Case Citator › Ernest Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers, Local 231, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO

Ernest Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers, Local 231, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Sixth Circuit
Citation
829 F.2d 1370
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
40 of 40
Citing cases (total)
40
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Ernest Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers, Local 231, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO remains good law: all 40 flagged citations have been read, and no adverse treatment was confirmed. Later courts continue to apply its rule that only specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation preserve issues for appellate review.
More on how this was screened

Their decisions overruling litigants' objections do not overrule Smith.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

40 later cases cite Ernest Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers, Local 231, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO; 40 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Ernest Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers, Local 231, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 40 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Ernest Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers, Local 231, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace