Case Citator › James Maben v. Troy Thelen

James Maben v. Troy Thelen

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Sixth Circuit
Citation
887 F.3d 252
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
172 of 172
Citing cases (total)
673
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. James Maben v. Troy Thelen remains good law: all 172 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated it. The citing opinions applied Maben's First Amendment retaliation rules or identified Maben as the later authority that displaced older cases such as Jackson v. Madery and Ingram v. Jewell.
More on how this was screened

One court rejected an argument that Nieves v. Bartlett undermined Maben in the prison-misconduct context and continued to rely on Maben; the other nearby uses of “abrogated,” “overruled,” and similar language concerned different precedent or the disposition of a party's argument.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

673 later cases cite James Maben v. Troy Thelen; 172 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on James Maben v. Troy Thelen?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 172 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads James Maben v. Troy Thelen and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace