Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Tahoe-Sierra's separate takings holding concerning temporary development moratoria was not disturbed. The confirmed treatment is listed below. All 35 flagged citations have been read.
35 later cases cite Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; 35 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The en banc Ninth Circuit overruled Tahoe-Sierra insofar as it allowed a panel to depart from an earlier published circuit opinion under a law of the case exception.
Gonzalez v. Arizona · Ninth Circuit (en banc) · filed
To the extent that our prior cases suggested otherwise, see Jeffries, 114 F.3d at 1492-93; Mendenhall, 213 F.3d at 469 n. 3; Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc., 216 F.3d at 786-88, they are overruled.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace