Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Baldridge
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The confirmed treatment is listed below. All 17 flagged citations have been read; later courts mostly reported the Supreme Court's overruling.
17 later cases cite Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Baldridge; 17 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Baldridge?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled
-
The Supreme Court expressly overruled Liggett's decision striking down a pharmacist ownership requirement under the Due Process Clause.
North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
The Liggett case, being a derelict in the stream of the law, is hereby overruled. We reverse and remand the judgment below and free the courts and agencies of North Dakota from what the State Supreme Court deemed to be the mandate of Liggett.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Baldridge and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace