Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. Russell
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Texas Supreme Court later described Fort Worth Elevators as “overruled on other grounds by Wright” in Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwards. Courts continue to cite its rule on corporate liability for a vice principal's gross negligence.
42 later cases cite Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. Russell; 42 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. Russell?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in Part
-
The Texas Supreme Court disapproved Fort Worth Elevators' statement that a workers' compensation wrongful death plaintiff must obtain a jury finding on the amount of actual damages to recover exemplary damages.
Wright v. Gifford-Hill & Co., Inc. · Supreme Court of Texas · filed
In the interest of judicial economy, we disapprove that portion of Fort Worth Elevators, 123 Tex. at 150, 70 S.W.2d at 409, which states that a plaintiff must secure a jury finding as to the amount of actual damages in a wrongful death case arising under TEX.REV.STAT.ANN. art. 8306 § 5.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. Russell and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace