Wolman v. Walter
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The confirmed treatment is listed below. Mitchell v. Helms upheld a comparable aid program; Wolman's separate approvals of textbooks, testing, and other services were not the part displaced.
13 later cases cite Wolman v. Walter; 13 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Wolman v. Walter?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in Part
-
The Supreme Court upheld aid supplying secular instructional materials and equipment to religious schools, displacing Wolman's contrary prohibition; four Justices expressly called for overruling Wolman to that extent.
Mitchell v. Helms · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
Accordingly, we hold that Chapter 2 is not a law respecting an establishment of religion. Jefferson Parish need not exclude religious schools from its Chapter 2 program.19 To the extent that Meek and Wolman conflict with this holding, we overrule them.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Wolman v. Walter and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace