Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint - South Carolina
UNINSURED / UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COMPLAINT
Table of Contents
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- General Allegations
- Policy Identification and Coverage
- UM vs. UIM Status
- First Cause of Action — Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)
- Second Cause of Action — Bad Faith Refusal to Pay
- Damages
- Stacking of Coverage
- Prayer for Relief
- Verification
Caption
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
[JUDICIAL CIRCUIT] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
| [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], | Case No.: [________________________________] |
| Plaintiff, | |
| vs. | SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT |
| [TORTFEASOR NAME] and [INSURANCE COMPANY NAME], | (Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist) |
| Defendants. |
Parties
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] ("Plaintiff") is a citizen and resident of [COUNTY] County, South Carolina, and is an insured under the automobile insurance policy described herein.
-
Defendant [TORTFEASOR NAME] ("Defendant Motorist") is, upon information and belief, an individual who [☐ resides in [COUNTY] County, South Carolina / ☐ whose address is unknown].
-
Defendant [INSURANCE COMPANY NAME] ("Defendant Insurer") is an insurance company authorized to transact business in the State of South Carolina, with its principal place of business at [INSURER ADDRESS], and is named as a party defendant pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-150 and/or § 38-77-160.
Jurisdiction and Venue
-
The Court of Common Pleas is the civil division of the Circuit Court. Under S.C. Const. art. V, § 11, the Circuit Court is a general trial court with original civil jurisdiction except where exclusive jurisdiction is assigned to an inferior court. Plaintiff must confirm that no case-specific exclusive-jurisdiction rule applies.
-
Venue is alleged to be proper in [COUNTY] County under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-7-30 because [IDENTIFY EACH DEFENDANT'S TYPE AND THE APPLICABLE SUBSECTION; STATE WHERE THE MOTORIST RESIDED OR THE INSURER HAD ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS WHEN THE CLAIM AROSE, AND/OR WHERE THE MOST SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE ALLEGED ACT OR OMISSION OCCURRED]. Transacting business in the county, standing alone, does not establish an insurer's principal place of business under subsection (H).
-
Plaintiff claims damages of $[________________] or an amount to be determined by the factfinder. S.C. Code Ann. § 22-3-10(2) gives magistrates concurrent jurisdiction over specified personal- or property-injury damages actions when the damages claimed do not exceed $7,500; that ceiling is not a minimum amount-in-controversy requirement for the Court of Common Pleas.
General Allegations
-
On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was [☐ operating / ☐ a passenger in] a motor vehicle on [STREET/HIGHWAY], in [CITY], [COUNTY] County, South Carolina.
-
At said time and place, the Defendant Motorist negligently, recklessly, willfully, and/or wantonly operated a motor vehicle, causing a collision with Plaintiff's vehicle.
-
The Defendant Motorist's negligent, reckless, willful, and/or wanton acts include but are not limited to:
☐ Failure to maintain a safe speed
☐ Failure to yield the right of way
☐ Failure to maintain a proper lookout
☐ Following too closely
☐ Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs
☐ Running a red light or stop sign
☐ Improper lane change
☐ Other: [________________________________]
- As a direct and proximate result of the collision, Plaintiff sustained serious bodily injuries, incurred medical expenses, lost wages, and experienced pain and suffering.
Policy Identification and Coverage
-
At the time of the accident, Plaintiff was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Defendant Insurer, Policy No. [POLICY NUMBER], effective from [POLICY START DATE] to [POLICY END DATE] (the "Policy").
-
The Policy provides uninsured motorist ("UM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident.
-
The Policy provides underinsured motorist ("UIM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UIM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UIM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident.
-
Plaintiff has paid all premiums due under the Policy and has complied with all conditions precedent.
-
Plaintiff did not execute a valid written rejection or selection of lower UM/UIM coverage limits on the form prescribed pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-350.
UM vs. UIM Status
Select one:
☐ Uninsured Motorist (UM) Claim:
- The Defendant Motorist was uninsured at the time of the accident within the meaning of S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-150, in that [☐ the Defendant Motorist had no bodily injury liability insurance in effect / ☐ the Defendant Motorist is unknown (hit-and-run) / ☐ the Defendant Motorist's insurer has denied coverage / ☐ the Defendant Motorist's insurer is insolvent].
16A. [For hit-and-run claims only:] Plaintiff reported the accident to [LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY] within a reasonable time after its occurrence, and [☐ the collision involved physical contact with the unknown vehicle / ☐ the accident was witnessed by [WITNESS NAME], who has signed (or will sign) an affidavit attesting to the facts of the accident as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-170(B) / ☐ Plaintiff possesses a video or electronic recording of the accident showing the unknown vehicle caused the injury or damage]. Plaintiff was not negligent in failing to determine the identity of the unknown owner or operator, as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-170.
☐ Underinsured Motorist (UIM) Claim:
-
The Defendant Motorist maintained bodily injury liability coverage with limits of $[TORTFEASOR POLICY LIMIT], which is insufficient to compensate Plaintiff for damages sustained, thereby qualifying as underinsured under S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-160.
-
Plaintiff has exhausted or is prepared to exhaust the Defendant Motorist's liability policy limits and has obtained [☐ a settlement / ☐ a judgment] in the amount of $[AMOUNT RECOVERED FROM TORTFEASOR].
-
Defendant Insurer was served with copies of the pleadings in the underlying action and given the opportunity to appear and defend as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-160.
First Cause of Action
Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)
-
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
The Policy constitutes a valid and enforceable contract between Plaintiff and Defendant Insurer.
-
Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and obligations required under the Policy, or has been excused from performance.
-
Defendant Insurer has breached the Policy by failing and refusing to pay UM/UIM benefits owed to Plaintiff, despite Plaintiff's timely demand.
-
As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Insurer's breach, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial, but not less than $[ESTIMATED DAMAGES].
Second Cause of Action
Bad Faith Refusal to Pay Insurance Benefits
-
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Under South Carolina law, an insurer has a duty to deal with its insured in good faith and to pay valid claims promptly.
-
Defendant Insurer has acted in bad faith by:
☐ Unreasonably delaying investigation of the claim
☐ Failing to conduct a thorough and fair investigation
☐ Unreasonably denying benefits without factual justification
☐ Failing to attempt in good faith to effectuate a prompt and fair settlement
☐ Compelling Plaintiff to initiate litigation to recover amounts due
☐ Refusing to pay a claim without conducting a reasonable investigation based upon all available information
☐ Other: [________________________________]
- Defendant Insurer's refusal to pay was without reasonable cause and in bad faith, entitling Plaintiff to consequential damages, attorney's fees, and costs.
Damages
- As a result of the accident and Defendant Insurer's breaches, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer the following damages:
☐ Past medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Past lost wages/earnings: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future lost wages/earning capacity: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Pain and suffering (past and future): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Emotional distress: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Punitive damages (against tortfeasor for reckless/willful conduct): According to proof
☐ Bad faith damages (against insurer): According to proof
☐ Attorney's fees and costs
☐ Prejudgment interest
Stacking of Coverage
-
Plaintiff is entitled to UM/UIM coverage under the Policy, including coverage applicable to other vehicles insured by Defendant Insurer to the extent permitted by S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-160.
-
At the time of the accident, the following vehicles were insured under the Policy or other policies issued by Defendant Insurer to Plaintiff:
a. Vehicle 1: [YEAR MAKE MODEL] — UM/UIM limits: $[AMOUNT]
b. Vehicle 2: [YEAR MAKE MODEL] — UM/UIM limits: $[AMOUNT]
c. Vehicle 3: [YEAR MAKE MODEL] — UM/UIM limits: $[AMOUNT]
- Plaintiff is entitled to stack UM/UIM limits up to the coverage applicable to the vehicle involved in the collision.
Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:
- For compensatory damages against Defendant Motorist in an amount according to proof at trial;
- For UM/UIM policy benefits against Defendant Insurer in the full amount owed under the Policy;
- For stacked UM/UIM coverage as permitted by S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-160;
- For punitive damages against Defendant Motorist for reckless/willful conduct;
- For bad faith damages against Defendant Insurer;
- For attorney's fees and costs;
- For prejudgment interest as permitted by law; and
- For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
Verification
I, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], verify under oath that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Dated: [__/__/____]
Signature: [________________________________]
Printed Name: [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME]
Sworn to and subscribed before me this [____] day of [____________], [________].
Notary Public: [________________________________]
My Commission Expires: [__/__/____]
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
[ATTORNEY NAME], SC Bar No. [BAR NUMBER]
[FIRM NAME]
[FIRM ADDRESS]
[CITY], South Carolina [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
State-Specific Notes — South Carolina
| Topic | Detail |
|---|---|
| UM Mandatory? | Yes; every auto liability policy must include UM coverage at least equal to the mandatory liability minimums (§ 38-77-150; baseline limits set by § 38-77-140) |
| UIM Mandatory? | Not mandatory to purchase, but insurer must make a "meaningful offer" of UIM up to the insured's liability limits (§ 38-77-160; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Wannamaker, 291 S.C. 518 (1987)) |
| Minimum UM Limits | $25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident bodily injury, $25,000 property damage (matching minimum liability limits under § 38-77-140); a $200 property-damage deductible is permitted |
| Insurer as Party Defendant | Insurer must be served with pleadings; has 30 days after service to appear and defend (§ 38-77-150(B); § 38-77-160) |
| Stacking | Where excess UM/UIM limits are carried, recovery is limited to the coverage on the vehicle involved in the accident, or if none of the insured's vehicles was involved, to the coverage on any one of the insured's vehicles — this is a limitation on stacking, not an open-ended stacking right (§ 38-77-160) |
| Arbitration | NOT mandatory — S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-200 expressly prohibits an insurer from requiring arbitration of a claim under the UM provision; a UIM carrier's ability to compel arbitration under a policy clause is further limited because it stands in the tortfeasor's (not the insured's) shoes (see Weber v. Lewis, 2018 WL 5885511 (D.S.C. 2018)) |
| Exhaustion (UIM) | Must exhaust or demonstrate exhaustion of tortfeasor's liability limits (settlement/covenant not to execute is sufficient; full judgment not required) |
| Bad Faith | First-party bad faith tort recognized (Nichols v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 279 S.C. 336 (1983); Tadlock Painting Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 322 S.C. 498 (1996)); consequential and punitive damages available; per Hood v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 445 S.C. 1 (2025), the only claims available to a first-party insured are contract and bad faith — not independent negligence |
| Written Rejection/Selection | Insured may select lower UM/UIM limits or reject optional coverage in writing on the form prescribed under S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-350; a properly executed and signed form creates a conclusive presumption of informed selection |
| Hit-and-Run | UM coverage applies; name "John Doe" as defendant motorist (§ 38-77-180). Since 2024 Act No. 180 (eff. May 20, 2024), § 38-77-170 no longer requires physical contact with the unknown vehicle in every case — a signed witness affidavit (or court-ordered presuit deposition) or a video/electronic recording of the accident are now independently sufficient alternatives, provided the accident was timely reported and the insured was not negligent in failing to identify the other driver |
Sources and References
- S.C. Code Title 38, Chapter 77 (full chapter, official) — SC Legislature
- S.C. Code § 38-77-140 — SC Legislature
- S.C. Code § 38-77-150 — SC Legislature
- S.C. Code § 38-77-160 — SC Legislature
- S.C. Code § 38-77-170 (amended 2024 Act No. 180) — SC Legislature
- S.C. Code § 38-77-180 (John Doe actions) — SC Legislature
- S.C. Code § 38-77-200 (arbitration clause prohibited) — SC Legislature
- S.C. Code § 38-77-350 (form for written rejection/selection of optional coverage) — SC Legislature
- Nichols v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 279 S.C. 336 (1983) — Justia
- Hood v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, Op. No. 28249 (S.C. Jan. 8, 2025) — SC Courts
- South Carolina UIM FAQ — Goings Law Firm
About this template
- Last updated
- August 24, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- South Carolina
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- S.C. Const. art. V, § 11 (Circuit Court jurisdiction)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-7-30 (venue by defendant type)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 22-3-10(2) (concurrent magistrates-court jurisdiction for specified damages claims)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-140 (mandatory bodily injury/property damage liability limits — $25,000/$50,000/$25,000 baseline)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-150 (mandatory uninsured motorist (UM) provision; insurer's right to appear/defend; subrogation)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-160 (additional UM coverage and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage must be offered; insurer defense; anti-stacking-across-vehicles limitation)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-170 (conditions to sue under UM provision when tortfeasor is unknown — hit-and-run; amended by 2024 Act No. 180 to add witness-affidavit and video-recording alternatives to physical contact)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-350 (form and procedure for written rejection/selection of optional UM/UIM coverage limits)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-200 (arbitration of UM claims may not be required by policy)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
S.C. Const. art. V, § 11 (checked August 24, 2026): "The Circuit Court shall be a general trial court with original jurisdiction in civil and criminal cases, except those cases in which exclusive jurisdiction shall be given to inferior courts, and shall have such appellate jurisdiction as provided by law."
S.C. Code Ann. § 15-7-30(C), (H) (checked August 24, 2026): "A civil action tried pursuant to this section against a resident individual defendant must be brought and tried in the county in which the: (1) defendant resides at the time the cause of action arose; or (2) most substantial part of the alleged act or omission giving rise to the cause of action occurred. Owning property and transacting business in a county is insufficient in and of itself to establish the principal place of business for a corporation for purposes of this section."
S.C. Code Ann. § 22-3-10(2) (checked August 24, 2026): "Magistrates have concurrent civil jurisdiction in actions for damages for injury to rights pertaining to the person or personal or real property, if the damages claimed do not exceed seven thousand five hundred dollars."
Draft your Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.