Case Citator › Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents

Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Overruled in part
Court
Eleventh Circuit
Citation
212 F.3d 571
Decided
Confirmed treatments
2
Flagged citations read
69 of 69
Citing cases (total)
69
Treatment dates
2007–2008
Overruled in part
A reviewed court has overruled part of this case’s holding. Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents was overruled in part: all 69 flagged citations have been read, and the 2 confirmed treatments are listed below. The Eleventh Circuit held that Burlington Northern displaced Gupta's requirement that retaliation affect an employee's job conditions.
More on how this was screened

Gupta's separate hostile work environment analysis remains applicable.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

69 later cases cite Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents; 69 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Overruled in Part

  • The Eleventh Circuit held that Burlington Northern rejected Gupta's rule requiring a substantial employment action for a Title VII retaliation claim.

    Crawford v. Carroll · Eleventh Circuit · filed

    Thus, the Burlington Court effectively rejected the standards applied by this court in both Stavropoulos and Gupta that required an employee to show either an ultimate employment decision or substantial employment action ...
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Questioned

  • The Eleventh Circuit questioned whether Gupta's retaliation standard remained valid after Burlington Northern.

    Samuel Moore, Jr. v. ITT Technical Institute · Eleventh Circuit (unpublished) · filed

    That holding calls into question the accuracy of the district court’s statement of the requirements to establish a prima facie case for retaliation, as well as the continued validity of statements in several of this circuit’s opinions. See, e.g. Bass v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, Orange County, Fla., 256 F.3d 1095, 1117 (11th Cir. 2001); Gupta v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 212 F.3d 571, 587 (11th Cir. 2000).
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace