Case Citator › United States v. Elvis Fredy Camacho-Ibarquen

United States v. Elvis Fredy Camacho-Ibarquen

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Eleventh Circuit
Citation
410 F.3d 1307
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
108 of 108
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Good law: all 108 flagged citations for United States v. Camacho-Ibarquen have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. The reviewed opinions followed its holding that Almendarez-Torres remains binding until the Supreme Court overrules it, repeated Camacho-Ibarquen's observation that later decisions had cast doubt on Almendarez-Torres rather than on Camacho-Ibarquen itself, applied its rule-of-lenity formulation, or used nearby adverse language for another authority.
Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

108 citations to United States v. Elvis Fredy Camacho-Ibarquen sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on United States v. Elvis Fredy Camacho-Ibarquen?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 108 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads United States v. Elvis Fredy Camacho-Ibarquen and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace