May a judge certify factual practice information for a lawyer’s admission in another state?

Short answer The Committee allowed a judge to certify known facts about a lawyer’s appearances and, if certain, bar membership dates, where the form offered no recommendation or evaluation.
Bar
JUDICIAL-NE
Issued
August 10, 1989

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A judge was asked to complete an Illinois bar proof-of-practice form for a former Nebraska lawyer who had appeared before the judge. The judge proposed stating the dates and facts of those appearances and dates of Nebraska bar membership.

The Committee said a factual certificate about appearances and cases was permissible if it added no recommendation or evaluation. If the judge was certain of the lawyer’s good-standing dates, listing those also violated no canon, although the bar secretary could provide that information more appropriately.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1989, before Nebraska's adoption of the 2011 Revised Code of Judicial Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific requirement.

Common questions

Q: Could the judge confirm court appearances?

A: Yes. The opinion allowed certification of known facts and dates without a recommendation or evaluation.

Q: Could the judge confirm good-standing dates?

A: Yes, if certain of them; the Committee noted that the bar secretary might be a more appropriate source.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied former Nebraska Canon 2’s appearance-of-impropriety rule to a factual bar-admission certificate.

Citations and references

Former Nebraska Code of Judicial Conduct: Canon 2. Earlier opinion discussed: Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion 89-2.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Full opinion text unavailable from the official source; see the linked source above for the complete text.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1989. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace