Ross v. County of Bernalillo
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Later opinions continue to apply Ross's separate rulings about when a prisoner's grievance has exhausted available remedies.
54 later cases cite Ross v. County of Bernalillo; 54 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Ross v. County of Bernalillo?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in Part
-
The Supreme Court rejected Ross's total exhaustion rule and held that courts may proceed with exhausted prisoner claims while dismissing unexhausted claims.
Jones v. Bock · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
3 Compare Jones Bey v. Johnson, 407 F. 3d 801, 805 (CA6 2005) (re quiring dismissal of the entire action if one unexhausted claim is present); Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F. 3d 1181, 1189 (CA10 2004) (same); ... As a general matter, if a complaint contains both good and bad claims, the court proceeds with the good and leaves the bad.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Ross v. County of Bernalillo and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace