PROFESSIONAL BOARD SUBPOENA RESPONSE
COVER LETTER - RESPONSE TO INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA
Date: [__/__/____]
VIA: ☐ Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested ☐ Hand Delivery ☐ Email ☐ FedEx/UPS
TO:
[________________________________]
State Board of [________________________________]
Enforcement Division / Office of Investigations
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
FROM:
Respondent/Licensee Name: [________________________________]
License Number: [________________________________]
License Type: [________________________________]
Address: [________________________________]
City, State, ZIP: [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
RE: Response to Subpoena Duces Tecum / Subpoena for Documents
Case/Investigation Number: [________________________________]
Subpoena Date: [__/__/____]
Response Deadline: [__/__/____]
Dear Investigator/Enforcement Officer:
This letter and accompanying documents constitute the response of [________________________________] ("Respondent") to the Subpoena Duces Tecum issued on [__/__/____] in the above-referenced investigation.
☐ Respondent produces all documents responsive to the subpoena as detailed below.
☐ Respondent produces documents responsive to the subpoena, subject to the objections stated herein.
☐ Respondent objects to the subpoena in whole or in part for the reasons stated herein.
☐ Respondent requests a conference to discuss the scope of the subpoena before production.
SECTION 1: SUBPOENA ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Date Subpoena Received: [__/__/____]
Method of Service: ☐ Personal Service ☐ Certified Mail ☐ Regular Mail ☐ Other: [________________________________]
Response Deadline Per Subpoena: [__/__/____]
Response Deadline with Extension (if granted): [__/__/____]
Documents/Testimony Demanded
(List each category of documents or testimony demanded in the subpoena)
| Item No. | Description of Demand | Response |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
| 2 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
| 3 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
| 4 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
| 5 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
| 6 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
| 7 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
| 8 | [________________________________] | ☐ Produced ☐ Objection ☐ Partial |
SECTION 2: OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENA
General Objections
Respondent objects to the subpoena to the extent that it:
☐ Exceeds Statutory Authority
The Board lacks authority to demand: [________________________________]
Cite: [________________________________]
☐ Overbreadth
The request is overbroad and seeks documents beyond the scope of the investigation:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
☐ Undue Burden
Compliance would impose an undue burden because:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Estimated hours to compile: [____]
Estimated cost: $[________________________________]
☐ Irrelevance
The requested documents are not relevant to the investigation:
[________________________________]
☐ Vagueness/Ambiguity
The following requests are too vague to permit meaningful response:
[________________________________]
☐ Time Period Excessive
The time period requested ([________________________________]) exceeds the statute of limitations or is otherwise unreasonable.
☐ Privilege (See Specific Privilege Assertions Below)
☐ Confidentiality Protections (See Section 3)
☐ Other: [________________________________]
Specific Objections by Request Number
Request No. [____]:
Request Text: [________________________________]
Objection(s):
☐ Overbroad
☐ Unduly burdensome
☐ Seeks privileged information
☐ Not relevant
☐ Vague/ambiguous
☐ Other: [________________________________]
Specific Grounds:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Response Subject to Objection:
☐ Documents withheld entirely
☐ Documents produced in part
☐ Documents produced with redactions
Request No. [____]:
Request Text: [________________________________]
Objection(s):
☐ Overbroad
☐ Unduly burdensome
☐ Seeks privileged information
☐ Not relevant
☐ Vague/ambiguous
☐ Other: [________________________________]
Specific Grounds:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Response Subject to Objection:
☐ Documents withheld entirely
☐ Documents produced in part
☐ Documents produced with redactions
SECTION 3: PRIVILEGE ASSERTIONS
Attorney-Client Privilege
☐ Documents are being withheld based on attorney-client privilege.
Privilege Log:
| Doc No. | Date | Author | Recipient | Description | Privilege |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [____] | [__/__/____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | Attorney-Client |
| [____] | [__/__/____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | Attorney-Client |
| [____] | [__/__/____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | Attorney-Client |
Work Product Doctrine
☐ Documents are being withheld based on work product doctrine.
| Doc No. | Date | Author | Description | Privilege |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [____] | [__/__/____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | Work Product |
Fifth Amendment (Self-Incrimination)
☐ Respondent asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination as to:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Note: This assertion is made without any admission of wrongdoing.
Other Privileges
☐ Peer Review/Quality Assurance Privilege
State Statute: [________________________________]
Documents Withheld: [________________________________]
☐ Physician-Patient Privilege / Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege
Respondent objects to production of patient records without proper authorization or court order.
☐ HIPAA Protected Information (See Section 4)
☐ Trade Secret / Proprietary Information
The following documents contain trade secrets: [________________________________]
☐ Other Privilege: [________________________________]
Basis: [________________________________]
SECTION 4: HIPAA AND PATIENT PRIVACY CONSIDERATIONS
For Healthcare Licensees
☐ The subpoena demands Protected Health Information (PHI) as defined by HIPAA.
Respondent's Position:
☐ PHI is produced pursuant to Board's investigative authority and HIPAA regulatory exception (45 C.F.R. § 164.512)
☐ PHI is withheld pending patient authorization or court order
☐ PHI is produced in de-identified form
☐ PHI is produced with patient identifiers redacted
Patients Whose Records Are Requested:
| Patient Initials | Record Dates | Authorization Obtained | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| [____] | [________________________________] | ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A | ☐ Produced ☐ Withheld |
| [____] | [________________________________] | ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A | ☐ Produced ☐ Withheld |
| [____] | [________________________________] | ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A | ☐ Produced ☐ Withheld |
Request for Protective Order
☐ Respondent requests that the Board enter a protective order limiting use and disclosure of patient information produced in response to this subpoena.
SECTION 5: DOCUMENTS PRODUCED
Index of Documents Produced
| Bates No. Range | Description | Request No. | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [____] | [____] |
Total Pages Produced: [________________________________]
Format: ☐ Paper ☐ PDF ☐ Native Electronic ☐ Other: [________________________________]
Documents Produced with Redactions
| Bates No. | Description | Reason for Redaction |
|---|---|---|
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
Documents Withheld Entirely
| Description | Request No. | Reason Withheld |
|---|---|---|
| [________________________________] | [____] | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | [____] | [________________________________] |
SECTION 6: STATEMENT OF SEARCH
Respondent has conducted a reasonable search for documents responsive to the subpoena.
Locations Searched:
☐ Office files at: [________________________________]
☐ Electronic files/email
☐ Home office
☐ Off-site storage at: [________________________________]
☐ Cloud storage: [________________________________]
☐ Former employee files
☐ Other: [________________________________]
Custodians Searched:
1. [________________________________]
2. [________________________________]
3. [________________________________]
Search Terms Used (for electronic documents):
[________________________________]
Date Range Searched: [__/__/____] to [__/__/____]
Statement:
I have made a diligent search for all documents responsive to the subpoena and have produced all non-privileged, non-objectionable documents located through that search.
SECTION 7: NON-EXISTENCE OF DOCUMENTS
The following requested documents do not exist or are not in Respondent's possession, custody, or control:
| Request No. | Documents Requested | Reason Not Produced |
|---|---|---|
| [____] | [________________________________] | ☐ Never existed ☐ Previously destroyed in ordinary course ☐ Not in possession |
| [____] | [________________________________] | ☐ Never existed ☐ Previously destroyed in ordinary course ☐ Not in possession |
| [____] | [________________________________] | ☐ Never existed ☐ Previously destroyed in ordinary course ☐ Not in possession |
Explanation: [________________________________]
[________________________________]
SECTION 8: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OR CONFERENCE
☐ Request for Extension of Time
Respondent requests an extension of [____] days to fully respond because:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
☐ Request for Meet and Confer
Respondent requests a conference with the investigator/enforcement counsel to:
☐ Clarify scope of requests
☐ Negotiate reduction in scope
☐ Discuss privilege issues
☐ Other: [________________________________]
Proposed Conference Date(s): [________________________________]
Contact Information: [________________________________]
SECTION 9: MOTION TO QUASH (if applicable)
☐ Respondent intends to file a Motion to Quash this subpoena.
Grounds:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Pending Deadline for Motion: [__/__/____]
☐ Respondent requests that production be stayed pending resolution of the Motion to Quash.
SECTION 10: STATE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION
California
Statutory Authority for Subpoena:
- Business and Professions Code § 11181 (investigation powers)
- Government Code § 11180-11191 (administrative subpoenas)
Objection Procedure:
- File objections with issuing agency
- Motion to quash in Superior Court
Failure to Comply:
- Contempt proceedings
- Independent ground for discipline
Texas
Statutory Authority:
- Texas Government Code § 2001.089
- Individual licensing act provisions
Objection Procedure:
- Negotiate with agency
- Seek protective order from SOAH
Florida
Statutory Authority:
- Florida Statutes § 456.073 (health professions)
- Agency enabling statutes
Objection Procedure:
- Raise objections with agency
- Challenge in DOAH if disputed
New York
Statutory Authority:
- Education Law (regulated professions)
- State Administrative Procedure Act
Objection Procedure:
- Negotiate with agency
- Motion to quash in Supreme Court
SECTION 11: RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
Respondent reserves the right to:
-
Supplement this response if additional responsive documents are located.
-
Assert additional objections or privileges as appropriate.
-
File a Motion to Quash or for Protective Order.
-
Seek judicial review of any adverse ruling on objections.
-
Object to any use of produced documents beyond the scope of this investigation.
-
All other rights and defenses available under law.
This response is made without waiver of any rights or defenses and shall not be construed as an admission of any violation or wrongdoing.
SECTION 12: CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, certify under penalty of perjury that:
-
I am the Respondent or authorized representative of the Respondent.
-
I have conducted a diligent search for documents responsive to the subpoena.
-
All documents produced are true and accurate copies of the originals.
-
All statements made in this response are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
-
No documents have been destroyed, altered, or concealed for the purpose of evading this subpoena.
Respondent Signature: [________________________________]
Printed Name: [________________________________]
Title (if applicable): [________________________________]
Date: [__/__/____]
SECTION 13: ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION (if applicable)
I am counsel for the Respondent. I have reviewed this response and the objections stated herein are made in good faith and are supported by law and fact.
Attorney Signature: [________________________________]
Printed Name: [________________________________]
Bar Number: [________________________________]
Firm: [________________________________]
Address: [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Date: [__/__/____]
Please direct all future communications regarding this matter to counsel.
RESPONSE CHECKLIST
☐ Response filed within deadline
☐ All requests addressed (production, objection, or statement of non-existence)
☐ Privilege log prepared for withheld documents
☐ Bates numbering applied to produced documents
☐ Redactions clearly marked with reason
☐ Search methodology documented
☐ Response signed and dated
☐ Copy retained for records
☐ Sent via verifiable delivery method
☐ Attorney consulted (strongly recommended)
SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
Send Response To:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Reference: Case/Investigation No. [________________________________]
Proof of Delivery: Retain tracking information and delivery confirmation.
CRITICAL WARNING: Failure to respond to a licensing board subpoena can itself be grounds for disciplinary action, including license suspension or revocation. Before responding, objecting, or moving to quash a subpoena, consult immediately with an attorney experienced in professional license defense. Anything you produce may be used in disciplinary proceedings against you. This template provides general guidance only and does not constitute legal advice. Response deadlines are typically short - often 10-30 days.
Do more with Ezel
This free template is just the beginning. See how Ezel helps legal teams draft, research, and collaborate faster.
AI that drafts while you watch
Tell the AI what you need and watch your document transform in real-time. No more copy-pasting between tools or manually formatting changes.
- Natural language commands: "Add a force majeure clause"
- Context-aware suggestions based on document type
- Real-time streaming shows edits as they happen
- Milestone tracking and version comparison
Research and draft in one conversation
Ask questions, attach documents, and get answers grounded in case law. Link chats to matters so the AI remembers your context.
- Pull statutes, case law, and secondary sources
- Attach and analyze contracts mid-conversation
- Link chats to matters for automatic context
- Your data never trains AI models
Search like you think
Describe your legal question in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, date, and court level. Read full opinions without leaving Ezel.
- All 50 states plus federal courts
- Natural language queries - no boolean syntax
- Citation analysis and network exploration
- Copy quotes with automatic citation generation
Ready to transform your legal workflow?
Join legal teams using Ezel to draft documents, research case law, and organize matters — all in one workspace.