United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township Of Warrington, Pa
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Other nearby adverse language concerned unrelated cases, appeared in history parentheticals, or came from nonprecedential filings rather than a treating court. The seven later opinions applied United Artists on dicta, review standards, the law of the case, or its substantive due process rule. No higher court, en banc Third Circuit opinion, or operative panel decision wounded United Artists.
184 later cases cite United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township Of Warrington, Pa; 170 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township Of Warrington, Pa?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.
Every one of the 170 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township Of Warrington, Pa and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace