Premises Liability Complaint - South Dakota
PREMISES LIABILITY COMPLAINT — SOUTH DAKOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Dangerous Condition and Notice
- Duty of Care
- Count I — Negligence / Premises Liability
- Count II — Negligent Maintenance
- Comparative Fault
- Damages
- Jury Demand
- Prayer for Relief
CAPTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
[JUDICIAL CIRCUIT]
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]
| [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], | Civ. No. [____________] |
| Plaintiff, | |
| v. | |
| [DEFENDANT FULL NAME], | COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES |
| Defendant. | (Premises Liability) |
PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, South Dakota [ZIP CODE].
-
Defendant [DEFENDANT FULL NAME] is [an individual residing at / a corporation organized under the laws of [STATE], with its principal place of business at] [DEFENDANT ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, South Dakota [ZIP CODE].
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant owned, operated, managed, maintained, and/or controlled the real property located at [PROPERTY ADDRESS] ("the Premises").
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to SDCL 16-6-9, as this is a civil action within the original jurisdiction of the Circuit Court.
-
Venue is proper in [COUNTY] County pursuant to SDCL § 15-5-8, as the damages were inflicted and the cause of action arose in this county (and/or SDCL § 15-5-6, as a Defendant resides in this county).
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
On or about [DATE OF INCIDENT], Plaintiff was lawfully present on the Premises located at [PROPERTY ADDRESS], [CITY], South Dakota, for the purpose of [PURPOSE OF VISIT, e.g., shopping, conducting business, visiting as a guest].
-
At the time of the incident, Plaintiff was a [business invitee / licensee / social guest] on the Premises.
-
While on the Premises, Plaintiff [DESCRIBE THE INCIDENT, e.g., slipped and fell on an icy parking lot, tripped over a broken threshold, was injured by a collapsing structure].
-
As a direct and proximate result of the incident, Plaintiff suffered serious bodily injuries, including but not limited to [DESCRIBE INJURIES].
DANGEROUS CONDITION AND NOTICE
-
At the time of Plaintiff's injury, there existed a dangerous condition on the Premises, specifically [DESCRIBE DANGEROUS CONDITION IN DETAIL].
-
The dangerous condition had existed for [DURATION OR DESCRIPTION OF TIME PERIOD], which was sufficient time for Defendant, in the exercise of reasonable care, to discover and remedy the condition.
-
Defendant had actual notice of the dangerous condition because [DESCRIBE BASIS FOR ACTUAL NOTICE].
-
Alternatively, Defendant had constructive notice of the dangerous condition because the condition existed for a sufficient length of time that Defendant, in the exercise of reasonable care and diligence, should have discovered and corrected it.
-
Despite having actual and/or constructive notice of the dangerous condition, Defendant failed to repair, remedy, guard, barricade, or warn of the dangerous condition.
DUTY OF CARE
-
As the owner, operator, and/or controller of the Premises, Defendant owed Plaintiff, as a business invitee, the duty to exercise reasonable or ordinary care for Plaintiff's safety, including the duty to keep the Premises in a reasonably safe condition and to warn of known hazards.
-
Defendant's duty included, but was not limited to:
- ☐ Regularly inspecting the Premises to discover dangerous conditions;
- ☐ Repairing known hazards in a timely manner;
- ☐ Warning of dangerous conditions that could not be immediately remedied;
- ☐ Maintaining the Premises in a reasonably safe condition for invitees;
- ☐ Removing unnatural accumulations of snow and ice from walkways and parking areas.
COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE / PREMISES LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
Defendant breached the duty of care owed to Plaintiff by one or more of the following acts or omissions:
- ☐ Failing to maintain the Premises in a reasonably safe condition;
- ☐ Failing to inspect the Premises to discover the dangerous condition;
- ☐ Failing to repair or remedy the dangerous condition within a reasonable time;
- ☐ Failing to warn Plaintiff of the dangerous condition;
- ☐ Failing to barricade or guard the dangerous condition;
- ☐ Creating an unnatural or artificial accumulation of snow, ice, or other hazardous substance;
- ☐ [OTHER SPECIFIC ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE]. -
As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff suffered the injuries and damages described herein.
COUNT II — NEGLIGENT MAINTENANCE
-
Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
Defendant negligently maintained the Premises by [DESCRIBE SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE FAILURES].
-
Defendant's negligent maintenance of the Premises was a direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
COMPARATIVE FAULT
- Plaintiff was not at fault for the incident described herein, or alternatively, any fault attributable to Plaintiff was "slight" in comparison to the negligence of Defendant, which was "gross."
DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer the following damages:
Economic Damages:
- ☐ Past medical expenses in the amount of $[AMOUNT];
- ☐ Future medical expenses estimated at $[AMOUNT];
- ☐ Lost wages and earning capacity in the amount of $[AMOUNT];
- ☐ Future lost wages and diminished earning capacity estimated at $[AMOUNT];
- ☐ Property damage in the amount of $[AMOUNT];
- ☐ Other economic losses: [DESCRIBE].
Non-Economic Damages:
- ☐ Physical pain and suffering, past and future;
- ☐ Mental anguish and emotional distress;
- ☐ Loss of enjoyment of life;
- ☐ Permanent impairment and/or disfigurement;
- ☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable).
JURY DEMAND
- Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable as a matter of right.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as follows:
- Compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
- Economic damages including medical expenses, lost wages, and future care costs;
- Non-economic damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life;
- Punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and deter Defendant's conduct;
- Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law;
- Costs of suit, including filing fees and service costs;
- Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
[LAW FIRM NAME]
By: [________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME], Esq.
[BAR NUMBER]
[FIRM ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE]
[TELEPHONE]
[EMAIL]
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: [__/__/____]
VERIFICATION
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]
I, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], being duly sworn, state that I have read the foregoing Complaint, and the facts stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
[________________________________]
[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME]
Subscribed and sworn to before me this [____] day of [________], [____].
[________________________________]
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: [__/__/____]
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES — SOUTH DAKOTA
| Topic | Detail |
|---|---|
| Statute of Limitations | 3 years (SDCL 15-2-14) |
| Comparative Fault | Unique "slight vs. gross" system; plaintiff's contributory negligence must be "slight" compared to defendant's negligence (SDCL 20-9-2) |
| Duty Standard | Traditional invitee/licensee/trespasser; invitees owed reasonable care (Musch v. H-D Electric Co-Op; Underberg v. Cain) |
| Notice Requirement | Actual or constructive notice required |
| Open & Obvious | Recognized as a factor in the liability analysis |
| Snow/Ice Rule | Natural accumulation rule — no liability for natural snow/ice; liability only for unnatural/artificial accumulations (Budahl v. Gordon and David Associates) |
| Damages Caps | No general cap on noneconomic damages in premises liability; punitive damages allowed for oppression, fraud, or malice (SDCL 21-3-2) |
| Filing Court | Circuit Court |
About this template
- Last updated
- April 2, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- South Dakota
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- SDCL 15-2-14 (Statute of limitations — three years)
- SDCL 20-9-2 (Comparative negligence — slight vs. gross)
- SDCL 21-3-2 (Punitive damages)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
Draft your Premises Liability Complaint in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.