Case Citator › United States v. Gabriel Pacheco-Zepeda

United States v. Gabriel Pacheco-Zepeda

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Ninth Circuit
Citation
234 F.3d 411
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
164 of 164
Citing cases (total)
382
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. United States v. Gabriel Pacheco-Zepeda remains good law: all 164 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. Later opinions repeatedly applied its holding that Apprendi v. New Jersey left the prior-conviction exception in place.
More on how this was screened

Arguments that the exception had lost force were rejected; other opinions applied the rule's own boundary or discussed separate precedents.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

382 later cases cite United States v. Gabriel Pacheco-Zepeda; 164 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on United States v. Gabriel Pacheco-Zepeda?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 164 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads United States v. Gabriel Pacheco-Zepeda and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace