New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Ethics Opinions

Free plain-English summaries of legal ethics opinions issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, with full citations and source links on every page.

558 opinions · Updated October 19, 2026
558 opinions

No New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics opinions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

Can the counsel to a city housing authority appear for private clients before that city's board of adjustment, planning board, or other agencies?

The Committee concluded they cannot. Counsel to a city housing authority has the entire municipality as his client, so he may not appear for private clients before the city's board of adjustment,…

December 26, 1963

Can a New Jersey lawyer list other-state bar memberships or professional certificates in a yellow-pages telephone directory listing?

No. The Committee concluded that any yellow-pages listing that departs from the plain, uniform listing of lawyers, including one showing other bar memberships or certificates, is improper advertising.

December 26, 1963

Can a lawyer who sits on a municipal zoning board of adjustment, or a member of that lawyer's firm, represent private clients before the same town's boards and governing body?

No. The Committee concluded that neither the zoning-board member nor any member of the lawyer's firm may appear for private clients before the municipality's planning board, zoning board, or…

December 26, 1963

Can a lawyer accept retainers from a group of homeowners who were solicited as a class, when only one of them originally sought the lawyer's advice?

No. The Committee concluded the lawyer should not accept retainers from the solicited claimants, because soliciting strangers in the same class as an existing client improperly stirs up litigation;…

December 26, 1963

Can a municipal prosecutor who was excused from a disorderly-persons case involving a client and the client's wife later prepare a separation agreement for that client?

Yes. The Committee concluded the later representation was not a violation, because the prosecutor had no personal connection with the investigation or prosecution of the disorderly-persons case and…

December 19, 1963

Can a lawyer who approved a sales agreement for a buyer later represent the seller in suing that buyer for default under the same agreement?

No. The Committee concluded it is improper, because the representation might require the lawyer to assert a claim under the very agreement he approved for the former client, and a lawyer should not…

December 19, 1963

Can a lawyer who works for a state agency be assigned to represent an indigent criminal defendant, or must he be excused because he is a state employee?

He may serve. The Committee concluded there is no impropriety or conflict merely because the assigned attorney is a state employee, except where the charged crime involves the State itself, in which…

December 19, 1963

Can members of a law firm jointly donate to a community hospital and have their names placed on a donor plaque without it being improper advertising?

Yes. The Committee concluded a joint gift with the donors' names on a plaque is not improper, because they give as individual members of the community, not as attorneys, where the plaque does not…

December 19, 1963

Can a lawyer give a former client's information and a substitution of attorney to another lawyer without the former client's consent?

No. The Committee concluded the former lawyer may not furnish the requested information or give the substitution without informing the former client and obtaining his consent, because the matters…

December 19, 1963

Can a lawyer let his name or his firm's name be printed on the business card of an investigator who works on the firm's cases?

No. The Committee concluded it is improper, because the card could lead to abuses and could be taken as a representation that a layman is associated in the practice of law.

November 7, 1963

Can a lawyer keep a percentage or rebate paid by a title insurance company on the client's transaction?

Only with the client's consent after full disclosure. The Committee concluded the lawyer may keep a title-insurance rebate if the client consents after full disclosure; if the client refuses, the…

November 7, 1963

Can an attorney who also serves as a municipal clerk represent defendants in that municipality's municipal court?

No. The Committee concluded it is improper, applying the same principle that bars a member of a municipal governing body from practicing before its municipal court, because the clerk is identified…

November 7, 1963

May a seller's or lender's attorney close title for a development home advertised with 'No Closing Fees'?

The Committee concluded that the attorney appearing at the closing under the circumstances inquired about acts improperly. It also found a clandestine conflict when the seller's lawyer closes title…

July 25, 1963

Can a new attorney take over a client's civil case when the prior attorney, who filed nothing, refuses to sign a substitution of attorney over an unpaid fee?

Yes. The Committee concluded the new attorney may proceed to defend the client without a substitution, because the client's right to counsel of his own choice is paramount to any fee dispute, and…

1963

In New Jersey, can a lawyer who is a State Police officer also serve as a municipal prosecutor?

No. The Committee concluded that serving simultaneously as a New Jersey State Police officer and as a municipal prosecutor created an appearance of impropriety under the then-existing RPC 1.7(c)(2)…

Can a New Jersey law firm hire a second firm to do legal work for its clients, and must it tell the client about the arrangement?

Yes, a firm may retain a second firm to perform legal services much as it would use a temporary or contract lawyer, provided there are no conflicts of interest and no improper exposure of one firm's…

If a lawyer accepts an unpaid county appointment (planning board, park commission, county college), how is it decided which client matters the firm must then decline?

The opinion concluded the Committee would not create a formula and that whether the appointment is paid is irrelevant; under the Supreme Court's Perillo standard, the lawyer must decide, case by…

Can a municipal court judge share a law practice with a municipal prosecutor from another town, and may the judge's firm handle a criminal appeal arising from his own court's county?

The supplement concluded a municipal court judge may associate with a municipal prosecutor of another municipality only if the other lawyers refrain from all criminal-defense work within the county…

Browse New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics opinions by topic

Legal ethics opinions from the New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics interpret the rules of professional conduct for working lawyers, in response to inquiries from members and committees. The Supreme Court of New Jersey has held that the Advisory Committee's published opinions are binding on the ethics committees that decide grievances (R. 1:19-6), and that a lawyer who does not follow one "does so at his peril" (Higgins v. Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, 73 N.J. 123 (1977)). The Court can modify or vacate an opinion. Source. Every opinion above has a plain-English question and short answer, plus a link to the original source on the bar's site.

Ethics opinions from other bars

Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct of the District of Columbia Courts (15) Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission (967) Alabama State Bar (139) Alaska Bar Association (146) American Bar Association (150) Arkansas Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (120) Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee (203) Colorado Bar Association (113) Colorado Judicial Ethics Advisory Board (82) Connecticut Bar Association (73) Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court (19) District of Columbia Bar (182) Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee (185) Illinois State Bar Association (389) Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission (13) Kentucky Bar Association (380) Los Angeles County Bar Association (100) Louisiana State Bar Association (22) Maine Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (57) Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar (217) Maryland Judicial Ethics Committee (256) Massachusetts Bar Association (127) Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (26) Mississippi Judicial Election Oversight Committee (9) Nebraska Judicial Ethics Committee (122) Nebraska Supreme Court Lawyers' Advisory Committee (279) New Hampshire Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (24) New Hampshire Bar Association (35) New Mexico Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Conduct (193) New York City Bar (180) New York State Bar Association (932) North Carolina State Bar (578) Office of Legal Ethics Counsel & Advisory Committee of the Supreme Court of Missouri (930) Ohio Board of Professional Conduct (453) Oklahoma Bar Association (328) Orange County Bar Association (17) Oregon State Bar (196) Pennsylvania Bar Association (21) Rhode Island Supreme Court Ethics Advisory Panel (700) South Carolina Bar (505) South Dakota Special Committee on Judicial Election Campaign Intervention (20) State Bar Association of North Dakota (195) State Bar of Arizona (304) State Bar of California (189) State Bar of Georgia (65) State Bar of Michigan (245) State Bar of Montana (78) State Bar of Nevada (61) State Bar of New Mexico (90) State Bar of Wisconsin (263) Texas Professional Ethics Committee (707) The Florida Bar (543) The Mississippi Bar (162) Utah Courts Ethics Advisory Committee (19) Utah State Bar Ethics Advisory Opinion Committee (102) Vermont Bar Association (315) Vermont Judicial Ethics Committee (23) Virginia State Bar (299) Washington State Bar Association (1104) West Virginia Judicial Investigation Commission (773) West Virginia State Bar (Lawyer Disciplinary Board) (104) Wyoming Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (18)