Ribnik v. McBride
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Supreme Court later described Ribnik as “overruled unanimously” in Olsen. All 11 flagged citations have been read. The Constitution Annotated lists Olsen as the overruling decision.
11 citations to Ribnik v. McBride sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Ribnik v. McBride?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled
-
The Supreme Court held that Ribnik's due process ban on regulating private employment agency fees no longer controlled.
Olsen v. Nebraska ex rel. Western Reference & Bond Assn., Inc. · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
The drift away from Ribnik v. McBride, supra, has been so great that it can no longer be deemed a controlling authority.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Ribnik v. McBride and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace