Campbell v. State
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Later decisions continued to apply Campbell's requirement that a capital sentencing order evaluate proposed mitigation in writing; their references to receding from Campbell report the earlier decision in Trease v. State.
33 later cases cite Campbell v. State; 33 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Campbell v. State?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Florida Supreme Court receded from Campbell's prohibition on assigning no weight to a mitigating factor that the evidence supports.
Trease v. State · Supreme Court of Florida · filed
We hereby recede from our opinion in Campbell to the extent it disallows trial courts from according no weight to a mitigating factor and recognize that there are circumstances where a mitigating circumstance may be found to be supported by the record, but given no weight.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Campbell v. State and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace