, or 15 court days after service by mail or Safe at Home; section 1167 amended by AB 2347, effective 01/01/2025), leaving the case ripe for default. A landlord checking the case docket before filing CIV-100 should also confirm no UD-105 alternative was filed, including a Cal. Rules of Court 3.1320 demurrer, a CCP 418.10 motion to quash for defective service, a CCP 170.6 challenge to the judge, a CCP 425.10 cross-complaint, or a notice of related case; any of these is an appearance that defeats default. UD-105 may also be filed under a fictitious-name DOE allegation if the landlord named DOES on UD-100 and the tenant matches one of them. Once the tenant files UD-105 (or any appearance equivalent above), the path forward shifts entirely from default-judgment via CIV-100 plus UD-110 to a contested trial scheduled by UD-150 under the 20-day fast-trial clock of CCP 1170.5(a); a CIV-100 filed in the face of a timely UD-105 is rejected by the clerk for misuse of the default procedure under CCP 585(b). For tenants past the deadline, set-aside is still available under CCP 473(b) (mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect; 6-month outside limit) or CCP 473.5 (lack of actual notice of summons; 2-year outside limit), but the relief is discretionary and the underlying default judgment continues to threaten possession until set aside.
    FL-180
    Judgment (Family Law)
    Judgment (Family Law). Required precursor for the default FL-180 path: when an FL-100 respondent was personally served with FL-110 (Summons) under Code of Civil Procedure section 415.10 (or substituted under CCP 415.20(b) with the prescribed 10-day mailing follow-up, or out-of-state under CCP 415.40) and failed to file FL-120 within the 30-day response window under Family Code section 2020 and CCP 412.20(a)(3), the petitioner must obtain entry of default before the court will sign FL-180. The proper default vehicle in family-law dissolution, legal separation, and nullity cases is FL-165 (Request to Enter Default), not CIV-100 itself, because FL-165 carries the family-law-specific FC 2104 / 2105 disclosure-status boxes the CIV-100 general-civil form lacks; many family-law clerks reject a CIV-100 filed in a dissolution case and instruct the petitioner to refile on FL-165, though a minority of counties accept CIV-100 with a family-law caption as long as no FL-165 already governs. Item 3.a on FL-180 is checked when the case proceeded by default. The full default prove-up packet under CRC 5.405 typically includes the default request (FL-165 / CIV-100), FL-170 (Declaration for Default or Uncontested Dissolution), the petitioner's final disclosure FL-141 (with FC 2107(c) waiving the petitioner's right to the respondent's final disclosure in true default), FL-180 (judgment), FL-190 (Notice of Entry of Judgment prepared for the clerk to mail), and FL-160 / FL-345 / FL-342 / FL-343 attachments for property, custody, child support, and spousal support. A court that signs FL-180 without a prior default entry creates an irregular judgment subject to CCP 473(d) set-aside.
    UD-150
    Request/Counter-Request to Set Case for Trial, Unlawful Detainer
    Request/Counter-Request to Set Case for Trial (Unlawful Detainer) (anti-recommendation). The alternative landlord move at the post-answer fork. CIV-100 enters default because no UD-105 (or UD-105 alternative under California Rules of Court 3.1320 / 3.1322: motion to quash under CCP 418.10, demurrer under CCP 430.10, motion to strike under CCP 435) was filed within the Code Civ. Proc. section 1167 window (5 court days after personal service of summons; 15 court days after CCP 415.30 mail with notice and acknowledgement; 10-15 court days after CCP 415.20 substituted service plus mailing; longer windows after CCP 415.50 publication or AB 2347 / Safe at Home protected-address pathways). If the tenant DID file a UD-105 answer or any of the alternative responsive pleadings, the landlord sets the case for fast trial via UD-150 instead and the section 1170.5(a) 20-court-day trial clock starts on UD-150 service. The two forms are mutually exclusive on the same complaint: filing CIV-100 when an answer or alternative pleading is on file gets rejected at the counter under CCP 585.5 and may expose the landlord to CCP 128.7(c) sanctions for filing a paper unsupported by the record; filing UD-150 when default is available wastes the 20-day trial clock and signals to the court the landlord misread the docket. Before filing CIV-100, search the case file for any UD-105 or general appearance (docket review at the clerk's office or via the case-management portal); before filing UD-150, confirm the answer date in the file. After CIV-100 entry of default, the tenant's only set-aside route is CCP 473(b) (mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect within 6 months) or CCP 473.5 (lack of actual notice within 2 years), so the wizard should warn the landlord that filing CIV-100 prematurely creates an avoidable set-aside risk that delays the UD-110 judgment and SHC eviction lockout by months. UD-150 is the right move whenever any UD-105 alternative is on file, including a partial-denial answer that disputes habitability or service.
    MC-025
    Attachment to Judicial Council Form
    Continuation page for CIV-100 (Request for Entry of Default). Item 1.c is a single free-text line listing the defaulting defendants by name; multi-defendant cases (multiple individual occupants of one unit in a UD action, an LLC plus its members in a contract action, a married couple jointly named in a tort or contract action, or any case with 3+ defendants) routinely outgrow it, and MC-025 is the standard overflow. Title the continuation 'Attachment 1.c to CIV-100 (Request for Entry of Default)' so the clerk and the assigned judge can match it to the request line, and write 'See Attachment 1.c' on the form face. MC-025 is recognized in every CA case type as the structured continuation vehicle; clerks accept it as part of CIV-100 without separate fee. Other CIV-100 items that overflow onto MC-025. (1) Item 2 (judgment-amount itemization) for cases with prejudgment interest computed under Civil Code section 3287 (statutory 7 percent for liquidated damages from the date the right to recover vested; 10 percent for unpaid rent or other contract damages under Civ 3289; pre-judgment-interest math may require a separate MC-025 attachment showing the per-diem calculation). (2) Item 2 attorney's fees claimed under a lease provision invoking Civ Code section 1717 (reciprocal-fee statute that makes a one-sided contractual fee clause bilateral; Hsu v. Abbara 9 Cal.4th 863, holding section 1717 fees mandatory to prevailing party on contract under reciprocal lease fee clause). (3) Costs under CCP 1033.5 (filing fees, service fees, deposition costs, witness fees, transcript costs); the MC-025 attachment itemizes each cost claim with declaration support. (4) Prevailing-party bonus under any contract clause that exceeds CCP 1033.5(c)(4) reasonableness limits. (5) Item 5 declaration (mandatory CCP 585.5 declaration of non-military service required when the defaulting party is an individual, citing the SCRA at 50 USC 3931); when the declarant needs more space to recite SCRA search results from the Department of Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) at scra.dmdc.osd.mil, the MC-025 attaches the DMDC certificate and explains the search method (full name, last 4 of SSN or DOB) under penalty of perjury. (6) Item 6 mailing certificate for cases with multiple defendants at different addresses (CCP 587 requires mailing to each defaulting party's last-known address; multi-address cases need MC-025 to list each defendant's mailing address). Caption mechanics. Each MC-025 attachment lists the case caption (CRC 1.110 and 2.111), case number, and the precise CIV-100 item it continues at the top. Per CRC 2.108 and 2.109 the MC-025 must be 12-point or larger font with 1.5 line spacing minimum, consecutively numbered pages, and 28 lines per page max. The court file's logical reading order is CIV-100 face followed by each MC-025 attachment in item order; misordered attachments slow clerk review. Signature mechanics. Sign MC-025 separately under penalty of perjury (CCP 2015.5) only if it adds sworn factual averments (e.g. an SCRA search declaration under CCP 585.5 and 50 USC 3931; a verification of mailing under CCP 587 to multiple addresses; a calculation of prejudgment interest under Civ 3287 supporting item 2). The CIV-100 verification itself (item 7 under CCP 585(a) and (b)) covers the attached items if the same plaintiff or counsel signs the underlying CIV-100, but a sworn declaration on MC-025 provides belt-and-suspenders proof that becomes essential if the default is later attacked under CCP 473(b) or 473.5. UD case use. Unlawful detainer cases use the same CIV-100 + MC-025 mechanic when the landlord named multiple tenants under one address. Each tenant gets a separate line in MC-025 (full name as it appears in the lease and on the UD-100; address; date of personal or substituted service; service method under CCP 415.10, 415.20(b), 415.45, or post-and-mail under 1162(a)(3)). CCP 1169 default-judgment-by-default in UD requires CIV-100 plus a separate UD-110 (Judgment, Unlawful Detainer) submitted concurrently; the MC-025 in a UD default packet attaches to CIV-100 even when the substantive judgment terms (rent owed, holdover damages, lockout date) appear on UD-110. Common rejection causes for missing or defective MC-025. Clerks reject CIV-100 packets that list 'See Attachment 1.c' on the face but the attachment is missing from the file; or list defaulting defendants on the CIV-100 face but service proofs cross-reference defendants who were not included on CIV-100 item 1.c (mismatch between CIV-100 list and POS-010 / POS-030 / SC-104 service proofs); or attempt to default a defendant whose service was defective under CCP 415 et seq. (Bonita Packing Co. v. Floyd 53 Cal.App.4th 1737 on service-defect challenges to default). Fix: re-serve and re-file; or amend CIV-100 to remove the non-defaulting defendant. Anti-recommendation. Do NOT use MC-025 to claim damages or relief that exceed what the underlying complaint (UD-100 or COMPLAINT-100) demanded; CCP 580(a) bars a default judgment in excess of the demand stated in the complaint (Becker v. S.P.V. Const. Co. 27 Cal.3d 489; Stein v. York 181 Cal.App.4th 320). MC-025 attached to CIV-100 cannot expand the prayer; the plaintiff must amend the complaint and re-serve before CIV-100 can recapture the new amount.

    Field-by-field guidance

    We've mapped every field on CIV-100: what it asks, what counts as a blocker, what trips most filers up. Ezel applies all of it as you fill. Plain-English questions in, court-ready PDF out.

    34 fields handled for you. You don't have to read them all.

    Start for $49 →
    Or read all 34 fields yourself
    Your Name
    blocker

    Caption must identify the attorney or self-represented party.

    • Filers list a nickname or middle initial that does not match how their name appears on the complaint. The clerk matches caption-to-caption; mismatches slow processing.
    • Filers leave the caption attorney/party block blank because they are pro se. The block is required for self-represented filers too; it identifies who the court reaches with orders.
    Firm Name
    none

    Attorneys only.

    • Pro se filers fill this with their employer or 'self-represented'. Leave this row blank when not represented by a law firm.
    • Attorneys list only the lead partner's last name without 'LLP' or 'PC'. Match the law firm's official registered business name.
    Bar Number
    none

    Attorneys only.

    • Pro se filers type their CA driver's license number here. Bar number is the State Bar of California license number; pro se filers leave blank.
    • Out-of-state attorneys fill in their home-state bar number. CA Rules of Court 2.111 expects the CA bar number; out-of-state counsel must associate local counsel and use that bar number.
    Your Street
    blocker

    Caption address required.

    • Filers use the rental property's address (the same address they're suing about) when they live elsewhere. Use the address where the court can actually reach the filer with mail.
    • Filers list a P.O. box only and skip the street. Per Rule 2.111 the caption needs a physical or mail address; a P.O. box alone is acceptable for mailing but list a real street if available.
    Your City
    blocker

    Address part.

    • Filers spell the city differently than the USPS standard (e.g., 'St Louis' vs 'Saint Louis'). Use the USPS-preferred spelling so the clerk's mail merge matches.
    • Filers list the county here instead of the city. The caption wants city, not county.
    Your State
    blocker

    Address part. Defaults to CA.

    • Filers spell out 'California' when the field expects 'CA'. The two-letter USPS code is the convention; the clerk's database normalizes either, but two letters fits the form layout.
    • Filers list a state different from where they receive mail. The caption address is the address the court uses for orders; use the actual mail-receiving state.
    Your Zip
    blocker

    Address part.

    • Filers paste ZIP+4 with the dash; the form's narrow box may truncate the +4. Use the 5-digit ZIP unless the form clearly accepts ZIP+4.
    • Filers guess at a ZIP from memory and miss by one digit. Verify against the USPS lookup so court mail reaches the filer.
    Your Phone
    blocker

    Required.

    • Filers list a phone they no longer use. The court calls this number for hearing notifications; pick a reachable number.
    • Filers list a work number where they cannot speak privately about the case. Use a personal number when possible.
    Your Email
    none

    Optional in practice for self-represented filers.

    • Filers paste an email they rarely check. If the case later moves to e-service, this becomes the address the court uses; pick one the filer actually monitors.
    • Pro se filers worry a blank email gets the form rejected. It does not for paper filings; rule 2.111(1) reads strictly to require email but clerks accept blanks for self-represented filers.
    Atty For
    blocker

    Identifies who the filer represents.

    • Pro se filers leave this blank or write 'myself'. Use 'Plaintiff in Pro Per' or 'Plaintiff, in Propria Persona' so the court understands the role.
    • Filers in joint cases list only one party. If multiple plaintiffs share counsel (or pro se status), name all parties the filer represents.
    Court County
    blocker

    Court county on caption.

    • Filers list the county they live in instead of the county where the case is venued. The case venue is set on the complaint; copy from the complaint caption.
    • Filers add 'County of' as a prefix when the form already has a 'COUNTY OF' label. Type only the county name.
    Court Street
    blocker

    Court street address.

    • Filers list the courthouse name instead of the street address. Use the street address so the caption matches the format clerks expect.
    • Filers use an old courthouse address after a courthouse move. Verify against the county's current Find Your Court page.
    Court Mailing
    none

    Optional; only when different from street.

    • Filers fill this when the courthouse uses the same address for mail. If the court mailing address equals the street address, leave this blank.
    • Filers list their own P.O. Box. This is the COURT's mailing address, not the filer's.
    Court City Zip
    blocker

    Court city and ZIP.

    • Filers list only the city and skip the ZIP. The caption needs both for routing in counties with multiple courthouses.
    • Filers use the ZIP of an old courthouse location. Verify against the court's current website.
    Court Branch
    blocker

    Branch name required for routing in counties with multiple courthouses.

    • Filers leave this blank in counties with multiple branches (LA, San Diego, Orange, Sacramento). The clerk routes to the wrong branch and the file gets stuck in inter-branch transfer.
    • Filers type the courthouse's informal name ('downtown') instead of the official branch name ('Stanley Mosk Courthouse'). Use the formal name from the court's website.
    Case Number
    blocker

    Case number on every page.

    • Filers type the docket-card number with hyphens different from the official case number. Match the case number on the complaint's file-stamp exactly.
    • Filers omit the leading prefix ('22STUD' vs '22UD' for LA) thinking it's optional. The full case number with prefix is what clerks search.
    Plaintiff Caption
    blocker

    Plaintiff name on caption matches the original Complaint exactly.

    • Filers shorten a business name ('Smith Properties' instead of 'Smith Properties LLC'). The caption must match the complaint exactly, including suffixes.
    • Filers list only one plaintiff when the complaint had multiple. Use the same caption block as the complaint, including 'et al.' if the complaint used it.
    Defendant Caption
    blocker

    Defendant name(s) on caption. If multiple defendants, list all.

    • Filers list only the named defendants and skip 'DOES 1-X' if the complaint included Doe defendants. Match the complaint caption.
    • Filers shorten multiple defendants to the first plus 'et al.' when the form expects all named defendants. Read the form: caption block usually wants the full list, with 'et al.' as overflow only.
    Request Path
    blocker

    Mutual exclusive request path. The 'UD default + clerk's judgment for restitution only' path is the most common for pro se landlords; clerk both enters default AND issues judgment of possession in one trip. The 'default only' path enters default without judgment, leaving the user to bring UD-110 separately.

    • Pro se landlords check 'default only' (1d) when they actually want both default + clerk's judgment for possession (need 1c entry of default + 1e clerk's judgment + 1e(1) restitution-only sub-box). Without 1e(1) the clerk enters default but does not issue the writ of possession.
    • Filers in general-civil money cases check 1e (clerk's judgment) thinking 'judgment is judgment'. Money judgments require court judgment under 585(b)/(c), not clerk's judgment; pick 1d, not 1e.
    Complaint Filed Date
    blocker

    Date the complaint was filed and stamped by the clerk. Without this date the clerk can't match this request to the case file.

    • Filers use the date they signed the complaint instead of the date the clerk file-stamped it. Use the file-stamp date; the signature date can be days earlier.
    • Filers misread the file stamp's smudge or use the date of a later amended complaint. Use the date of the original complaint that started the action.
    Filer Name Item 1b
    blocker

    Plaintiff name. Same as caption plaintiff.

    • Filers type a different version of the plaintiff name here than in the caption (e.g., adds 'Mr.' or shortens 'Robert' to 'Bob'). Match the caption exactly.
    • Joint plaintiff cases list only one name. Both names go here if both appear in the caption.
    Default Defendants
    blocker

    Names of defendants whose default is being requested. Must match the Complaint and POS-010 exactly.

    • Filers list every defendant including those who already answered. Default goes only against defendants who failed to answer; an already-answered defendant cannot be defaulted.
    • Filers misspell a defendant's name slightly differently than on POS-010 (proof of service). The clerk cross-checks the request against POS-010; a mismatch means the clerk cannot confirm service.
    Include Unnamed Occupants
    info

    Conditional: only check this box if the Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession (CP10.5) was actually served with the summons. If checked without CP10.5 having been served, the judgment is vulnerable to challenge from any unnamed occupant.

    • Landlords check this box hoping it forecloses unnamed-occupant claims, without having served Form CP10.5 (Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession). Without CP10.5 service, an unnamed occupant can challenge the eviction even after default.
    • Filers leave this blank when CP10.5 was served. Check the box so the judgment binds unnamed occupants too.
    Uda Used
    blocker

    Required disclosure. Software is not an LDA/UDA. Truthful answer for self-help users using only software is 'did not.'

    • Filers worry that using legal-tech software (Ezel, LegalZoom, etc.) makes them an LDA/UDA. Software is not an LDA; the truthful answer for self-help users is 'did not.'
    • Filers who DID use a paid LDA leave this blank to avoid disclosure. The disclosure is mandatory; non-disclosure is itself grounds for sanctions.
    Mailing Status
    blocker

    Mailing of CIV-100 to defendants is required by CCP section 587. The clerk will reject CIV-100 if item 6 is blank or shows no mailing was done. Mail BEFORE filing the original.

    • Filers skip the CCP 587 mailing entirely and leave item 6 blank. The clerk rejects the form back; the mailing must happen BEFORE the clerk enters default.
    • Filers mail the request after they file with the clerk. CCP 587 sequence: mail first, then file. Reversing the order is the most common reason the clerk bounces a CIV-100.
    Mailing Unknown Names
    warning

    Required if mailing status is 'unknown address'; otherwise blank.

    • Filers fill this when they do know the defendant's address but find it inconvenient to mail. The 'unknown address' path requires actual unknown address; misuse is a perjury exposure on item 6a's declaration.
    • Filers list a defendant whose address is known but stale. Stale-but-likely-correct address still requires mailing; only genuinely unknown qualifies for item 6a.
    Mailing Date
    warning

    Date mailed. Required if mailing was done.

    • Filers list the date they intend to mail rather than the actual date of mailing. Use the postmark date.
    • Filers list a mailing date AFTER the file-stamp date on the request. The mailing must precede filing per CCP 587; an after-filing date triggers clerk rejection.
    Mailing Recipients
    warning

    Names and addresses on the envelopes. Required if mailing was done.

    • Filers list only one defendant when multiple were mailed. List all envelopes mailed (one per defaulted defendant).
    • Filers paste a generic 'last known address' without spelling out the address. List name + full address for each envelope; clerks have rejected requests with 'last known address' alone.
    Nonmilitary Basis
    blocker

    Required for any default judgment. Most pro se landlords use the SCRA database check at scra.dmdc.osd.mil and select item 8a. If the defendant is a business entity, choose item 8e (not eligible to serve).

    • Filers check item 8a (SCRA database verification) without actually running the check at scra.dmdc.osd.mil and attaching the printout. The clerk wants the printout; the checkbox alone is not enough.
    • Filers default a business entity defendant (LLC, corporation) and check item 8a (individual SCRA check). Business entities are not SCRA-eligible; check item 8e instead.
    Page1 Sign Date
    blocker

    Date and signature of the plaintiff or attorney. Without a date the request cannot be processed.

    • Filers post-date the signature thinking the form will be filed later. Use today's date; if the filing is delayed, re-sign and re-date.
    • Filers leave the date blank because they signed in the parking lot before walking in. Date and sign together; an undated signature can be rejected as procedurally defective.
    Page1 Sign Name
    blocker

    Printed name of declarant.

    • Filers print a nickname under the signature. Print the legal name as it appears in the caption.
    • Filers leave the printed name blank because the cursive signature is 'enough'. Print legibly so docket entries use the right spelling.
    Page2 Decl1 Date
    blocker

    Required date for the under-penalty-of-perjury declaration covering items 4 (UDA), 5 (Rees-Levering), and 6 (mailing).

    • Filers date this declaration BEFORE they actually mailed the CIV-100 to defendants. Item 6 declares mailing under penalty of perjury; the declaration date must be on or after the mailing date.
    • Filers re-use the page 1 date without re-dating page 2. Each declaration block needs its own date because each can be signed at a different time.
    Page2 Decl1 Name
    blocker

    Printed name of declarant.

    • Filers print the name of the LDA/UDA who helped instead of the plaintiff who is declaring. The declarant is the plaintiff (or the plaintiff's attorney).
    • Filers list a different name spelling than page 1. Mismatched declarant names are a common reason clerks ask for a corrected request.
    Page3 Decl Date
    blocker

    Date of the nonmilitary declaration.

    • Filers date this BEFORE running the SCRA database check. The nonmilitary declaration must be made AFTER the SCRA verification was performed; the SCRA printout's date should be on or before this declaration date.
    • Filers leave page 3 blank because they only need 'default'. Page 3 is required whenever a default JUDGMENT is sought; clerk's judgment for possession is a judgment for SCRA purposes.

    Ezel is a self-help tool. Ezel is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. You are the filer. Review the form carefully before submitting it to the court, and consult a licensed attorney if you have questions about your case. For free legal help, contact your local legal aid office or court self-help center.

    Sources

    Ready to file CIV-100?

    You've seen what's involved. Fill CIV-100 with Ezel in minutes, not hours.

    One-time, 30-day workspace.