Case Citator › Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.

Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Second Circuit
Citation
585 F.3d 58
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
80 of 80
Citing cases (total)
155
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd. remains good law: all 80 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated it. The reviewed maritime opinions enforced Jaldhi's Rule B holding, applied its retroactivity under Hawknet, Ltd. v. Overseas Shipping Agencies, or reported Jaldhi's overruling of Winter Storm and treatment of related Second Circuit precedent.
More on how this was screened

Nonmaritime opinions, including United States v. Thomas, cited Jaldhi's circuit-precedent rule while directing nearby adverse language at unrelated authorities. Distinctions applied Jaldhi within its own Rule B boundary rather than confining it further. Superseded or withdrawn opinions were excluded, and duplicate copies of the same opinion were read separately without creating entries.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

155 later cases cite Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.; 80 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 80 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace