Blair v. Henry Filters, Inc.
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The one confirmed treatment, listed below, ended Blair's federal ADEA rule shifting the burden of persuasion to employers. The Sixth Circuit recognized this effect in Geiger v. Tower Automotive.
43 later cases cite Blair v. Henry Filters, Inc.; 43 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Blair v. Henry Filters, Inc.?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Supreme Court held that the burden of persuasion stays with ADEA plaintiffs, displacing Blair's contrary federal rule.
Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
The burden of persuasion does not shift to the employer to show that it would have taken the action regardless of age, even when a plaintiff has produced some evidence that age was one motivating factor in that decision.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Blair v. Henry Filters, Inc. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace