In re DeLorean Motor Company
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
All 61 flagged citations have been read.
61 later cases cite In re DeLorean Motor Company; 61 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on In re DeLorean Motor Company?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Criticized
-
The district court called DeLorean's sliding scale for preliminary injunctions inscrutable.
Carter v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services · U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee · filed
And the Court believes that it should follow the latter line of cases, i.e., those that treat the standard as involving requirements rather than factors. ... This is especially true given that case-specific balancing apparently is based in part on some inscrutable sliding scale of required likelihood of success on the merits that depends on the strength of the other three factors. See, e.g., In re DeLorean Motor Co., 755 F.2d 1223, 1229 (6th Cir.1985) (“[T]he degree of likelihood of success required may depend on the strength of the other factors.”).
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads In re DeLorean Motor Company and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace