Caiozzo v. Koreman
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Eighth Amendment standard for convicted prisoners remains distinct. All 54 flagged citations have been read; the confirmed treatment is listed below.
54 later cases cite Caiozzo v. Koreman; 54 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Caiozzo v. Koreman?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Second Circuit overruled Caiozzo's requirement that pretrial detainees and convicted prisoners meet the same deliberate indifference standard.
Darnell v. City of New York · Second Circuit · filed
Caiozzo is thus overruled to the extent that it determined that the standard for deliberate indifference is the same under the Fourteenth Amendment as it is under the Eighth Amendment.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Caiozzo v. Koreman and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace