Erickson v. Pardus
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The 3 comments listed below did not affect the decisions: each opinion continued to apply Erickson’s liberal-construction rule and allowed an opportunity to amend. The other reviewed decisions generally applied Erickson alongside Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, or used treatment language for other authorities and issues.
34,638 later cases cite Erickson v. Pardus; 1,181 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Erickson v. Pardus?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Questioned
-
In commentary that did not affect the decision, Judge Young proposed a possible future exception to Erickson for pleadings drafted with AI while continuing to apply the existing rule.
Thornock v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · filed
While its analysis does not ultimately turn on this point, the Court notes that Plaintiff has acknowledged utilizing AI to assist in the drafting of his numerous pleadings, and it respectfully proposes that the time may be near for an exception to the Erickson liberal-construction rule, where a pro se individual relies on AI to draft pleadings and thus blurs the line between what is a good faith pro se assertion of an actionable claim and what is a computer generated morass that only serves to waste court time and resources.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener → -
In commentary that did not affect the decision, Judge Young proposed a possible future exception to Erickson for pleadings drafted with AI while continuing to apply the existing rule.
Almudhafer v. Spotsylvania Volunteer Rescue Squad · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · filed
While its analysis does not ultimately turn on this point, ... and it respectfully proposes that the time may be near for an exception to the Erickson liberal-construction rule, where a pro se individual relies on AI to draft pleadings ...
Read the full opinion on CourtListener → -
In commentary that did not affect the decision, Judge Young proposed a possible future exception to Erickson for pleadings drafted with AI while continuing to apply the existing rule.
Almudhafer v. Spotsylvania County Public Schools · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · filed
While its analysis does not ultimately turn on this point, ... and it respectfully proposes that the time may be near for an exception to the Erickson liberal-construction rule, where a pro se individual relies on AI to draft pleadings ...
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Erickson v. Pardus and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace