Giglio v. United States
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Sixth Circuit held that a proven false-testimony violation can still be harmless under the separate standard for federal habeas relief. That treatment is listed below. Other citing opinions applied Giglio's disclosure and materiality rules or found their conditions unmet.
6,848 later cases cite Giglio v. United States; 298 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Giglio v. United States?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Limited
-
The Sixth Circuit held that a Giglio false-testimony violation can be harmless on federal habeas review even when the false testimony satisfies Giglio's materiality test.
Rosencrantz v. Lafler · Sixth Circuit · filed
courts may excuse Brady/Giglio violations involving known and materially false statements as harmless error.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Giglio v. United States and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace