State v. Carpenter
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Texas Supreme Court later rejected Carpenter's language supporting a pro rata valuation of land taken when the owner claims no damage to the remainder. It continued to follow Carpenter's basic rule for compensating a partial taking. The confirmed treatment is listed below.
34 later cases cite State v. Carpenter; 34 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on State v. Carpenter?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Texas Supreme Court disapproved Carpenter's language to the extent it allowed pro rata valuation of the land taken when the owner waived damages to the remainder.
State v. Meyer · Supreme Court of Texas · filed
State v. Carpenter, supra. We have examined these authorities, and, insofar as there is language therein inconsistent with the rule of valuation announced in this opinion, it is now disapproved.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads State v. Carpenter and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace