Case Citator › Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I

Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Superseded by statute
Court
Supreme Court of Washington
Citation
23 P.3d 440
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
50 of 50
Citing cases (total)
50
Treatment dates
2014
Superseded by statute
A reviewed court treats this case as superseded by later legislation. Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I has one confirmed adverse treatment. A later Washington statute replaced the disability definition Hill used, while its other cited propositions remain good law.
More on how this was screened

That treatment is listed below. All 50 flagged citations have been read.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

50 later cases cite Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I; 50 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Superseded by statute

  • The court held that a later statutory definition of disability replaced the definition used in Hill, while Hill remained good law on the other propositions the court cited.

    Atkinson v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, Inc. · Washington Court of Appeals, Division II · filed

    McClarty, Hill v. BCTI Income Fund - , 144 Wn.2d 172, 23 P. 3d 440 ( 2001), and Davis v. ... utilize a definition of "disability" that has since been superseded by statute. RCW 49. 60. 040( 7). But these cases remain good law for the propositions for which we cite them.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace