Motion to Reconsider Sentence
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Motion Header
- Original Sentence Summary
- Grounds for Relief
- Mitigating Factors
- Rehabilitation Evidence
- Proposed Modified Sentence
- Legal Authority
- Proposed Order
- Certificate of Service
- State-Specific Notes
Caption
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF [________________________________]
| STATE OF WASHINGTON, | Case No.: [________________________________] |
| Plaintiff, | |
| v. | MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM |
| JUDGMENT (CrR 7.8) | |
| [________________________________], | |
| Defendant. |
Motion Header
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CrR 7.8
COMES NOW the Defendant, [________________________________], by and through [his/her/their] attorney, [________________________________], and pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 7.8, respectfully moves this Court for relief from the judgment and sentence entered on [__/__/____], and in support thereof states as follows:
Original Sentence Summary
-
Defendant's Name: [________________________________]
-
DOC Number (if applicable): [________________________________]
-
Date of Sentencing: [__/__/____]
-
Sentencing Judge: Hon. [________________________________]
-
Offense(s) of Conviction:
| Count | Offense | RCW Section | Seriousness Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| [____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| [____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
-
Offender Score: [____]
-
Standard Sentencing Range: [________________________________]
-
Plea or Verdict: ☐ Guilty Plea ☐ Jury Verdict ☐ Bench Trial
-
Sentence Imposed: [________________________________]
-
Sentence Relative to Standard Range: ☐ Within standard range ☐ Exceptional sentence above ☐ Exceptional sentence below
-
Date Judgment Became Final: [__/__/____]
-
One-Year Filing Deadline (RCW 10.73.090): [__/__/____]
Grounds for Relief
Defendant seeks relief from the judgment on the following grounds (CrR 7.8(b)):
☐ A. Mistake, Inadvertence, Surprise, or Excusable Neglect (CrR 7.8(b)(1)). [________________________________]
☐ B. Newly Discovered Evidence (CrR 7.8(b)(2)). Evidence has been discovered that by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial: [________________________________]
☐ C. Fraud, Misrepresentation, or Misconduct (CrR 7.8(b)(3)). The judgment was obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party: [________________________________]
☐ D. Void Judgment (CrR 7.8(b)(4)). The judgment is void because: [________________________________]
☐ E. Any Other Reason Justifying Relief (CrR 7.8(b)(5)). Relief is warranted because: [________________________________]
☐ F. Sentence Based on Void Statute (CrR 7.8(c)(2)(i)). Defendant is serving a sentence under a statute that a higher court has determined to be void, invalid, or unconstitutional: [________________________________]
☐ G. Sentencing Error. The sentence was imposed in error: [________________________________]
☐ H. Disproportionate Sentence. The sentence is clearly excessive: [________________________________]
☐ I. Cooperation with Authorities. Defendant has provided substantial cooperation with law enforcement: [________________________________]
Mitigating Factors
The following mitigating factors support relief:
☐ Defendant's age at the time of the offense: [________________________________]
☐ Defendant's current age: [________________________________]
☐ Prior criminal history (or lack thereof): [________________________________]
☐ Role in the offense: [________________________________]
☐ Mental health conditions: [________________________________]
☐ Substance abuse history and recovery: [________________________________]
☐ Impact on Defendant's dependents: [________________________________]
☐ Employment and work history: [________________________________]
☐ Military service: [________________________________]
☐ Community ties: [________________________________]
☐ Other mitigating factors: [________________________________]
Rehabilitation Evidence
Defendant has achieved the following:
A. Programs Completed:
| Program | Date Completed | Documentation Attached |
|---|---|---|
| [________________________________] | [__/__/____] | ☐ Yes ☐ No |
| [________________________________] | [__/__/____] | ☐ Yes ☐ No |
B. Employment and Vocational Training:
[________________________________]
C. Educational Achievements:
[________________________________]
D. Community Ties and Reentry Plan:
[________________________________]
E. Support Letters:
☐ Letters from family members (number attached: [____])
☐ Letters from community members (number attached: [____])
☐ Letters from institutional staff (number attached: [____])
☐ Letters from prospective employers (number attached: [____])
F. Disciplinary Record:
[________________________________]
Proposed Modified Sentence
Defendant respectfully requests the Court grant the following relief:
[________________________________]
Legal Authority
A. CrR 7.8 — Provides grounds for relief from judgment, including mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud, void judgment, and any other reason justifying relief.
B. RCW 10.73.090 — Imposes a one-year time limit on collateral attacks after the judgment becomes final. Exceptions are enumerated in RCW 10.73.100.
C. RCW 10.73.100 — Exceptions to the one-year time limit include: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) statute held unconstitutional; (3) sentence not authorized by law; (4) insufficient evidence; (5) new rule of constitutional law; (6) certificate of innocence or restoration.
D. CrR 7.8(c) — Requires the superior court to transfer defendant-filed motions to the Court of Appeals as personal restraint petitions unless the motion is not time-barred and the defendant makes a substantial showing of entitlement or a factual hearing is required.
E. Additional Authority:
[________________________________]
Proposed Order
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF [________________________________]
Case No.: [________________________________]
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to CrR 7.8. The Court having reviewed the motion, the State's response, and the record:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
☐ The motion is GRANTED. The judgment and sentence entered on [__/__/____] is vacated and Defendant is resentenced as follows: [________________________________]
☐ The motion is DENIED.
☐ The motion is TRANSFERRED to the Court of Appeals, Division [____], for consideration as a personal restraint petition pursuant to CrR 7.8(c)(2).
Dated: [__/__/____]
_________________________________________
Hon. [________________________________]
Judge, Superior Court
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on [__/__/____], I served a copy of the foregoing Motion for Relief from Judgment on:
☐ Hand delivery
☐ United States Mail, first class, postage prepaid
☐ Electronic filing via [________________________________]
[________________________________] County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Dated: [__/__/____]
_________________________________________
[________________________________]
Attorney for Defendant
WSBA No.: [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
State-Specific Notes
Filing Deadline: CrR 7.8 motions must be brought within a "reasonable time." Grounds under subsections (b)(1)-(3) (mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud) are limited to one year after the judgment becomes final. RCW 10.73.090 independently imposes a one-year time limit on all collateral attacks, with specific exceptions listed in RCW 10.73.100.
Transfer to Court of Appeals: Under CrR 7.8(c), the superior court must transfer defendant-filed motions to the Court of Appeals for disposition as a personal restraint petition unless the court finds: (1) the motion is not time-barred, and (2) the defendant makes a substantial showing of entitlement to relief or a factual hearing is required. This transfer rule significantly affects the procedural posture of most CrR 7.8 motions.
Distinction from Appeal: A CrR 7.8 motion is a collateral attack — it does not affect the finality of the judgment or suspend its operation. It is separate from a direct appeal.
CR 59 Reconsideration: For immediate post-sentencing reconsideration, CR 59 provides a 10-day window from the order entry. This is a narrower vehicle limited to errors of law or fact apparent in the record.
Retroactive Sentencing Changes: CrR 7.8(c)(2)(i) specifically provides relief for defendants serving sentences under a statute that a higher court has determined to be void, invalid, or unconstitutional. General retroactivity of sentencing changes depends on the specific legislation or appellate decision.
Pending Legislation: HB2595 (2025-2026 session) proposes extending the one-year collateral attack limit under RCW 10.73.090 to three years. Practitioners should monitor this bill for developments.
Sentencing Alternatives: Washington offers several sentencing alternatives that may be relevant to modification requests, including Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA), Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative (SSOSA), First-Time Offender Waiver, and Parenting Sentencing Alternative.
About This Template
Criminal law paperwork covers every stage of a criminal case, from the first appearance and bail motion through pretrial motions, plea agreements, sentencing, and appeals. Deadlines in criminal cases are short and often unforgiving, and constitutional rights can be waived just by missing a filing. Using the right motion at the right time can mean the difference between evidence getting suppressed, charges getting reduced, or a case getting dismissed entirely.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: May 2026