Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065

Section 14.065 requires personal service on a foreign corporation through its president, other head, secretary, cashier, managing agent, or resident agent.

Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Second Judicial District Court · filed 1971-01-26(1)(a)

This means that a foreign corporation, not qualified to do business in Nevada, but alleged to have transacted business here, may be served with process under NRS 14.065 by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint in the foreign jurisdiction to the president or other head of the corporation, secretary, cashier, managing agent, or resident agent thereof.

Section 14.065 provides a basis for serving process on defendants outside Nevada.

Franklin v. Bartsas Realty, Inc. · filed 1979-08-21

This contention, not raised below, is meritless. Process was served in accordance with Nevada’s long-arm statute NRS 14.065, and thus is governed by NRCP 4(e)(3), and was therefore valid.

Section 14.065 permits service on an out-of-state defendant by leaving the summons and complaint with a suitable person at the defendant’s usual place of abode when that method is permitted for a like in-state person.

Orme v. Eighth Judicial District Court · filed 1989-11-27(1)(a)

Thus, petitioner argues, delivery of the papers to Kahn’s wife constituted effective personal service of process under NRS 14.065 becáuse the papers were served by the method provided in NRCP 4(d)(6) for service upon a person of like kind within this state. We agree.

Section 14.065 requires personal service on an out-of-state defendant; service by mail is ineffective even if the defendant receives notice.

Campbell v. Gasper · filed 1984-05-18

Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, prescribes that personal service shall suffice, the service to be made by delivering a copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint, to the party served. ... Where the State statute is specific that personal service is required on a defendant who resides outside Nevada, a substituted form of service is ineffective. ... Since the insufficiency of service on Defendant has left this Court without personal jurisdiction over him, the default entered against him on October 6, 1983, must be vacated.

Section 14.065 does not authorize service on a foreign corporation through its domestic subsidiary.

Patel v. Pal USA, INC · filed 2024-12-03

Nevada’s long-arm statute does not have a similar provision. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065. Patel must thus comply with the international requirements for serving Paltronics in Australia under Rule 4(f)(1).

Section 14.065 reaches the limits of federal due process, but does not confer personal jurisdiction over a nonresident whose activities and the claim lack sufficient ties to Nevada.

Whitted v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (Ocers) · filed 1992-06-26

The Nevada Supreme Court has interpreted Nevada's long-arm statute to reach the limits of federal constitutional due process. Judas Priest v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., 104 Nev. 424, 426, 760 P.2d 137, 138, (1988).1 ... Here, Whitted has not shown that OCERS engaged in any affirmative activities or transactions within Nevada which would show that OCERS purposefully availed itself of the forum-state, Nevada. See id. at 851. Nor has Whitted shown that her action against OCERS arises out of its contacts with Nevada. See id. at 853. Given these circumstances, exercise of personal jurisdiction against OCERS in Nevada is not reasonable. See id. at 854.

Section 14.065 allows Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Baker v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada · filed 2000-06-05

Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, reaches the limits of due process set by the United States Constitution.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by the United States Constitution.

Leonard v. Optimal Payments Ltd. (In Re National Audit Defense Network) · filed 2005-06-23

Nevada’s long-arm statute permits the exercise of jurisdiction to the same extent as the United States Constitution.

Section 14.065 reaches the limits of due process and permits specific personal jurisdiction over an insurer whose policy covers Nevada accidents when the claim arises from a Nevada accident and requiring the insurer to defend there is reasonable.

Arbella Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dist. Ct. · filed 2006-05-25

First, "Nevada's long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, reaches the limits of due process set by the United States Constitution." ... For the reasons discussed above, we conclude that Arbella purposefully availed itself of the Nevada forum by way of its policy's territory clause. Moreover, the fact that the accident occurred in Nevada, where the Mendeses resided and continue to reside, coupled with Arbella's territory clause, make personal jurisdiction in a Nevada forum reasonable.

Section 14.065 reaches the limits of federal due process and permits specific personal jurisdiction over an insurer whose policy covers accidents in Nevada when the claim arises from that coverage and exercising jurisdiction is reasonable.

Arbella Mutual Insurance v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark · filed 2006-05-25

First, “Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, reaches the limits of due process set by the United States Constitution.” ... We agree with the reasoning set forth in Rossman and Portage La Prairie and conclude that Arbella purposefully availed itself of Nevada’s forum when it contracted with the Mendeses to provide coverage in Nevada.

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by the United States Constitution.

Patent Rights Protection Group, LLC v. Video Gaming Technologies, Inc. · filed 2010-05-10

Here, the district court correctly noted that the relevant long-arm statute, Nevada Revised Statute § 14.065, permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over a party to the extent permitted by the United States Constitution.

Section 14.065(1) extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of the state and federal constitutions.

WMCV PHASE 3, LLC v. Shushok & McCoy, Inc. · filed 2010-10-05(1)

Because Nevada’s long arm statute by its terms extends personal jurisdiction over defendants to the limits of the state and federal constitutions, see Nev.Rev.Stat. § 14.065(1), and because the Nevada Constitution does not appear to impose any restrictions on the exercise of personal jurisdiction beyond those imposed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Nev. Const, art. 1, § 8, cl. 5, the test in Nevada is essentially a one-step test under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see U.S. Const, amend. XIV § 1.

Section 14.065 authorizes personal jurisdiction to the extent federal due process permits.

Pfister v. Selling Source, LLC · filed 2013-03-20

Nevada’s long-arm statute authorizes the exercise of personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process. Rio Props., Inc. v. Rio Int’l Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007, 1019 (9th Cir.2002) (citing Nev. Rev.Stat. § 14.065 (2001)).

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant to the extent allowed by due process.

FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP VS. DIST. CT. (VERANO LAND GRP., LP) · filed 2015-02-05

Because Nevada's long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, permits personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant unless the exercise of jurisdiction would violate due process, our inquiry in this writ petition is confined to whether the exercise of jurisdiction over Fulbright & Jaworski and Macon comports with due process.

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction over a nonresident as far as constitutional due process allows; without sufficient Nevada contacts, jurisdiction is unavailable.

Catholic Diocese, Green Bay v. John Doe 119 · filed 2015-05-28

Because Nevada's long-arm statute is coterminous with the limits of constitutional due process, Arbella Mut. Ins., 122 Nev. at 512, 134 P.3d at 712; see NRS 14.065, these two requirements are the same.

Section 14.065 reaches the limits of due process and permits specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident investment trust adviser when a suit arises from that role.

DAVIS VS. DIST. CT. (DAVIS) C/W 68542 · filed 2017-05-25

Accepting a role as an ITA manifests a defendant's purposeful availment of the privilege of acting in Nevada; where, as here, a suit arises out of a nonresident defendant's role as an ITA, the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction would satisfy the requirements of Nevada's long-arm statute, as well as traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.

Section 14.065 requires sufficient Nevada contacts for specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant; merely holding legal title to shares of a Nevada corporation does not suffice.

Harris v. the Depository Tr. & Clearing Co. · filed 2018-02-15

requirements of Nevada's long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, have been satisfied and that the exercise of jurisdiction does not abridge due process. ... This shareholder contact does not suffice to establish minimum contacts.

Section 14.065 authorizes Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction on any basis consistent with the U.S. Constitution.

Prescott ex rel. Situated v. Slide Fire Solutions, LP · filed 2018-09-17

Nevada has authorized its courts to exercise jurisdiction over persons "on any basis not inconsistent with ... the Constitution of the United States." Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065.

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by federal due process.

H.E.B., LLC v. Jackson Walker, L.L.P. · filed 2019-04-05

Nevada's long-arm statute encompasses the full extent of federal due process; thus, "our inquiry [here] is confined to whether the exercise of jurisdiction over [respondents] comports with due process." Id. ... Accordingly, because we conclude that HEB has failed to make a prima facie showing of either general or specific personal jurisdiction over respondents, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting respondents' motion to dismiss.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction on any basis consistent with the Nevada and United States Constitutions, so courts apply the federal personal jurisdiction standard.

Gunn v. Hans-Peter Wild · filed 2019-05-30

Because Nevada’s jurisdictional statute allows for personal jurisdiction “over a party to a civil action on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States[,]” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065, we apply the federal standard for personal jurisdiction, see Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277, 283 (2014).

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Klein v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · filed 2019-08-21(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with federal standards, so a court may exercise personal jurisdiction if doing so comports with federal constitutional due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits permitted by federal due process.

Harris v. Dzurenda · filed 2019-09-09

Because “Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the limits of due process set by the United States Constitution,” the Court moves on to the second part of the analysis.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the full extent permitted by due process.

Chamani v. Quasar Mining Group Inc. · filed 2020-05-18

However, Nevada’s “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the court need only address federal due process standards.

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Krogstad v. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. · filed 2020-08-03(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with federal standards, so I may exercise personal jurisdiction if doing so comports with federal constitutional due process.

Section 14.065 authorizes Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent permitted by the United States Constitution.

Brown v. Liberty County Mutual Insurance Company · filed 2020-09-20

Nevada has authorized its courts to exercise jurisdiction over persons “on any basis not inconsistent with . . . the Constitution of the United States.” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065. Thus, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the relevant constraint on Nevada’s authority to bind a nonresident defendant to a judgment of its courts.

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Edwards v. Juan Martinez, Inc. · filed 2020-09-22

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the “outer limits of federal constitutional due process,” the Court need only analyze whether exercising specific jurisdiction over Cole and Eggleston comports with due process.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the fullest extent allowed by due process.

JoshCo Tech, LLC v. Does 1-4, the owners and operators of vradvisors.org · filed 2020-10-26

Because Nevada’s “long-arm” statute provides for personal jurisdiction to the fullest extent of the due process clause, the court need only apply federal due process standards.

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction to the limits of state and federal constitutional due process.

Graziose v. American Home Products Corp. · filed 2001-09-18(1)

Nevada’s “long-arm statute” allows jurisdiction of Nevada courts “over a party to a civil action on any basis non inconsistent with the constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States.” NRS 14.065(1). The statute has been “liberally construed to reach the outer limits of federal constitutional due process.”

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by the Constitution.

Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink · filed 2002-03-20

Nevada’s long-arm statute permits the exercise of jurisdiction to the same extent as the Constitution.

Section 14.065(1) limits Nevada’s extraterritorial personal jurisdiction to what both the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions permit.

Corbello v. DeVito · filed 2012-01-31(1)

Nevada’s long-arm rule restricts extraterritorial jurisdiction to the limits of both the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions. See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 14.065(1).

Section 14.065(1) extends personal jurisdiction to the limits of the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions.

Waterfall Homeowners Ass'n v. Viega, Inc. · filed 2012-07-10(1)

Nevada’s long-arm rule restricts extra-territorial jurisdiction to the limits of both the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions. See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 14.065(1).

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the limits of state and federal due process.

Evanston Insurance v. Western Community Insurance · filed 2014-03-31(1)

Because Nevada's long-arm statute is co-extensive with the limits of due process, the inquiry into the propriety of personal jurisdiction under Nevada law and the inquiry into the limits of due process collapse into a single inquiry. Nev.Rev.Stat. § 14.065(1) ("A court of this state may exercise jurisdiction over a party to a civil action on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States.").

NRS 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction over a nonresident to the limits of Fourteenth Amendment due process.

Viega GmbH v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. · filed 2014-05-29

Nevada's long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, reaches the constitutional limits of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, which requires that the defendant have such minimum contacts with the state that the defendant could reasonably anticipate being haled into court here, thereby complying with "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice." Arbella, 122 Nev. at 512, 134 P.3d at 712 (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Intl Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945)).

Section 14.065(1) extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of the federal and Nevada constitutions.

Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. Beckhoff Automation, LLC · filed 2014-05-30(1)

Nevada’s long-arm rule restricts extra-territorial jurisdiction to the limits of both the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions. See Nev.Rev. Stat. § 14.065(1).

Section 14.065(1) extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions; Nevada due process is coextensive with federal due process.

Southport Lane Equity II, LLC v. Downey · filed 2016-04-01(1)

Technically, Nevada’s long-arm statute restricts extra-territorial jurisdiction to the limits of both the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions. ... In summary, the exercisé of personal jurisdiction in Nevada need only comport with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction over a nonresident only when exercising it complies with due process.

Benford, Iii Vs. Jones-Benford · filed 2019-09-26(1)

Nevada's long-arm statute permits a district court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant "unless the exercise of jurisdiction would violate due process?' Consipio Holding, BV v. Carlberg, 128 Nev. 454, 458, 282 P.3d 751, 754 (2012) (citing NRS 14.065(1)). ... We therefore conclude that Pamela failed to demonstrate that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over Lebow comports with due process.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by the Nevada and United States Constitutions.

Ponder v. Wild · filed 2019-09-30

Because “Nevada’s jurisdictional statute allows for personal jurisdiction ‘over a party to a civil action on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States[,]’ Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065, [I] apply the federal standard for personal jurisdiction.”

Section 14.065 allows personal jurisdiction to the limits of the U.S. Constitution, making the state law and federal due process analyses identical.

Cooper v. Shoei Safety Helmet Corporation · filed 2020-03-26

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute grants courts jurisdiction over persons “on any basis not inconsistent with” the U.S. Constitution, the jurisdictional analyses under state law and federal due process are identical.

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction as far as due process permits, making due process the controlling inquiry for a nonresident defendant.

Urbanski v. National Football League C/W 61732 · filed 2015-01-08

Nevada's long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, extends to the outer reaches of due process, therefore this seemingly two,step analysis is collapsed into a single inquiry regarding whether a court's exercise of jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant would offend due process.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant unless exercising jurisdiction would violate due process.

Fulbright & Jaworski v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. · filed 2015-02-05

Because Nevada's long-arm statute, NEW 14.065, permits personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant unless the exercise of jurisdiction would violate due process, our inquiry in this writ petition is confined to whether the exercise of jurisdiction over Fulbright & Jaworski and Macon comports with due process.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by the U.S. Constitution, so the state-law and federal due-process analyses are identical.

Arik v. Meyers · filed 2020-07-24

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute grants courts jurisdiction over persons “on any basis not inconsistent with” the U.S. Constitution, the jurisdictional analyses under state law and federal due process are identical.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

JoshCo Tech, LLC v. Does 1-4, the owners and operators of vradvisors.org · filed 2020-10-02

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the “outer limits of federal constitutional due process,” the Court need only analyze whether exercising personal jurisdiction over Ms. White comports with due process.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by due process.

Cenegenics, LLC v. Gaines · filed 2020-06-12

However, Nevada’s “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the court need only address federal due process standards.

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by the U.S. Constitution, making the state-law and federal due-process inquiries identical.

Wang v. Korean Airlines Co., Ltd. · filed 2021-01-08

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute grants courts jurisdiction over persons “on any basis not inconsistent with” the U.S. Constitution, the jurisdictional analyses under state law and federal due process are identical.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process, so courts need only apply the constitutional test.

Casanova v. Morrow Jr · filed 2021-02-22

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 authorizes personal jurisdiction to the extent permitted by the United States Constitution.

Brown v. Liberty County Mutual Insurance Company · filed 2021-07-13

Nevada has authorized its courts to exercise jurisdiction over persons “on any basis not inconsistent with . . . the Constitution of the United States.” NRS 14.065. Thus, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the relevant constraint on Nevada’s authority to bind a nonresident defendant to a judgment of its own courts.

Section 14.065 makes Nevada’s personal-jurisdiction analysis identical to the federal due-process analysis, which requires minimum contacts with Nevada.

My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Jackson · filed 2021-08-06

The jurisdictional analyses under state ... law and federal due process are identical in Nevada,38 requiring “minimum contacts with [the ... state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and ... substantial justice.’”

Section 14.065 authorizes Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction on any basis consistent with the U.S. Constitution.

Sessa v. Ancestry.com Operations Inc. · filed 2021-09-16

Nevada has authorized its courts to exercise jurisdiction over persons “on any basis not inconsistent with . . . the Constitution of the United States.” NRS 14.065.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits allowed by federal due process.

CMB Infrastructure Group IX, LP v. Cobra Energy Investment Finance, Inc. · filed 2021-11-15

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the constitutional zenith,35 the question here is whether jurisdiction “comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”...

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits allowed by federal due process.

Nguyen v. Margines · filed 2021-12-03

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the constitutional zenith,11 the question here is whether jurisdiction “comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”12 ... Because this court plainly lacks jurisdiction over the defendants, I dismiss the complaint without prejudice for want of personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Mina De Oro, LLC v. Goettsche · filed 2022-03-28

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065; Galatz v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 683 P.2d 26, 28 (Nev. 1984).

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants to the full extent allowed by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

Choo v. Dist. Ct. (Streamline Media Group, Inc.) · filed 2022-08-11

Pursuant to Nevada’s long- arm statute, NRS 14.065, personal “[j]urisdiction over a nonresident defendant is proper” to the full extent permitted by the Due Process Clause “under the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction in Nevada to the full extent permitted by due process.

Signature Auto Group, Inc. v. REV Recreation Group, Inc. · filed 2022-09-29

However, Nevada’s “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the court need only address federal due process standards.

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Dydzak v. Cantil-Sakauye · filed 2022-10-07(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute permits the exercise of jurisdiction on any basis consistent with federal due process. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065(1). ... Dydzak therefore has not made a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction over any of the moving defendants.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the full extent permitted by due process.

Bakewell v. Streaming Solutions LLC · filed 2022-12-21

However, Nevada’s “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the court need only address federal due process standards.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Hofbruhaus of America. LLC v. Oak Tree Management Services, Inc. · filed 2023-01-03

Because “Nevada's long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the limits of due process set by the United States Constitution,” see Baker v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct. ex rel. Cty. of Clark, 999 P.2d 1020, 1023 (Nev. 2000), a Court simply analyzes whether “the exercise of jurisdiction must comport with federal due process” see Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc, 39 F.3d 1392, 1404–05.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by due process.

Nevada Corporate Headquarters, Inc. v. Sellers Playbook, Inc. · filed 2023-04-05

However, Nevada’s “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the court need only address federal due process standards.

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by due process.

Wealthy Inc. v. Cornelia · filed 2023-07-27

However, Nevada’s “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the court need only address federal due process standards.

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Community Schools Initiative v. Vanguard Field Strategies, LLC · filed 2024-01-17(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with federal standards, so I may exercise personal jurisdiction if doing so comports with federal constitutional due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Brennan v. Cadwell Sanford Deibert & Garry LLP · filed 2021-02-02

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the constitutional ceiling,15 the question here is whether jurisdiction “comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by federal due process.

China Auto Logistics, Inc. v. DLA Piper, LLP · filed 2021-03-03

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

St. Clair v. iEnergizer, Inc. · filed 2021-07-21

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065; Galatz v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 100 Nev. 408, 683 P.2d 26, 28 (Nev. 1984).

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Nguyen v. Islamic Republic of Iran · filed 2021-09-13

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the full extent permitted by due process.

Blitz NV, LLC v. Interactive Games Technologies Inc. · filed 2022-09-30

However, Nevada’s “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the court need only address federal due process standards.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

PlayUp, Inc. v. Mintas · filed 2023-02-13

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Entourage Investment Group, LLC v. TV4 Entertainment, Inc. · filed 2023-02-15

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits permitted by federal due process.

Gonzalez-Pozo v. Empire Fire And Marine Insurance Company · filed 2023-11-22

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process, which requires sufficient contacts with Nevada.

My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Lituski · filed 2021-08-06

The jurisdictional analyses under state ... law and federal due process are identical in Nevada,38 requiring “minimum contacts with [the ... state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and ... substantial justice.’”

Section 14.065 permits specific jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant only when the defendant’s Nevada contacts satisfy federal due process.

My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Donnell · filed 2021-08-06

The jurisdictional analyses under state ... law and federal due process are identical in Nevada,38 requiring “minimum contacts with [the ... state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and ... substantial justice.’”

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process, which requires minimum contacts with Nevada.

My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Butler · filed 2021-08-06

The jurisdictional analyses under state ... law and federal due process are identical in Nevada,38 requiring “minimum contacts with [the state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’”

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Hix v. Biomet Inc · filed 2022-03-29

Nevada’s long-arm statute, Nev. Rev. Stat. §14.065, grants jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants if the cause of action arises from certain enumerated acts, including transaction of business or tortious conduct within the state. ... If the exercise of personal jurisdiction is consistent with federal due process, it also comports with Nevada’s long-arm statute.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Neumann v. Red Rock 4-Wheelers, Inc. · filed 2022-08-15

Since Nevada's long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the limits of due process set by the United States Constitution, the Court analyzes whether exercising jurisdiction comports with federal due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process, requiring sufficient minimum contacts with the state.

My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Lambert · filed 2021-08-06

The jurisdictional analyses under state ... law and federal due process are identical in Nevada,38 requiring “minimum contacts with [the ... state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and ... substantial justice.’”...

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process, making the state and federal jurisdictional analyses identical.

Vanguard Dealer Services, LLC v. Cervantes · filed 2022-07-22

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute grants courts ... jurisdiction over persons “on any basis not inconsistent with” the U.S. Constitution, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065, the jurisdictional analyses under state law and federal due process are identical.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits permitted by federal due process.

Quantum Energy Inc. v. PCS Advisors LLC · filed 2023-01-23

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the constitutional zenith,10 the question is whether jurisdiction ... “comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the limits of state and federal due process.

Mona v. Sifen · filed 2023-04-17(1)

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute is “co-extensive with the limits of due process, the inquiry into the propriety of personal jurisdiction under Nevada law and the inquiry into the limits of due process collapse into a single inquiry.” Evanston Ins. Co. v. W. Comm. Ins. Co., 13 F. Supp. 3d 1064, 1068 (D. Nev. 2014) (citing NRS § 14.065(1) (“A court of this state may exercise jurisdiction over a party to a civil action on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States.”)).

Section 14.065 extends Nevada courts’ personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Naessens v. Breslin · filed 2023-06-12

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the constitutional zenith,4 the question is whether jurisdiction “comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by the United States Constitution.

Talentscale, Inc. v. Aery Aviation, LLC · filed 2023-08-01

By statute, “Nevada has authorized its courts to exercise jurisdiction over persons ‘on any basis not inconsistent with . . . the Constitution of the United States.’” Walden, 571 U.S. at 283 (quoting Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065). So the jurisdictional analyses under state and federal law are the same.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Lebsock v. General Motors · filed 2023-10-26

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the constitutional zenith,7 the question is whether jurisdiction “comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”8 ... So, because Lebsock has not satisfied his burden to show that this court has personal jurisdiction over Barra and Juechter, I dismiss the claims against them for lack of jurisdiction.

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Sam and Ash, LLP v. The Sam Bernstein Law Firm, PLLC · filed 2025-05-28

Because Nevada allows its courts to exercise jurisdiction “on any basis not inconsistent with . . . the Constitution of the United States,”11 a jurisdictional analysis “ask[s] whether the exercise of jurisdiction comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction only on a basis consistent with the state and federal constitutions; specific jurisdiction requires claim-related minimum contacts and a fair, reasonable exercise of jurisdiction.

IN RE: GOLDSTEIN IRREVOCABLE TRUST · filed 2025-08-28(1)

"A court of this state may exercise jurisdiction over a party to a civil action on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States." NRS 14.065(1). ... Specific jurisdiction requires that the conduct giving rise to the claim establish the necessary minimum contacts with the state to make the exercise of jurisdiction fair and reasonable.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada courts’ personal jurisdiction to the full extent permitted by due process.

Paradise Entertainment Limited v. Empire Technological Group Limited · filed 2025-10-17

However, Nevada's “long-arm” statute applies to the full extent permitted by the due process clause, so the inquiry is the same, and the ... court need only address federal due process standards. See Arbella Mut. Ins. Co. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 122 Nev. 509, 134 P.3d 710, 712 (Nev. 2006) (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065); see also Boschetto, 539 F.3d at 1015.

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction consistent with the state and federal constitutions; a platform’s Nevada-directed marketing and data collection can establish purposeful direction.

TIKTOK, INC. v. DIST. CT. (STATE OF NEV.) (CIVIL) · filed 2025-11-06(1)

"A court of this state may exercise jurisdiction over a party to a civil action on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States." NRS 14.065(1). ... We agree with the analysis in Briskin, which supports that the State made a prirna facie showing that TikTok expressly aimed its conduct at Nevada based on the facts shown.

Section 14.065 reaches the limits of federal due process when a court assesses specific personal jurisdiction.

Javaheri v. United States · filed 2024-05-09

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the “outer limits of federal constitutional due process,” the Court need only analyze whether exercising specific jurisdiction over Defendants comports with due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Akerman v. Kerner · filed 2024-10-08

Nevada’s long-arm statute is coextensive with the requirements of federal due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Dinaali v. Interlaced Social LLC · filed 2024-11-13

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the “outer limits of federal constitutional due process,” the Court need only analyze whether exercising specific jurisdiction over Defendants comports with due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Albury III v. Strategic Staffing Solutions · filed 2024-11-23

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the “outer limits of federal constitutional due process,” the Court need only analyze whether exercising specific jurisdiction over defendants comports with due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the full extent permitted by federal due process.

Smith II v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC · filed 2025-01-27

Where a state, such as Nevada, has a “long-arm” statute providing state “court’s jurisdiction to the fullest extent permitted by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a court need only address federal due process standards.” Id. citing Arbella Mut. Ins. Co. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 122 Nev. 509, 134 P.3d 710, 712 (2006) (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065); Boschetto, 539 F.3d at 1015. ... Thus, as pleaded, Plaintiff fails to state a basis for the Court to exercise personal jurisdiction over any of the Defendants and, for this independent reason, Plaintiff’s claims cannot proceed.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process, so courts need only assess due process when deciding jurisdiction.

App-Order LLC v. Reynolds · filed 2025-03-07

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Gerwaski v. State of Nevada · filed 2025-05-05(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with federal standards, so I may exercise personal jurisdiction if doing so comports with federal constitutional due process.

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process, so Nevada courts assess due process when determining jurisdiction.

Admiral Insurance Company v. Kabul, Inc. · filed 2025-07-03

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065; Galatz v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 683 P.2d 26, 28 (Nev. 1984).

Section 14.065 reaches the limits of federal due process, so specific personal jurisdiction depends on whether exercising it satisfies due process.

Karen v. United Services Automobile Association · filed 2025-07-22

“Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the ‘outer limits of federal constitutional due process,’” the court need only analyze whether exercising specific jurisdiction over AIS/CCC comports with due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Desormeaux v. Auto Rental, LLC · filed 2025-07-28

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the “outer limits of federal constitutional due process,” the Court need only analyze whether exercising specific jurisdiction over a defendant comports with due process.

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Sternberg v. Warneck · filed 2024-07-03(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute permits the exercise of jurisdiction on any basis consistent with federal due process. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.065(1).

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

Dinaali v. Interlaced Social LLC · filed 2024-08-19

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS § 14.065, reaches the “outer limits of federal constitutional due process,” the Court need only analyze whether exercising specific jurisdiction over Defendants comports with due process.

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Sternberg v. Warneck · filed 2024-11-14(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute permits the exercise of jurisdiction on any basis consistent with federal due process.

Section 14.065(1) permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by federal due process.

Exom v. Brock & Scott, PLLC · filed 2025-01-23(1)

Nevada’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with federal standards, so I may exercise personal jurisdiction if doing so comports with federal constitutional due process.

Section 14.065 extends Nevada personal jurisdiction to the limits of federal due process.

EBET, Inc. v. Aspire Global International Limited · filed 2025-01-31

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the outer limits of federal constitutional due process, courts in Nevada need only assess constitutional principles of due process when determining personal jurisdiction.

Section 14.065(1) extends Nevada’s personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants to the limits of constitutional due process.

FRANCESCHI v. LG CHEM, LTD. · filed 2025-12-18(1)

Personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant must be consistent with Nevada's long-arm statute and comport with principles of due process. ... "Because Nevada's long-arm statute is coterminous with the limits of constitutional due process, these two requirements are the same." ... see NRS 14.065(1).

Section 14.065 permits personal jurisdiction to the full extent allowed by federal due process.

Boxabl, Inc. v. Brave Control Solutions Inc. · filed 2025-10-14

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute reaches the constitutional zenith,22 the question is whether jurisdiction “comports with the limits imposed by federal due process.”

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the extent allowed by the Constitution.

Wood · filed 2025-11-26

Because Nevada's long-arm statute permits the exercise of jurisdiction to the same extent as the Constitution, it is sufficient to show that the exercise of personal jurisdiction would comply with due process. Nev.Rev.Stat. § 14.065 (2001); see id.

Under the pre-1993 version of § 14.065, transacting business in Nevada did not require business activity to be localized in the state.

Hoag v. Sweetwater International · filed 1994-07-01

Defendants’ contention that any business transacted in the state must be “localized” in order to be considered a sufficient contact for the exercise of personal jurisdiction under Nev.Rev.Stat. § 14.065 is misplaced. ... Nevada courts have not placed such a limitation on the definition of “transacting business” when interpreting Nev.Rev.Stat. § 14.065.

Section 14.065 permits a corporation’s Nevada contacts to be attributed to a successor corporation for personal jurisdiction when the entities lack independence and attribution is fair.

Videotronics, Inc. v. Bend Electronics · filed 1983-06-06

For the purposes of determining whether in personam jurisdiction may be obtained over VHI under Nevada’s “long-arm” statute, NRS 14.065, the Court finds that it has been shown by a preponderance of the evidence that there is no independence between VO and VHI, and that VHI was created in order to continue and expand the activity formerly engaged in by VO. In this connection the Court further finds that traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice are not violated by attributing conduct in the State of Nevada by VO to VHI under these circumstances for the purposes of establishing personal jurisdiction over VHI.

Section 14.065 permits Nevada courts to exercise personal jurisdiction to the limits of constitutional due process.

Casentini v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada · filed 1994-07-07

Nevada has construed its long arm statute “to be broad enough to reach the outer limits of federal constitutional due process.” Levinson v. District Court, 103 Nev. 404, 406, 742 P.2d 1024, 1025 (1987).

Section 14.065 extends personal jurisdiction as far as due process permits, allowing jurisdiction over a vendor for a dispute arising from contracts it made at a Nevada trade show.

Firouzabadi v. First Judicial District Court · filed 1994-11-30

Because Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS 14.065, “has been construed to extend to the outer reaches of due process, the two inquiries . . . may be collapsed into one.” ... Accordingly, UAC exposed itself to Nevada jurisdiction over a dispute on the contract that it entered into with petitioners at the trade show, as the entire purpose of UAC’s presence in Nevada was to negotiate such transactions.

Section 14.065(1) extends personal jurisdiction to the limits of due process, so the fiduciary shield doctrine does not apply.

Consipio Holding, BV v. Carlberg · filed 2012-08-09(1)

Because the Nevada long-arm statute extends jurisdiction to the limits of due process, we agree that the fiduciary shield doctrine does not apply.

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction based on a conspiracy when co-conspirators have sufficient contacts with Nevada and could reasonably expect their actions to have consequences there.

TRICARICHI VS. COÖPERATIEVE RABOBANK, U.A. · filed 2019-05-02(1)

We conclude that Nevada's long-arm statute encompasses a conspiracy theory of personal jurisdiction. See NRS 14.065(1) (personal jurisdiction is proper "on any basis not inconsistent with" the Nevada or United States Constitutions).

Section 14.065(1) permits personal jurisdiction based on a conspiracy when the required Nevada contacts and reasonable expectation of consequences in Nevada are shown.

Tricarichi v. Cooperative Rabobank, U.A. · filed 2019-05-02(1)

We conclude that Nevada's long-arm statute encompasses a conspiracy theory of personal jurisdiction.