Unwin v. Campbell
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The First Circuit acknowledged in Stella v. Kelley, 63 F.3d 71, 74 (1st Cir. 1995), that Unwin and its progeny were no longer good law on that point. Unwin's other holdings about the officers' conduct were not addressed.
28 later cases cite Unwin v. Campbell; 28 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Unwin v. Campbell?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Abrogated
-
The Supreme Court rejected Unwin's rule allowing an immediate qualified immunity appeal over the sufficiency of the evidence.
Johnson v. Jones · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
Unwin v. Campbell, 863 F. 2d 124, 128 (CA1 *309 1988) (saying that appellate jurisdiction does exist); ... This kind of order, we conclude, is not appealable.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Unwin v. Campbell and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace