Manson v. Brathwaite
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Massachusetts, Wisconsin, and New Jersey separately chose stricter identification rules under their state constitutions.
5,074 later cases cite Manson v. Brathwaite; 105 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Manson v. Brathwaite?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Questioned
-
The Alaska Court of Appeals questioned whether Manson's reliability analysis remains a valid way to assess photographic identifications in light of later scientific research, but did not decide the issue because any suggestiveness was harmless.
Tegoseak v. State · Alaska Court of Appeals · filed
In addition, we are aware that scientific research conducted during the past thirty years has cast doubt on the analysis set forth in Manson v. Brath-waite-raising questions as to whether that analysis is a valid method for ascertaining whether a photographic lineup has yielded a reliable identification.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Manson v. Brathwaite and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace