Kimbrough v. United States
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
All 419 flagged citations have been read.
3,379 later cases cite Kimbrough v. United States; 419 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Kimbrough v. United States?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Limited
-
The district court declined to extend Kimbrough to crack sentence reductions under § 3582(c)(2) without appellate or Supreme Court authority.
United States v. Valentine · District of Nebraska · filed
Still further, nothing in Kimbrough even hints that the Supreme Court intended to authorize judges to disregard the plain words of section 3582(c)(2). I am unwilling to extend Kimbrough and the other recent sentencing decisions of the Supreme Court to “crack” reduction cases without precedent from the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Kimbrough v. United States and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace