Premises Liability Complaint - Vermont

Vermont Personal Injury Updated April 2, 2026 Free Word and PDF

PREMISES LIABILITY COMPLAINT — VERMONT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Caption
  2. Parties
  3. Jurisdiction and Venue
  4. Factual Allegations
  5. Dangerous Condition and Notice
  6. Duty of Care
  7. Count I — Negligence / Premises Liability
  8. Count II — Negligent Maintenance
  9. Comparative Fault
  10. Damages
  11. Jury Demand
  12. Prayer for Relief

CAPTION

STATE OF VERMONT
SUPERIOR COURT — CIVIL DIVISION
[COUNTY] UNIT

[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], Docket No. [____________]
Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT FULL NAME], COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
Defendant. (Premises Liability)

PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Vermont [ZIP CODE].

  2. Defendant [DEFENDANT FULL NAME] is [an individual residing at / a corporation organized under the laws of [STATE], with its principal place of business at] [DEFENDANT ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Vermont [ZIP CODE].

  3. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant owned, operated, managed, maintained, and/or controlled the real property located at [PROPERTY ADDRESS] ("the Premises").


JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 4 V.S.A. § 31, as this is a civil action within the original jurisdiction of the Superior Court.

  2. Venue is proper in [COUNTY] County pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 402, as the cause of action arose in this county.


FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. On or about [DATE OF INCIDENT], Plaintiff was lawfully present on the Premises located at [PROPERTY ADDRESS], [CITY], Vermont, for the purpose of [PURPOSE OF VISIT, e.g., shopping, conducting business, visiting as a guest].

  2. At the time of the incident, Plaintiff was a lawful entrant on the Premises.

  3. While on the Premises, Plaintiff [DESCRIBE THE INCIDENT, e.g., slipped and fell on an icy walkway, tripped over a raised threshold, was injured by a falling object].

  4. As a direct and proximate result of the incident, Plaintiff suffered serious bodily injuries, including but not limited to [DESCRIBE INJURIES].


DANGEROUS CONDITION AND NOTICE

  1. At the time of Plaintiff's injury, there existed a dangerous condition on the Premises, specifically [DESCRIBE DANGEROUS CONDITION IN DETAIL].

  2. The dangerous condition had existed for [DURATION OR DESCRIPTION OF TIME PERIOD], which was sufficient time for Defendant, in the exercise of reasonable care, to discover and remedy the condition.

  3. Defendant had actual notice of the dangerous condition because [DESCRIBE BASIS FOR ACTUAL NOTICE].

  4. Alternatively, Defendant had constructive notice of the dangerous condition because the condition existed for a sufficient length of time that Defendant, in the exercise of reasonable care and diligence, should have discovered and corrected it. Courts consider the duration the hazard existed, foreseeability, and the owner's inspection routines.

  5. Despite having actual and/or constructive notice of the dangerous condition, Defendant failed to repair, remedy, guard, barricade, or warn of the dangerous condition.


DUTY OF CARE

  1. As the owner, operator, and/or controller of the Premises, Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty of reasonable care in all the circumstances to maintain the Premises in a reasonably safe condition and to protect lawful entrants from foreseeable harm.

  2. Defendant's duty included, but was not limited to:
    - ☐ Regularly inspecting the Premises to discover dangerous conditions;
    - ☐ Repairing known hazards in a timely manner;
    - ☐ Warning of dangerous conditions that could not be immediately remedied;
    - ☐ Maintaining the Premises in a reasonably safe condition for all lawful entrants;
    - ☐ Removing snow and ice within a reasonable time after a storm ceases.


COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE / PREMISES LIABILITY

  1. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.

  2. Defendant breached the duty of care owed to Plaintiff by one or more of the following acts or omissions:
    - ☐ Failing to maintain the Premises in a reasonably safe condition;
    - ☐ Failing to inspect the Premises to discover the dangerous condition;
    - ☐ Failing to repair or remedy the dangerous condition within a reasonable time;
    - ☐ Failing to warn Plaintiff of the dangerous condition;
    - ☐ Failing to barricade or guard the dangerous condition;
    - ☐ [OTHER SPECIFIC ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE].

  3. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff suffered the injuries and damages described herein.


COUNT II — NEGLIGENT MAINTENANCE

  1. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.

  2. Defendant negligently maintained the Premises by [DESCRIBE SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE FAILURES].

  3. Defendant's negligent maintenance of the Premises was a direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.


COMPARATIVE FAULT

  1. Plaintiff was not at fault for the incident described herein, or alternatively, any negligence attributable to Plaintiff was not greater than the combined causal negligence of the Defendant or Defendants.

DAMAGES

  1. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer the following damages:

Economic Damages:

  • ☐ Past medical expenses in the amount of $[AMOUNT];
  • ☐ Future medical expenses estimated at $[AMOUNT];
  • ☐ Lost wages and earning capacity in the amount of $[AMOUNT];
  • ☐ Future lost wages and diminished earning capacity estimated at $[AMOUNT];
  • ☐ Property damage in the amount of $[AMOUNT];
  • ☐ Other economic losses: [DESCRIBE].

Non-Economic Damages:

  • ☐ Physical pain and suffering, past and future;
  • ☐ Mental anguish and emotional distress;
  • ☐ Loss of enjoyment of life;
  • ☐ Permanent impairment and/or disfigurement;
  • ☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable).

JURY DEMAND

  1. Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable as a matter of right.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as follows:

  1. Compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
  2. Economic damages including medical expenses, lost wages, and future care costs;
  3. Non-economic damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life;
  4. Punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and deter Defendant's conduct;
  5. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law;
  6. Costs of suit, including filing fees and service costs;
  7. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

[LAW FIRM NAME]

By: [________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME], Esq.
[BAR NUMBER]
[FIRM ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE]
[TELEPHONE]
[EMAIL]

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: [__/__/____]


VERIFICATION

STATE OF VERMONT
COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

I, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], being duly sworn, state that I have read the foregoing Complaint, and the facts stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

[________________________________]
[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME]

Subscribed and sworn to before me this [____] day of [________], [____].

[________________________________]
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: [__/__/____]


STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES — VERMONT

Topic Detail
Statute of Limitations 3 years (12 V.S.A. § 512); 1 year for skiing injuries (12 V.S.A. § 513)
Comparative Fault Modified — 51% bar; plaintiff barred only if negligence is greater than defendants' combined causal negligence (12 V.S.A. § 1036(a))
Duty Standard Unified reasonable care for all lawful entrants; invitee/licensee distinction abolished (Demag v. Better Power Equipment, 2014 VT 78)
Notice Requirement Actual or constructive notice required; courts evaluate duration of hazard, foreseeability, and inspection routines
Open & Obvious Factor in reasonableness analysis, not an absolute bar; may reduce duty to warn
Snow/Ice Rule Storm in Progress Rule — no duty to remove during storm; reasonable time after storm ceases; general reasonable care standard applies
Damages Caps No statutory caps on non-economic or punitive damages in premises liability
Filing Court Superior Court, Civil Division

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)Choose a plan

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
premises_liability_complaint_vt.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Draft it in the editor

The AI drafts each section from your answers and you review every word. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours for $99 one time.

  • Built on this template
    Uses the Vermont version and the statutes it cites.
  • Formatted like the template
    Captions, numbering and layout stay intact.
  • AI editing
    Rewrite any section from your own notes.
  • Export as PDF and Word
    Yours to review, sign, or file.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About this template

Last updated
April 2, 2026
Jurisdiction
Vermont
Category
Personal Injury

Legal authority

  • 12 V.S.A. § 512 (Statute of limitations — three years)
  • 12 V.S.A. § 1036 (Modified comparative negligence — 51% bar)
  • 12 V.S.A. § 513 (Skiing injury limitation — one year)

Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Checked against the law it cites

The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.

Draft your Premises Liability Complaint in the editor

Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.