Case Citator › In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.

In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Sixth Circuit
Citation
946 F.3d 287
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
79 of 79
Citing cases (total)
163
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation remains good law: all 79 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated it. Every flagged citation was a later filing in the consolidated Ohio execution litigation reporting that the cited Sixth Circuit panel—also called Henness II—overruled the district court's earlier first-prong conclusion.
More on how this was screened

The later district-court rulings applied Henness II or distinguished its preliminary-injunction record from allegations at the pleading stage; they did not overrule, limit, or criticize the Sixth Circuit decision. One litigant's proposed bright-line reading was not adopted, and the court reaffirmed Henness II's actual holding.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

163 later cases cite In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.; 79 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 79 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace