Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
All 51 flagged citations have been read; the confirmed criticism is listed below.
51 later cases cite Yick Wo v. Hopkins; 51 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Yick Wo v. Hopkins?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Criticized
-
The Montana Supreme Court expressed reluctance to accept Yick Wo's doctrine but held it binding and affirmed the judgment on its authority.
Quong Wing v. Kirkendall · Supreme Court of Montana · filed
However reluctant we may be to subscribe to the doctrine announced in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, above, the decision in that case is binding upon us. Upon the authority of the former decision of this case by the supreme court of the United States, and the case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins, above, the judgment is affirmed.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Yick Wo v. Hopkins and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace