Case Citator › Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall

Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Sixth Circuit
Citation
806 F.2d 636
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
140 of 140
Citing cases (total)
1,058
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall remains good law: all 140 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. The reviewed opinions repeatedly applied Mira's rules on specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation, discretionary appointment of habeas counsel, and notice of criminal charges.
More on how this was screened

Their nearby uses of “overruled” overwhelmingly disposed of litigants' objections in the citing cases, while the few adverse-history parentheticals concerned Nettles v. Wainwright, Spencer v. Bouchard, or other authorities rather than Mira.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

1,058 later cases cite Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall; 140 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 140 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace